دورية أكاديمية
The validity of a single inertial sensor to assess cervical active range of motion.
العنوان: | The validity of a single inertial sensor to assess cervical active range of motion. |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | English DJ; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: d.english@latrobe.edu.au., Weerakkody N; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia., Zacharias A; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia., Green RA; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia., Hocking C; The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Bini RR; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia. |
المصدر: | Journal of biomechanics [J Biomech] 2023 Oct; Vol. 159, pp. 111781. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Sep 09. |
نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
اللغة: | English |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Elsevier Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0157375 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-2380 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00219290 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Biomech Subsets: MEDLINE |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: New York ; Oxford : Elsevier Science |
مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Cervical Vertebrae* , Neck*, Male ; Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Neck Pain/diagnosis |
مستخلص: | Cervical active range of motion (AROM) is an important outcome measure for clinicians working with a range of patient populations, especially people with neck pain. Multi-sensor inertial measurement unit (IMU) devices demonstrate good validity in the research laboratory but are expensive and not easily accessible in clinical settings. The use of single-IMU devices has been proposed but their validity for measuring cervical AROM is unknown. A concurrent and content validity study was conducted, comparing accuracy of single-IMU NeckCare Pro™ with multi-IMU Xsens™ for measuring cervical AROM in healthy adults (8 males, 7 females, mean age 30.6 years [SD 10.4]). Cervical AROM was assessed for flexion, extension, rotation (right and left), and lateral flexion (right and left), whereby six repetitions were performed for each movement with the subjects strapped to a high-back chair. Regarding content validity, Xsens™ detected a small amount of thoracic movement that could not be detected by the NeckCare Pro™ during cervical AROM testing, with means ranging from 1.5° to 4.1°. However, this did not significantly impact concurrent validity, which was good for all movements (ICC 0.764 - 0.966). This paper found that single-IMU technology (NeckCare Pro™) had good validity for measuring cervical AROM in healthy adults when subjects were strapped to a chair to limit trunk movement. Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.) |
فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Assessment; Cervical; Clinical; Sensors; Validity |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20230911 Date Completed: 20231002 Latest Revision: 20231002 |
رمز التحديث: | 20240628 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111781 |
PMID: | 37696236 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
تدمد: | 1873-2380 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111781 |