دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Anatomic donor surgeries increase self-efficacy in physical therapy education: Use of live versus recorded viewing.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Anatomic donor surgeries increase self-efficacy in physical therapy education: Use of live versus recorded viewing.
المؤلفون: Friel KJ; Department of Physical Therapy, Wingate University, Wingate, North Carolina, USA., Shultz ST; Department of Physical Therapy, Wingate University, Wingate, North Carolina, USA.
المصدر: Anatomical sciences education [Anat Sci Educ] 2023 Nov-Dec; Vol. 16 (6), pp. 1058-1072. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 18.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101392205 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1935-9780 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19359772 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Anat Sci Educ Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Hoboken, N.J. : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Anatomy*/education , Physical Therapy Specialty*/education , Students, Medical* , Education, Medical, Undergraduate*/methods, Humans ; Self Efficacy ; Dissection/education ; Curriculum ; Cadaver
مستخلص: Anatomy serves as a foundational course in physical therapy education, but, due to its early placement in the curriculum, may have limited clinical application at that point of a student's education. Thus, augmenting a standard dissection course with surgical procedures can enhance the clinical relevance and knowledge of the anatomical structures involved in those surgeries. Doctor of Physical Therapy students viewed a variety of cadaveric orthopedic and cardiothoracic surgeries performed by a surgeon. Students unable to participate live viewed the recorded surgeries. Participants completed a 10-point Likert scale survey, developed by the researchers, pre- and post-viewing, on self-efficacy of knowledge, patient intervention and communication. Data analysis revealed improved self-efficacy of knowledge of the anatomy and the surgical procedures, confidence in treating patients undergoing those surgeries, and confidence communicating with surgeons, regardless of whether students viewed the surgeries live or recorded. Students participating in this experience expressed a clear value enhancement on their education. Programs should feel confident that this type of experience in the curriculum, whether live or recorded, will have a positive effect on student self-efficacy as related to the relationships and pertinence of anatomical structures involved in the surgeries, the surgical procedures, treating patients having undergone those surgeries, and interprofessional communication.
(© 2023 The Authors. Anatomical Sciences Education published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for Anatomy.)
References: Artino A. Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspect Med Educ. 2012;1(2):76-85.
Bergman EM, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. Why don't they know enough about anatomy? A narrative review. Med Teach. 2011;33:403-409.
Brown T, Cosgriff T, French G. Learning style preferences of occupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech pathology students: a comparative study. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2008;6(3):Article 7.
Burgoon J, Meece J, Granger N. Self-efficacy's influence on student academic achievement in the medical anatomy curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:249-255.
Cake MA. Deep dissection: motivating students beyond rote learning in veterinary anatomy. J Vet Med Educ. 2006;33:266-271.
Cardell S, Krupat E, Ulrich M. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med. 2008;83:1174-1178.
Carroll M, Tracy-Bee M, McKenzie A. Call for consistency: the need to establish gross anatomy learning objectives for the entry-level physical therapist. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(3):1193-1197.
Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151-157.
Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy. School reports. 2023. Available from: http://school.fsbpt.net/report/Viewreport?format=web&id=9904. Accessed 24 May 2023.
Forbes R, Mandrusiak A, Smith M, Russell T. New-graduate physical therapists' self-efficacy to perform patient education is influenced by entry-level training experiences. J Phys Ther Educ. 2018;32(1):46-54.
Good J, Ramos D, D'Amore D. Learning style preferences and academic success of preclinical allied health students. J Allied Health. 2013;42(4):e81-e90.
Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38.
Human Tissue Authority. Disposal of anatomical specimens, former anatomical specimens and body parts FAQs. London, England. 2004. Available from: https://www.hta.gov.uk/guidance-professionals/regulated-sectors/anatomy/disposal-anatomical-specimens-former-anatomical-0. Accessed 20 Dec 2022.
Husmann PR, O'Loughlin VD. Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparities among undergraduate anatomy Students' study strategies, class performance, and reported VARK learning styles. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(1):6-19.
Jeyakumar A, Dissanayake B, Dissabandara D. Dissection in the modern medical curriculum: an exploration into student perception and adaptions for the future. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13:363-377.
Jordan DJ, Griffin M, Phillips B, Hindocha S, Elgawad A. Teaching anatomy: dissecting its delivery in medical education. 2016. Available from: https://benthamopen.com/FULLTEXT/MEDJ-3-312. Accessed 24 Oct 2019.
Karbasi Z, Niakan Kalhori SR. Application and evaluation of virtual technologies for anatomy education to medical students: a review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:163.
Khanal L, Shah S, Koirala S. Exploration of preferred learning styles in medical education using VARK modal. Russ Open Med J. 2014;3:0305.
Lazarus M, Chinchilli V, Leong S, Kauffman G. Perceptions of anatomy: critical components in the clinical setting. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(4):187-199.
Minhao H, Wattchow D, de Fontgalland D. From ancient to avant-Garde: a review of traditional and modern multimodal approaches to surgical anatomy education. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(3):146-151.
Nicholson L, Reed D, Chan C. An interactive, multi-modal anatomy workshop improves academic performance in the health sciences: a cohort study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:7.
Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Eng Educ. 2004;93:223-231.
Selcuk I, Tatar I, Huri E. Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;16:72-75.
Silberman N, Litwin B, Panzarella K, Fernandez-Fernandez A. High Fidelity human simulation improves physical therapist student self-efficacy for acute care clinical practice. J Phys Ther Educ. 2015;29(4):14-24.
Venskus DG, Craig JA. Development and validation of a self-efficacy scale for clinical reasoning in physical therapists. J Phys Ther Educ. 2017;31(1):14-20.
Wilson AB, Miller CH, Klein BA, Taylor MA, Goodwin M, Boyle E, et al. A meta-analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies. Clin Anat. 2018;31:122-133.
معلومات مُعتمدة: Wingate University Board of Visitors
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: anatomic donor; cadaver; education; physical therapy; self-efficacy; surgery
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230718 Date Completed: 20231102 Latest Revision: 20231102
رمز التحديث: 20231215
DOI: 10.1002/ase.2315
PMID: 37462241
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1935-9780
DOI:10.1002/ase.2315