دورية أكاديمية

The role of psychosocial risks in burnout, psychosomatic disorders, and job satisfaction: lineal models vs a QCA approach in non-university teachers.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The role of psychosocial risks in burnout, psychosomatic disorders, and job satisfaction: lineal models vs a QCA approach in non-university teachers.
المؤلفون: Llorca-Pellicer M; Unidad de Investigación Psicosocial de la Conducta Organizacional (UNIPSICO), Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain., Gil-LaOrden P; Unidad de Investigación Psicosocial de la Conducta Organizacional (UNIPSICO), Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.; Department of Social Psychology, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain., Prado-Gascó VJ; Department of Social Psychology, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain., Gil-Monte PR; Unidad de Investigación Psicosocial de la Conducta Organizacional (UNIPSICO), Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.; Department of Social Psychology, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.
المصدر: Psychology & health [Psychol Health] 2023 Sep 04, pp. 1-15. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 04.
Publication Model: Ahead of Print
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Routledge Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8807983 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1476-8321 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08870446 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Psychol Health Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: <2010-> : Abingdon, Oxon : Routledge
Original Publication: Chur ; New York : Harwood Academic Publishers ; London : distributed by STBS Ltd., c1987-
مستخلص: This study aims to assess the effect of psychosocial risks and resources on burnout, psychosomatic disorders, and job satisfaction using Hierarchical Regression Modelling (HRM) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).
Method: The sample consisted of 9020 non-university public education teachers ( M age  = 45.33 years, SD  = 9.15; 72.5% women).
Results: Demands variables (Workload, Emotional labour, Imbalance, and Interpersonal conflict) were better predictors than resources variables (Job autonomy, Social support, and Resources at work). Resources also significantly improved the model's predictive capacity, except in the case of Indolence. In the QCA results, none of the conditions seems to be necessary. Regarding sufficiency, the combination of the different conditions explains between 44-49% of high levels of Burnout and between 40-47% of low levels of Burnout; between 44-47% of high levels of Psychosomatic disorders and 40-47% of low levels of Psychosomatic disorders; 49% of high Job satisfaction levels and 45-56% of low Job satisfaction levels.
Conclusions: The results show that QCA models have better explanatory capacity than HRM. Some variables were not significant in HRM, but they were present in combination with other QCA model variables. The findings contribute to understanding how psychosocial risks affect workers' health and job satisfaction.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Burnout; job satisfaction; psychosomatic disorders; qualitative comparative analysis
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20230905 Latest Revision: 20230905
رمز التحديث: 20230905
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2253258
PMID: 37667484
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1476-8321
DOI:10.1080/08870446.2023.2253258