دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

On the determinants of anti-COVID restriction and anti-vaccine movements: the case of IoApro in Italy.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: On the determinants of anti-COVID restriction and anti-vaccine movements: the case of IoApro in Italy.
المؤلفون: Alfano V; DiSEGIM, University of Napoli Parthenope, Naples, Italy. vincenzo.alfano@uniparthenope.it.; Center for Economic Studies - CES-Ifo, Munich, Germany. vincenzo.alfano@uniparthenope.it., Capasso S; Department of Human and Social Sciences, Italian National Research Council, Rome, Italy.; University of Napoli Parthenope, Naples, Italy.; CSEF, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy., Limosani M; Department of Economics, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
المصدر: Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2023 Oct 05; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 16784. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 05.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Anti-Vaccination Movement* , COVID-19*/epidemiology , COVID-19*/prevention & control, Humans ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Italy ; Commerce ; Health Facilities ; Vaccination
مستخلص: Following restrictions to control the spread of COVID-19, and subsequent vaccination campaigns, sentiments against such policies were quick to arise. While individual-level determinants that led to such attitudes have drawn much attention, there are also reasons to believe that the macro context in which these movements arose may contribute to their evolution. In this study, exploiting data on business activities which supported a major Italian anti-restriction and anti-vaccine movement, IoApro, using quantitative analysis that employs both a fractional response probit and logit model and a beta regression model, we investigate the relationship between socio-economic characteristics, institutional quality, and the flourishing of this movement. Our results suggest a U-shaped relationship between income and the proliferation of the movement, meaning that support for these movements increases the greater the degree of economic decline. Our results further indicate that the share of the population between 40 and 60 years old is positively related to support for such movements, as is institutional corruption.
(© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)
References: Burgess, R. A. et al. The COVID-19 vaccines rush: Participatory community engagement matters more than ever. Lancet 397(10268), 8–10 (2021). (PMID: 3330848410.1016/S0140-6736(20)32642-8)
Blume, S. Anti-vaccination movements and their interpretations. Soc. Sci. Med. 62(3), 628–642 (2006). (PMID: 1603976910.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.020)
Kata, A. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm—An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine 30(25), 3778–3789 (2012). (PMID: 2217250410.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112)
Rosiello, F. & D’Oca, E. Vaccinations and the movement of antivaccers. Eur. J. Public Health 30(Supplement_5), ckaa166-700 (2020). (PMID: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.700)
Alfano, V. & Ercolano, S. Your vaccine attitude determines your altitude. What are the determinants of attitudes toward vaccination?. Vaccine 40(48), 6987–6997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.038 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.038363747099614527)
Goel, R. K. & Jones, J. R. Managing the risk of COVID-19 via vaccine passports: Modeling economic and policy implications. Manag. Decis. Econ. 43, 1–9 (2022). (PMID: 10.1002/mde.3546)
Rodríguez-Pose, A. The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 11(1), 189–209 (2018). (PMID: 10.1093/cjres/rsx024)
Florida, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Storper, M. Critical commentary: Cities in a post-COVID world. Urban Stud. 60(8), 1509–1531 (2023). (PMID: 10.1177/00420980211018072)
Dijkstra, L., Poelman, H. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. The geography of EU discontent. Reg. Stud. 54(6), 737–753 (2020). (PMID: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603)
Neumayer, E., Pfaff, K. & Plümper, T. Protest against COVID-19 containment policies in European countries. J. Peace Res. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3844989 (2021). (PMID: 10.2139/ssrn.3844989)
Adamson, C. S. et al. Antiviral drug discovery: Preparing for the next pandemic. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50(6), 3647–3655. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS01118E (2021). (PMID: 10.1039/D0CS01118E33524090)
Simpson, S., Kaufmann, M. C., Glozman, V. & Chakrabarti, A. Disease X: Accelerating the development of medical countermeasures for the next pandemic. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20(5), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30123-7 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30123-7)
Hotez, P. J. Preventing the Next Pandemic: Vaccine Diplomacy in a Time of Anti-Science (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021). (PMID: 10.56021/9781421440392)
McMahon, T. F. Models of the relationship of the firm to society. J. Bus. Eth. 5(3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383624 (1986). (PMID: 10.1007/BF00383624)
Alfano, V., Ercolano, S. & Pinto, M. Fighting the COVID pandemic: National policy choices in non-pharmaceutical interventions. J. Policy Model. 44(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.11.003 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.11.003350349998750834)
Ciminelli, G. & Garcia-Mandicó, S. COVID-19 in Italy: An analysis of death registry data. J. Public Health 42(4), 723–730 (2020). (PMID: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa165)
Cobre, A. D. et al. A multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with death by Covid-19 in the USA, Italy, Spain, and Germany. J. Public Health (Berl.) 30, 1189–1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01397-7 (2022). (PMID: 10.1007/s10389-020-01397-7)
SVIMEZ Rapporto SVIMEZ 2021 sull’economia e la società del mezzogiorno. Il Mulino (2021).
Chintalapuli, N., Gopi, B. & Francesco, A. COVID-19 virus outbreak forecasting of registered and recovered cases after sixty day lockdown in Italy: a data driven model approach. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 53(3), 396–403 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.04.004)
Alfano, V., Cicatiello, L. & Ercolano, S. School openings and the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. A provincial-level analysis using the synthetic control method. Health Policy 125(9), 1200–1207 (2021). (PMID: 34247845844340410.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.010)
Alfano, V. & Ercolano, S. Back to school or back to lockdown? The effects of opening schools on the diffusion of COVID-19 in Italian regions. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 82, 101260 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101260)
Campanozzi, L.L., Tambone, V. & Ciccozzi, M. A Lesson from the Green Pass Experience in Italy: A Narrative Review. Vaccines. 10(9), 1483 (2022). (PMID: 36146561950518610.3390/vaccines10091483)
Puhach, O. et al. Infectious viral load in unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals infected with ancestral, Delta or Omicron SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 28, 1491–1500 (2022). (PMID: 3539515110.1038/s41591-022-01816-0)
Acharya, C. B. et al. Viral Load Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated, Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Persons Infected With the SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant. Open Forum Infect Dis. 9(5), ofac135 (2022). (PMID: 35479304899225010.1093/ofid/ofac135)
Singanayagam, A. et al. Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study. The Lancet. Infectious diseases. 22(2), 183–195 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00648-4)
Jung, J. et al. Transmission and Infectious SARS-CoV-2 Shedding Kinetics in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Individuals. JAMA Netw Open. 5(5), e2213606 (2022). (PMID: 35608859913174410.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13606)
La Rocca, G., Boccia Artieri, G. & Greco, F. From #iononriapro to #ioapro: analysing hashtag activism in the Italian restaurant Twittersphere during the 2020 lockdown. Online Inf. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2022-0390 (2023). (PMID: 10.1108/OIR-07-2022-0390)
Lovari, A., Martino, V. & Righetti, N. Blurred shots: Investigating the information crisis around vaccination in Italy. Am. Behav. Sci. 65(2), 351–370 (2021). (PMID: 10.1177/0002764220910245)
Bersani, G. L’altra epidemia. Riv. Psichiatr. 57(2), 101–105 (2022). (PMID: 35426429)
DiRusso, C. & Stansberry, K. Unvaxxed: A cultural study of the online anti-vaccination movement. Qual. Health Res. 32(2), 317–329 (2022). (PMID: 3484782110.1177/10497323211056050)
Goel, R. K, Sauronis, J. W. Explaining Vaccine Hesitancy: A Covid-19 Study of the United States. CESifo Working Paper No. 9658 (2022).
Machingaidze, S. & Wiysonge, C. S. Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Nat. Med. 27, 1338–1339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01459-7 (2021). (PMID: 10.1038/s41591-021-01459-734272500)
Farah, Y. et al. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United States: A systematic review. Front. Public Health https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.770985 (2021). (PMID: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.770985339967148119747)
Alfano, V. & Ercolano, S. Social capital, quality of institutions and lockdown. Evidence from Italian provinces. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 59, 31–41 (2021). (PMID: 35317310865126010.1016/j.strueco.2021.08.001)
Alfano, V. Work ethics, stay-at-home measures and COVID-19 diffusion. Eur. J. Health Econ. 23, 893–901 (2022). (PMID: 3474168610.1007/s10198-021-01402-0)
Alfano, V. Does social capital enforce social distancing? The role of bridging and bonding social capital in the evolution of the pandemic. Econ. Polit. 39, 839–859 (2022). (PMID: 10.1007/s40888-021-00255-3)
Brauner, J. M. et al. Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19. Science 371, eabd9338. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd9338 (2021). (PMID: 10.1126/science.abd933833323424)
Chan, L. Y., Yuan, B. & Convertino, M. COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical intervention portfolio effectiveness and risk communication predominance. Sci. Rep. 11, 10605 (2021). (PMID: 34012040813463710.1038/s41598-021-88309-1)
Haug, N. et al. Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 1303–1312 (2020). (PMID: 3319985910.1038/s41562-020-01009-0)
Mendez-Brito, A., El Bcheraoui, C. & Pozo-Martin, F. Systematic review of empirical studies comparing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19. J. Infect. 83(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.06.018 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.06.018341618188214911)
Sharma, M. et al. Understanding the effectiveness of government interventions against the resurgence of COVID-19 in Europe. Nat. Commun. 12, 5820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26013-4 (2021). (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-021-26013-4346111588492703)
Cummings, K. M., Jette, A. M., Brock, B. M. & Haefner, D. P. Psychosocial determinants of immunization behavior in a swine influenza campaign. Med. Care 17, 639–649 (1979). (PMID: 22175910.1097/00005650-197906000-00008)
Durbach, N. ‘They might as well brand us’: Working-class resistance to compulsory vaccination in Victorian England. Soc. Hist. Med. 13(1), 45–63 (2000). (PMID: 1162442510.1093/shm/13.1.45)
Lazarus, J. V. et al. Hesitant or not? The association of age, gender, and education with potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine: A country-level analysis. J. Health Commun. 25(10), 799–807 (2020). (PMID: 3371988110.1080/10810730.2020.1868630)
Neumann-Böhme, S. et al. Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Eur. J. Health Econ. 21(7), 977–982 (2020). (PMID: 32591957731726110.1007/s10198-020-01208-6)
Peretti-Watel, P. et al. Attitudes toward vaccination and the H1N1 vaccine: Poor peo’le’s unfounded fears or legitimate concerns of the elite?. Soc. Sci. Med. 109, 10–18 (2014). (PMID: 2468123910.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.035)
Siciliani, L. et al. Strengthening Vaccination programmes and health systems in the European Union: A Framework for Action (Health Policy, 2020).
Caferra, R., Colasante, A. & Morone, A. The less you burn, the more we earn: The role of social and political trust on energy-saving behaviour in Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 71, 101812 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101812)
Ercolano, S. Italian dualism in foreign schol’rs’ analyses. Riv. Econ. Mezzog. 26(3), 411–444 (2012).
Banfield, E. G. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society (Free Press, 1958).
Crescenzi, R., Gagliardi, L. & Percoco, M. Social capital and the innovative performance of Italian provinces. Environ. Plan. A 45(4), 908–929 (2013). (PMID: 10.1068/a45221)
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. The role of social capital in financial development. Am. Econ. Rev. 94(3), 526–556 (2004). (PMID: 10.1257/0002828041464498)
Helliwell, J. F. & Putnam, R. D. Economic growth and social capital in Italy. East. Econ. J. 21(3), 295–307 (1995).
Leonardi, R. Regional development in Italy: Social capital and the Mezzogiorno. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 11(2), 165–179 (1995). (PMID: 10.1093/oxrep/11.2.165)
Putnam, R. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, 1993).
Nifo, A. & Vecchione, G. Do institutions play a role in skilled migration? The case of Italy. Reg. Stud. 48(10), 1628–1649 (2014). (PMID: 10.1080/00343404.2013.835799)
Nifo, A. & Vecchione, G. Measuring institutional quality in Italy. Riv. Econ. Mezzog. 29(1–2), 157–182 (2015).
Lasagni, A., Nifo, A. & Vecchione, G. Firm productivity and institutional quality: Evidence from Italian industry. J. Reg. Sci. 55(5), 774–800 (2015). (PMID: 10.1111/jors.12203)
Czarnek, G. Kossowska, M., Szwed, P. Political ideology and attitudes toward vaccination: Study report. Working paper (2020).
Larson, H., de Figueiredo, A., Karafillakis, E. & Rawal, M. State of Vaccine Confidence in the EU 2018 (European Commission, 2020).
Hak, E., Schönbeck, Y., De Melker, H., Van Essen, G. A. & Sanders, E. A. Negative attitude of highly educated parents and health care workers towards future vaccinations in the Dutch childhood vaccination program. Vaccine 23(24), 3103–3107 (2005). (PMID: 1583720810.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.074)
Gilkey, M. B. et al. The vaccination confidence scale: A brief measure of parents’ vaccination beliefs. Vaccine 32(47), 6259–6265 (2014). (PMID: 25258098441854610.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.007)
Spaccatini, F., Giovannelli, I. & Pacilli, M. G. Special issue: Ageism toward older adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Soc. Issues 78(4), 769–789 (2022). (PMID: 10.1111/josi.12537)
Gerace, A., Rigney, G. & Anderson, J. R. Predicting attitudes towards easing COVID-19 restrictions in the United States of America: The role of health concerns, demographic, political, and individual difference factors. PLoS One 17(2), e0263128 (2022). (PMID: 35196316886568410.1371/journal.pone.0263128)
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M. The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430 (2010).
Papke, L. E. & Wooldridge, J. M. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. J. Appl. Econom. 11, 619–632 (1996). (PMID: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1)
Papke, L. E. & Wooldridge, J. M. Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. J. Econom. 145, 121–133 (2008). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.009)
Wooldridge, J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data 2nd edn. (MIT Press, 2010).
Huber, P. J. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability Vol. 1 (ed. Huber, P. J.) 221–233 (University of California Press, 1967).
White, H. L. Jr. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48, 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934 (1980). (PMID: 10.2307/1912934)
White, H. L. Jr. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912526 (1982). (PMID: 10.2307/1912526)
Ferrari, S. L. P. & Cribari-Neto, F. Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. J. Appl. Stat. 31, 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501 (2004). (PMID: 10.1080/0266476042000214501)
Smithson, M. & Verkuilen, J. A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychol. Methods 11, 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.54 (2006). (PMID: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.5416594767)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231005 Date Completed: 20231102 Latest Revision: 20231119
رمز التحديث: 20231215
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10556032
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42133-x
PMID: 37798271
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-42133-x