دورية أكاديمية

Recognition memory: The probe, the returned signal, and the decision.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Recognition memory: The probe, the returned signal, and the decision.
المؤلفون: Humphreys MS; Department of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia., Hockley WE; Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. whockley@wlu.ca., Chalmers KA; Department of Psychology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
المصدر: Psychonomic bulletin & review [Psychon Bull Rev] 2024 Apr; Vol. 31 (2), pp. 568-598. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 06.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Review; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer] Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9502924 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1531-5320 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10699384 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Psychon Bull Rev Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: <2013-> : [New York : Springer]
Original Publication: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society, Inc., c1994-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Recognition, Psychology*/physiology , Decision Making*/physiology , Signal Detection, Psychological*/physiology, Humans ; Association Learning/physiology ; Mental Recall/physiology
مستخلص: In an attempt to better understand recognition memory we look at how three approaches (dual processing, signal detection, and global matching) have addressed the probe, the returned signal and the decision in four recognition paradigms. These are single-item recognition (including the remember/know paradigm), recognition in relational context, associative recognition, and source monitoring. The contrast, with regards to the double-miss rate (the probability of recognizing neither item in intact and rearranged pairs) and the effect of the oldness of the other member of the test pair, between identifying the old words in test pairs (the relational context paradigm) and first identifying the intact test pairs and then identifying the old words (adding associative recognition to the relational context paradigm) suggests that the retrieval of associative information in the relational context paradigm is unintentional, unlike the retrieval of associative information in associative recognition. It also seems possible that the information that is spontaneously retrieved in single-item recognition, possibly including the remember/know paradigm, is also unintentional, unlike the retrieval of information in source monitoring. Probable differences between intentional and unintentional retrieval, together with the pattern of effects with regards to the double-miss rate and the effect of the other member of the test pair, are used to evaluate the three approaches. Our conclusion is that all three approaches have something valid to say about recognition, but none is equally applicable across all four paradigms.
(© 2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.)
References: Anderson, R. C., & Hidde, J. L. (1971). Imagery and sentence learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 526-530.
Anisfeld, M., & Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 171–179. (PMID: 5655107)
Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Vol. 1. Learning, memory, and thinking (pp. 243-293). Freeman.
Aue, W. R., Criss, A. H., & Fischetti, N. W. (2012). Associative information in memory: Evidence from cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 109-222.
Bain, J. D., & Humphreys, M. S. (1988). Relational context: Independent cues, meanings or configurations? In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 97-137). John Wiley & Sons.
Bain, J. D., & Humphreys, M. S. (1989). Instructional reinstatement of context: The forgotten prerequisite. In K. McConkey and A. Bennett (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXIV International Congress of Psychology, Vol. 3. (pp. 227-235). Elsevier.
Baumann, O., McFadyen, J., & Humphreys, M. S. (under review). Behavioral and neural evidence of unitized object-background associations for unfamiliar stimuli.
Begg, I. (1982). Imagery, organization, and discriminative processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 273-290.
Bernstein, I. H., & Welch, K. R. (1991). Awareness, false recognition, and the Jacoby-Whitehouse effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 324-328.
Brown, M.W. & Aggleton J.P. (2001). Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nature Reviews of Neuroscience, 2, 51-61. (PMID: 11253359)
Buchler, N. G., Faunce, P., Light, L. L., Gottfredson, N., & Reder, L. M. (2011). Effects of repetition on associative recognition in young and older adults: Item and associative strengthening. Psychology and Aging, 26, 111–126. (PMID: 209736093046221)
Buchler, N. G., Light, L. L., & Reder, L. M. (2008). Memory for items and associations: Distinct representations and processes in associative recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 183-199. (PMID: 186774242493415)
Burt, J. S. & Humphreys, M. S. (1993) Delayed priming of the pronunciation of inconsistent words and pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 743-765.
Butterworth, P. (2000). Task by material interactions characterize unitization in episodic memory. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Queensland.
Chalmers, K. A., & Humphreys, M. S. (2003). Experimental manipulation of prior experience: Effects on item and associative recognition. Memory, 11, 233–246. (PMID: 12908673)
Chappell, M. & Humphreys, M. S. (1994). An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall. Psychological Review, 101, 103-128.
Cohn, M. & Moscovitch, M. (2007). Dissociating measures of associative memory: Evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 436-454.
Conway, M. A., Dewhurst, S. A., Pearson, N., & Sapute, A. (2001). The self and recollection reconsidered: How a “failure to replicate” failed and why trace strength accounts of recollection are untenable. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(6), 673–686.
Cox, G. E., & Criss, A. H. (2017). Similarity leads to correlated processing: A dynamic model of encoding and recognition of episodic associations. Psychological Review, 127(5), 792-828.
Cox, G. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2017). A dynamic approach to recognition memory. Psychological Review, 124(6), 795-860. (PMID: 29106269)
Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review, 111, 800–807. (PMID: 15250785)
Dalton, P. (1993). The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition. Memory & Cognition, 21, 223-234.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22. (PMID: 13664879)
Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic recognition memory. Psychological Review. 108, 452-478. (PMID: 11381837)
Diana, R.A., Reder, L.M., Arndt, J., & Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 1-21.
Diana, R.A., Yonelinas, A.P., & Ranganath, C. (2007). Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three-component model. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 379-86.
Dobbins, I. G., Khoe, W., Yonelinas, A. P., & Kroll, N. E. A. (2000). Predicting individual false alarm rates and signal detection theory: A role for remembering. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1347–1356.
Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 523-533.
Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review, 111, 524-542. (PMID: 15065921)
Dunn, J. C. (2008). The dimensionality of the remember-know task: A state-trace analysis. Psychological Review, 115, 426-446. (PMID: 18426296)
Dyne, A. M. (1992). An evaluation of the global matching models of recognition memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Queensland, Australia.
Eckert, E., & Kanak, J. N. (1974). Verbal discrimination learning: A review of the acquisition, transfer, and retention literature. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 582-607.
Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 627-661.
Ekstrand, B. R., Wallace, W. P., & Underwood, B. J. (1966). A frequency theory of verbal discrimination learning. Psychological Review, 73, 566-578. (PMID: 5978999)
Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 120-128. (PMID: 14736301)
Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309–313.
Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 24, 523-533.
Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67. (PMID: 6571421)
Glenberg, A., & Adams, F. (1978). Type I rehearsal and recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 455-463.
Glenberg, A., Smith, S. M., & Green, C. (1977). Type I rehearsal: Maintenance and more. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 339-352.
Greene, R.L. (1990). Spacing effects on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1004-1011.
Gruppuso, V., Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1997). The process dissociation procedure and similarity: Defining and estimating recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 259-278.
Haskins, A. L., Yonelinas, A. P., Quamme, J. R., & Ranganath, C. (2008). Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations. Neuron, 59, 554-560. (PMID: 18760692)
Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 16, 96-101.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). Schema abstraction in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528–551.
Hintzman, D.L. (2004). Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: Repetition and recursive reminding. Memory & Cognition, 32, 336–350.
Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval constraints and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 275–289.
Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., & Levitin, D. J. (1998). Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall. Memory & Cognition, 26, 449–462.
Hirshman, E. (1998). On the utility of the signal detection model of the remember-know paradigm. Consciousness & Cognition, 7, 103–107.
Hirshman, E., & Master, S. (1997). Modeling the conscious correlations of recognition: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 25, 345–351.
Hockley, W.E., & Bancroft, T.D. (2011). Extensions of the picture superiority effect in associative recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 236-244. (PMID: 21728402)
Horowitz, L. M., & Manelis, L. (1973). Recognition and cued recall of idioms and phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 291–296.
Horowitz, L. W., & Manelis, L. (1972). Toward a theory of redintegrative memory: Adjective-noun phrases. In Bower, G. H. & Spence, J. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 6 (pp. 193-224). Academic Press.
Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269–299.
Humphreys, K. R., Menzies, H., & Lake, J. K. (2010). Repeated speech errors: Evidence for learning. Cognition, 117, 151-165. (PMID: 20801433)
Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 4, 221-232.
Humphreys, M. S. (1978). Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 179-187.
Humphreys, M. S., & Bain, J. D. (1983). Recognition memory: A cue and information analysis. Memory & Cognition, 11, 583-600.
Humphreys, M.S., Bain, J.D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.
Humphreys, M. S., & Bowyer, P. A. (1981) Cued recall and cue recognition: How similar are the processes. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 65-84.
Humphreys, M. S., & Chalmers, K. A. (2016). Thinking about human memory. Cambridge University Press.
Humphreys, M. S., Cornwell, T. B., McAlister, A. R., Kelly, S. J., Quinn, E. A., & Murray, K. L. (2010). Sponsorship, ambushing and counter-strategy: Effects upon memory for sponsor and event, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 96-108. (PMID: 20350047)
Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., Chalmers, K. A., & Finnigan, S. (2000). Dual processes in recognition: Does a focus on measurement operations provide a sufficient foundation? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 593-603. (PMID: 11206200)
Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., Maguire, A. M. Reynolds, K., Bolland, S. W. & Hughes, J. (2003). What you get out of memory depends on the question you ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(50), 797-812. (PMID: 14516214)
Humphreys, M. S., & Hannah (under review). Human memory generates representations that approach amodality.
Humphreys, M. S., Li, Y. R., Burt, J. S., Loft, S. (2020). How semantic processing Affects recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 113, 1-10.
Humphreys, M. S., McFarlane, K. A., Burt, J. S., Kelly, S. J., Weatherall, K. G., & Burrell, R. G. (2017). Recognition in context: Implications for trade mark law. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1665–1672.
Humphreys, M. S., Murray, K, L., & Maguire, A. M. (2009). Contexts and control operations used in accessing list-specific. Generalized, and semantic memories. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 311-337. (PMID: 19006790)
Humphreys, M. S. & Murray, K. L. (2011). Episodic, generalized and semantic memory tests: Switching and strength effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 192–199. (PMID: 21639611)
Humphreys, M. S., Murray, K. L., & Koh, J. Y. (2014). Reinstating higher order properties of a study list by retrieving a list item. Memory & Cognition, 42, 570-582.
Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., & Tehan, G. (1989). Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 36-67.
Humphreys, M. S., Tehan, G., Bauman, O. & Loft, S. (2020). Explaining short-term memory phenomena with an integrated episodic/semantic theory of long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 123, 101346. (PMID: 32949972)
Humphreys, M. S., Tehan, G., O’Shea, A., & Bolland, S. W. (2000). Target similarity effects: Support for the parallel distributed processing assumptions. Memory & Cognition, 28, 798-811.
Humphreys, M. S., Wiles, J., & Dennis, S. (1994). Toward a theory of human memory: Data structures and access processes. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 655-692.
Inoue, C., & Bellezza, F. S. (1998). The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments. Memory & Cognition, 26, 299–308.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340. (PMID: 6457080)
Jacoby, L. L., Jones, T. C., & Dolan, P.O. (1998). Two effects of repetition: support for a dual-process model of know judgments and exclusion errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 705-709.
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326–338.
Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Daniels, K. A., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 852–857.
Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Velanova, K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Age differences in depth of retrieval: Memory for foils. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 493–504.
Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139–154.
Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
Johns, B. T., Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2012). A synchronization account of false recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 486-518. (PMID: 22884279)
Johnston, W. A., Dark, V. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1985). Perceptual fluency and recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 3–11.
Johnston, W. A., Hawley, K. J., & Elliott, J. M. G. (1991). Contribution of Perceptual Fluency to Recognition Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 210-223. (PMID: 1827829)
Kelly, M. A., Mewhort, D. J. K., & West, R. L. (2017). The memory tesseract: Mathematical equivalence between composite and separate storage memory models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 77, 142–155.
Kimball, D. R., Smith, T. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2007). The fSAM model of false recall. Psychological Review, 114, 954–993. (PMID: 179078692839460)
Kintsch, W. (1970). Models for free recall and recognition. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 331-373). Academic Press.
Knowlton, B. J. & Squire, L. R. (1995). Remembering and knowing: Two different expressions of declarative memory. Journal, of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and cognition, 21(3), 699-710. (PMID: 7602267)
Koriat, A. & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Memory metaphors and the real-life laboratory controversy: correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(2), 167-188.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75. (PMID: 11301520)
Light, L. L., & Carter-Sobell, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 1-11.
Maguire, A. M., Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., & Lee, M. D. (2010). Global similarity accounts of embedded-category designs: Tests of the Global Matching models. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 131-148.
Malmberg, K. J. (2008). Recognition memory: A review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 335-384. (PMID: 18485339)
Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 322-336. (PMID: 15755248)
Mandler, G. (1972). Organization and recognition. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of Memory. Academic Press.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O’Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the Hippocampus and Neocortex: Insights from the success and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457. (PMID: 7624455)
McElree, B., Dolan, P.O., & Jacoby, L.L. (1999). Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 563–582. (PMID: 10368927)
Mickes, L., Johnson, J. M., & Wixted, J. T. (2010). Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 843-863. (PMID: 20565205)
Mickes, L., Seale-Carlisle, T.M., & Wixted, J.T. (2013). Rethinking familiarity: Remember/Know judgements in free recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 333–349. (PMID: 236374703637981)
Moran, R., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2015). Old processes, new perspectives: Familiarity is correlated with (not independent of) recollection and is more (not equally) variable for targets than for lures. Cognitive Psychology, 79, 40–67. (PMID: 25899705)
Morton, N. W., & Polyn, S. M. (2016). A predictive framework for evaluating models of semantic organization in free recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 119–140. (PMID: 28331243)
Moss, H. E., Ostrin, R. K., Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). Accessing different types of lexical semantic information: Evidence from priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 863–883.
Mulligan, N. W., & Hirshman, E. (1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process-dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 280-304.
Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
Murdock, B. B., & Kahana, M. J. (1993). Analysis of the list-strength effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 689–697.
Napps, S. E. (1989). Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory & Cognition, 17, 729–739.
Nelson, A. B., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2013). The co-evolution of knowledge and event memory. Psychological Review, 120, 356–394. (PMID: 23458086)
Nelson, D. L., & Goodmon, L. B. (2002). Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words. Memory & Cognition, 30, 380-398.
Nelson, D. L., & McEvoy, C. L. (1979). Effects of retention interval and modality on sensory and sematic trace information. Memory & Cognition, 7, 257–262.
Odegard, T. N., Lampinen, J. M. & Toglia, M. P. (2005). Meanings moderating effect on recollection rejection. Journal, of Memory and Language, 53, 416-429.
Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in Speech production. Cognition, 114, 227–252. (PMID: 19854436)
Osth, A. F. & Dennis, S. (2014). Associative recognition and the list strength paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 42, 583–594.
Overton, R. C., & Adolphson, C. J. (1979). Multiple trace retrieval: A trace-to-trace retrieval process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 485-495.
Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2007). Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted (2007). Psychological Review, 114, 188–201. (PMID: 17227187)
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (p. 145–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), Decade of behavior. On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (p. 67–86). American Psychological Association.
Pike, R. (1984). Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition. Psychological Review, 91, 281–294.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computation principles in quasiregular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115. (PMID: 8650300)
Poldrack, R. A., & Logan, G. (1997). Fluency and response speed in recognition judgments. Memory & Cognition, 25, 1-10.
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. A. (2009). Context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116, 129-56. (PMID: 191591512630591)
Popov, V., & Reder, L. M. (2020). Frequency effects on memory: A resource-limited theory. Psychological Review, 127, 1–46. (PMID: 31524424)
Quamme, J. R., Yonelinas, A.P., & Norman, K. A. (2007). Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia. Hippocampus, 17, 192-200. (PMID: 17203466)
Raaijmakers, J. G. W. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89–102.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., & Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of Remember-Know judgements in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 294-320. (PMID: 10764098)
Reinitz, M. T. & Demb, J. B. (1994). Explicit and implicit memory for compound words. Memory & Cognition, 22, 687-694.
Reinitz, M. T. & Hannigan, S. L. (2004). False memories for compound words: the role of working memory. Memory & Cognition, 32, 463-473.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller and J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, Vol. 8 (pp. 63-131). Elsevier.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
Rotello, C. M. & Heit, E. (2000). Associative recognition: A case of recall to reject processing. Memory & Cognition, 28, 907-922.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Reeder, J. A. (2004). Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal-detection model. Psychological Review, 111, 588-616. (PMID: 15250777)
Russo, R., Ward, G., Geurts, H., & Scheres, A. (1999). When unfamiliarity matters: Changing environmental context between study and test affects recognition memory for unfamiliar stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 488-499.
Sirotin, Y. B., Kimball, D. R., & Kahana, M. J. (2005). Going beyond a single list: Modeling the effects of prior experience on episodic free recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 787–805.
Skinner, E.I. & Fernandes, M.A. (2007). Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2163-2179. (PMID: 17445844)
Slamecka, N. J. (1966). Differentiation versus unlearning of verbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 822-828. (PMID: 5939360)
Smith, C.N., Wixted, J.T., & Squire, L.R. (2011). The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 15693-15702. (PMID: 22049412)
Staresina, B. P., Fell, J., Dunn, J. C., Axmacher, N., Henson, R. (2013). Using state-trace analysis to dissociate the functions of the human hippocampus and perirhinal cortex in recognition memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science United States of America, 110, 3119-3124.
Tehan, G., Humphreys, M. S., Tolan, G. A., & Pitcher, C. (2004). The Role of Context in Producing Item Interactions and False Memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 107-119. (PMID: 14736300)
Thomson, D. M. (1972). Context effects in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 497-511.
Toth, J. & Parks, C. M. (2006). Effects of age on estimated familiarity in the process dissociation procedure: The role of non-criterial recollection. Memory & Cognition, 34, 527-537.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 26, 1-12.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1971). Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 175-184.
Underwood, B.J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129. (PMID: 14315122)
Underwood, B. J. (1983). Conceptual similarity and cumulative proactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 456-461.
Underwood, B. J., & Humphreys, M. (1979). Context change and the role of meaning in word recognition. The American Journal of Psychology, 92, 577-609. (PMID: 532830)
Underwood, B. J., Jesse, F., & Ekstrand, B. R. (1964). Knowledge of rights and wrongs in verbal-discrimination learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 183-186.
Underwood, B. J., & Schulz, R. W. (1960). Meaningfulness and verbal learning. Lippencott.
Wallace, W. P. (1972). Verbal discrimination. CP Duncan, L. Sechrest, & AW Melton, Human memory: Festschrift for Benton J. Underwood. East Norwalk, CT, US: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Whittlesea, B. W., Jacoby, L. L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 716–732.
Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152–176. (PMID: 17227185)
Wixted, J. T. & Mickes, L. (2010). A continuous model of dual process judgment. Psychological Review, 117, 1025-1054. (PMID: 20836613)
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341–1354. (PMID: 7983467)
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747-763.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of thirty years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.
Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5 (1-2), 131-141. (PMID: 8978527)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Dual processing; Global matching; Recognition; Relational context; Signal detection; Unintentional retrieval
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231006 Date Completed: 20240430 Latest Revision: 20240531
رمز التحديث: 20240601
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01955-4
PMID: 37803230
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1531-5320
DOI:10.3758/s13423-021-01955-4