دورية أكاديمية
Practice of laparoscopic prolapse surgery in Europe - ESGE Survey.
| العنوان: | Practice of laparoscopic prolapse surgery in Europe - ESGE Survey. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Lambert B, de Landsheere L, Noé GK, Devassy R, Ferreira H, Dubuisson J, Deprest J, Botchorishvili R |
| المصدر: | Facts, views & vision in ObGyn [Facts Views Vis Obgyn] 2023 Sep; Vol. 15 (3), pp. 269-276. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Flemish Society of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Country of Publication: Belgium NLM ID: 101578773 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2032-0418 (Print) Linking ISSN: 20320418 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Facts Views Vis Obgyn Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: [St-Niklaas, Belgium] : Flemish Society of Obstetrics & Gynaecology |
| مستخلص: | Sacrocolpopexy is considered as the "gold standard" for management of women with apical prolapse. Numerous technical variants are being practiced. The first aim of this survey was to determine the habits of practice of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) in Europe. The second aim was to determine whether surgeons who perform laparoscopic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair are familiar with the practice of alternative techniques and with mesh-less laparoscopic treatment of prolapse. The questionnaire was designed by the Urogynaecology Special Interest Group of the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE). All ESGE-members were invited by email to respond to this survey consisting of 54 questions divided in different categories. Following review of ESGE member's responses, we have highlighted the great heterogeneity concerning the practice of LSCP and important variability in performance of concomitant surgeries. Alternative techniques are rarely used in practice. Furthermore, the lack of standardisation of the many surgical steps of a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is mainly due to the lack of evidence. There is a need for training and teaching in both standard and newer innovative techniques as well as the reporting of medium and long-term outcomes of both standard laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and any of its alternatives. |
| References: | Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5647-5655. (PMID: 27287895) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8:CD013108. (PMID: 30121956) Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Nov;37(8):2335-2345. (PMID: 30024069) Urology. 2021 Apr;150:110-115. (PMID: 32827535) Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13(4):256-60; discussion 260. (PMID: 12189431) Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):139-145. (PMID: 31191848) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD004014. (PMID: 23633316) Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Oct;205:60-5. (PMID: 27566224) J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):49-55. (PMID: 18262144) Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1685-1693. (PMID: 28417156) Perm J. 2014 Fall;18(4):40-4. (PMID: 25662525) Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1783-90. (PMID: 24142054) Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1089-103. (PMID: 19201521) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20230924 Latest Revision: 20231116 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20231116 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC10643013 |
| DOI: | 10.52054/FVVO.15.3.087 |
| PMID: | 37742204 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
| تدمد: | 2032-0418 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.52054/FVVO.15.3.087 |