دورية أكاديمية

One-year healthcare costs after robotic-assisted and laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy: a cohort study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: One-year healthcare costs after robotic-assisted and laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy: a cohort study.
المؤلفون: Okhawere KE; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6Th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA. kennedy.okhawere@mountsinai.org., Milky G; Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA., Razdan S; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6Th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA., Shih IF; Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA., Li Y; Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA., Zuluaga L; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6Th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA., Badani KK; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1425 Madison Avenue, 6Th Floor, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
المصدر: BMC health services research [BMC Health Serv Res] 2023 Oct 14; Vol. 23 (1), pp. 1099. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 14.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Robotic Surgical Procedures* , Kidney Neoplasms*/surgery , Laparoscopy*, Humans ; Cohort Studies ; Aftercare ; Patient Discharge ; Nephrectomy ; Health Care Costs ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
مستخلص: Objective: Despite the wide-spread adoption of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), the cost-benefit implications for partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) versus laparoscopic surgery (Lap) is not well established. We sought to examine the trend of adoption and 1-year healthcare expenditure of PN and RN, and compare 1-year expenditures of RAS versus Lap for PN and RN.
Patients and Methods: This cohort study used the Merative TM MarketScan® Databases between 2013 and 2020. A total of 5,353 patients with kidney cancer undergoing PN (2,980, 55.7%) or RN (2,373, 44.3%). We compared open-conversion, length of stay (LOS), index expenditure, 1-year healthcare expenditure and utilization, and missed work-days between RAS and Lap for PN and RN.
Results: Adoption of PN increased overtime (47.0% to 55.8%), mainly driven by robotic PN increase. Among PN, RAS had lower open-conversion, shorter LOS and lower index expenditure than Lap. Among RN, RAS had shorter LOS, and similar open-conversion and index expenditures. During 1-year post-discharge, RAS had lower hospital outpatient visits (IRR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.85, 0.99, p = 0.029) and office-based visits (IRR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.86, 0.96, p = 0.002) for PN, translating to a 1-day less (95% CI = 0.25, 1.75, p = 0.008) missed from work for RAS. Following RN, RAS had lower 1-year readmission than Lap (O.R = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55, 0.94, p = 0.018). RAS and Lap had comparable 1-year post-discharge expenditures for both PN (mean difference, MD = -$475, 95% CI = -$4362, $3412, p = 0.810) and RN (MD = -$4,204, 95% CI = -$13,837, $5430, p = 0.404).
Conclusion: At index surgery, RAS was associated with shorter LOS for both PN and RN, and lower open-conversion and expenditures for PN. RAS and Lap had comparable 1-year total expenditures, despite lower healthcare visits for RAS.
(© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)
References: Leow JJ, Heah NH, Chang SL, Chong YL, Png KS. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: an updated meta-analysis of 4,919 patients. J Urol. 2016;196(5):1371–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.011 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.01127291654)
Zargar H, Allaf ME, Bhayani S, et al. Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi-institutional study. BJU Int. 2015;116(3):407–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12933 . (PMID: 10.1111/bju.1293325220543)
Cheung H, Wang Y, Chang SL, Khandwala Y, Del Giudice F, Chung BI. Adoption of robot-assisted partial nephrectomies: a population-based analysis of U.S. surgeons from 2004 to 2013. J Endourol. 2017;31(9):886–892. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0174 .
Okhawere KE, Milky G, Shih I-F, Li Y, Badani KK. Comparison of 1-year health care expenditures and utilization following minimally invasive vs open nephrectomy. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9):e2231885–e2231885. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31885 . (PMID: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31885361123769482061)
Gettman MT, Blute ML, Peschel R, Bartsch G. Current status of robotics in urologic laparoscopy. Eur Urol. 2003;43(2):106–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00579-1 . (PMID: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00579-112565766)
Gershman B, Bukavina L, Chen Z, et al. The association of robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with perioperative outcomes and hospital costs. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(2):305–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.004 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.00430361146)
Jeong IG, Khandwala YS, Kim JH, et al. Association of robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with perioperative outcomes and health care costs, 2003 to 2015. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1561–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14586 . (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2017.14586290674275818800)
Haberal HB, Artykov M, Gudeloglu A, Yazici S, Bilen CY. Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy in the era of robotic surgery. Sisli Etfal Hastan tip Bul. 2021;55(2):167–72. https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2020.33230 . (PMID: 10.14744/SEMB.2020.33230343495918298083)
Golombos DM, Chughtai B, Trinh Q-D, et al. Minimally invasive vs open nephrectomy in the modern era: does approach matter? World J Urol. 2017;35(10):1557–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2040-6 . (PMID: 10.1007/s00345-017-2040-628477204)
Wang Y, Ma X, Huang Q, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumours with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥7: peri-operative and oncological outcomes. BJU Int. 2016;117(1):126–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13214 . (PMID: 10.1111/bju.1321426132424)
Andrade HS, Zargar H, Caputo PA, et al. Five-year oncologic outcomes after transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2016;69(6):1149–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.004 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.00426719014)
Kates M, Ball MW, Patel HD, Gorin MA, Pierorazio PM, Allaf ME. The financial impact of robotic technology for partial and radical nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2015;29(3):317–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0559 . (PMID: 10.1089/end.2014.055925167378)
Chen L, Deng W, Luo Y, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: results from a tertiary referral center. J Endourol. 2022;36(7):941–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0151 . (PMID: 10.1089/end.2020.015133267649)
Golombos DM, Chughtai B, Trinh Q-D, et al. Adoption of technology and its impact on nephrectomy outcomes, a U.S. population-based analysis (2008–2012). J Endourol. 2017;31(1):91–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0643 .
Watson TJ, Qiu J. The Impact of thoracoscopic surgery on payment and health care utilization after lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1271–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.104 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.10426872730)
Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 . (PMID: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.8316224307)
Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5 . (PMID: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-57722560)
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Published online 2021. https://www.r-project.org/ . Accessed 18 Aug 2022.
Jabaji RB, Fischer H, Kern T, Chien GW. Trend of surgical treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma. Perm J. 2019;23:18–108. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/18-108 . (PMID: 10.7812/TPP/18-108310506446499118)
Uzzo RG, Wei JT, Hafez K, Kay R, Novick AC. Comparison of direct hospital costs and length of stay for radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery in the management of localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 1999;54(6):994–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00348-9 . (PMID: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00348-910604696)
Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Shekarriz H, et al. Comparison of costs and complications of radical and partial nephrectomy for treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2002;59(2):211–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01514-x . (PMID: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01514-x11834387)
Alkazemi MH, Dionise ZR, Jiang R, et al. Partial and radical nephrectomy in children, adolescents, and young adults: equivalent readmissions and postoperative complications. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(11):2343–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.05.018 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.05.018311781666879817)
Kim SP, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, et al. Comparative effectiveness for survival and renal function of partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2012;188(1):51–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.006 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.00622591957)
Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(9):735–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70803-8 . (PMID: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70803-8169457682239298)
Yang DY, Monn MF, Bahler CD, Sundaram CP. Does robotic assistance confer an economic benefit during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy? J Urol. 2014;192(3):671–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.018 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.01824747652)
Yu H, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1392–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.089 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.08922341274)
Camp C, O’Hara J, Hughes D, Adshead J. Short-term outcomes and costs following partial nephrectomy in england: a population-based study. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(4):579–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.010 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.01028753878)
Hughes D, Camp C, O’Hara J, Adshead J. Health resource use after robot-assisted surgery vs open and conventional laparoscopic techniques in oncology: analysis of English secondary care data for radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2016;117(6):940–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13401 . (PMID: 10.1111/bju.1340126696305)
Berger I, Xia L, Wirtalla C, Guzzo TJ, Kelz RR. Early discharge after radical nephrectomy: an analysis of complications and readmissions. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(2):e293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2018.11.016 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.11.01630587406)
Bahler CD, Monn MF, Flack CK, Gramm AR, Gardner TA, Sundaram CP. Assessing cost of robotic utilization in partial nephrectomy with increasing utilization. J Endourol. 2018;32(8):710–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0170 . (PMID: 10.1089/end.2018.017029943664)
Dobbs RW, Magnan BP, Abhyankar N, et al. Cost effectiveness and robot-assisted urologic surgery: does it make dollars and sense? Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69(4):313–23. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02866-6 . (PMID: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02866-628008756)
Wallis CJD, Garbens A, Chopra S, Gill IS, Satkunasivam R. Robotic partial nephrectomy: expanding utilization. Advancing innovation. J Endourol. 2017;31(4):348–54. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.063 . (PMID: 10.1089/end.2016.06328117608)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Costs; Expenditures; Kidney cancer; Laparoscopic; Nephrectomy; Robotic
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231014 Date Completed: 20231023 Latest Revision: 20231120
رمز التحديث: 20240628
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10576279
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10111-8
PMID: 37838666
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1472-6963
DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-10111-8