دورية أكاديمية

Poorer outcomes associated with more invasive lead management strategies for Abbott Riata ® leads: a large, multicenter experience.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Poorer outcomes associated with more invasive lead management strategies for Abbott Riata ® leads: a large, multicenter experience.
المؤلفون: Mar PL; Division of Cardiology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA., Tsai C; Division of Cardiology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA., Golemi L; Division of Cardiology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA., Bedi R; Division of Cardiology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA., Khan A; Division of Cardiology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA., Kabra R; Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories, Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, 5100 W 110Th St., Ste 200, Overland Park, KS, 66211, USA., Atkins D; Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories, Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, 5100 W 110Th St., Ste 200, Overland Park, KS, 66211, USA., Bhakta D; Division of Cardiology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA., Lakkireddy D; Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories, Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, 5100 W 110Th St., Ste 200, Overland Park, KS, 66211, USA., Gopinathannair R; Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratories, Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, 5100 W 110Th St., Ste 200, Overland Park, KS, 66211, USA. drrakeshg@yahoo.com.
المصدر: Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing [J Interv Card Electrophysiol] 2024 Aug; Vol. 67 (5), pp. 1127-1132. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 26.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Comparative Study
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 9708966 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1572-8595 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1383875X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Amsterdam : Springer
Original Publication: Norwell, MA : Kluwer Academic Publishers, c1997-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Device Removal* , Electrodes, Implanted* , Defibrillators, Implantable* , Equipment Failure*, Humans ; Male ; Female ; Retrospective Studies ; Aged ; United States ; Treatment Outcome ; Middle Aged ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Survival Rate
مستخلص: Background: Over 100,000 Abbott Riata ® were implanted in the United States before they were recalled in 2010. There are still a significant number of Abbott Riata ® leads in use, and it is unclear how these leads should be managed at the time of generator change or lead malfunction. Although data comparing both Sprint Fidelis ® and Abbott Riata ® leads in this setting is available, there are no multicenter comparative studies of outcomes for various lead management strategies, including lead extraction (LE), lead abandonment/revision (LA), and generator change (GC) only at the time of device at elective replacement interval (ERI) for Abbott Riata ® leads.
Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study was undertaken to compare short-term outcomes (major complications-MC, death, extended or re-hospitalizations within 60 days-RH, lead malfunction-LM) and total outcomes (short-term outcomes & lead malfunction during follow-up) of patients with Riata ® leads undergoing LE, LA, or GC.
Results: 152 patients (65 ± 13 years, 68% male) were followed for a mean 33 ± 30 months following intervention. Out of 166 procedures, 13 patients underwent LE, 16 patients underwent LA, and 137 patients underwent GC. There was 1 major complication in each group, yielding an event rate of 7.7% for LE, 6.3% for LA, and 0.7% for GC cohorts. There were significantly more short-term and total adverse outcomes in the group of patients getting LE and LA versus GC only (38.5% & 31.3% vs 7.3%, P < 0.001). Total Riata ® lead dwell time follow-up was 17,067 months. A total of 3 Riata ® lead malfunctions were noted during long-term follow-up. Inappropriate shocks were similar between LE 7.7% (1/13), LA 6.3% (1/16). and GC 11.0% (4/136); P = 0.57.
Conclusions: There were more short-term and total adverse outcomes in more invasive management strategies (LE and LA) versus GC alone. The failure rate of Riata ® leads was substantially lower compared to previous reports. Therefore, we recommend only performing battery exchange when a device with an active Riata ® lead is at ERI, unless there is malfunction of the Riata ® lead noted on testing.
(© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
References: Chester, KM. Important Product Information - St. Jude Medical Riata and Riata ST Silicone Endocardial Leads. Dec 15, 2010. Riata Lead Communications. https://www.cardiovascular.abbott/content/dam/bss/divisionalsites/cv/pdf/riata/Important&#95;Product&#95;Information&#95;Riata&#95;Silicone&#95;Leads.PDF . Accessed 1 July 2023.
Hauser RG, McGriff D, Retel LK. Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure: analysis of explanted leads with a unique insulation defect. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:742–9. (PMID: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.01922209723)
Swerdlow CD, Kalahasty G, Ellenbogen KA. Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator Lead Failure and Management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1358–68. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.06726988958)
Mar PL, John A, Kumar S, Barry N, Chen G, Longserre S, Kabra R, Atkins D, Koerber S, Hussein A, et al. Management and long-term outcomes associated with recalled implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: A multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17:1909–16. (PMID: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.06.00432512178)
Zeitler EP, Wang Y, Pokorney SD, Curtis J, Prutkin JM. Comparative outcomes of Riata and Fidelis lead management strategies: Results from the NCDR-ICD Registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44:1897–906. (PMID: 10.1111/pace.1436134520564)
Poole JE, Gleva MJ, Mela T, Chung MK, Uslan DZ, Borge R, Gottipaty V, Shinn T, Dan D, Feldman LA, et al. Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: results from the REPLACE registry. Circulation. 2010;122:1553–61. (PMID: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.97607620921437)
Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Wilkoff BL, Berul CI, Birgersdotter-Green UM, Carrillo R, Cha YM, Clancy J, Deharo JC, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e503–51. (PMID: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.00128919379)
Abdelhadi RH, Saba SF, Ellis CR, Mason PK, Kramer DB, Friedman PA, Gura MT, DiMarco JP, Mugglin AS, Reynolds MR, et al. Independent multicenter study of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:361–5. (PMID: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.10.04523128017)
Gwag HB, Hwang JK, Park KM, Park SJ, On YK, Kim JS. The Incidence of Riata Defibrillator Lead Failure: a Single-Center Experience. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32:1610–5. (PMID: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1610288756045592174)
Ströker E, de Asmundis C, Vanduynhoven P, De Vadder K, De Vusser P, Mullens W, Chierchia GB, Brugada P, Czapla J, La Meir M, et al. Long-Term Performance of the Riata/ST Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:807–12. (PMID: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.01326762730)
Zeitler EP, Pokorney SD, Zhou K, Lewis RK, Greenfield RA, Daubert JP, Matchar DB, Piccini JP. Cable externalization and electrical failure of the Riata family of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1233–40. (PMID: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.00525998139)
Maytin M, Wilkoff BL, Brunner M, Cronin E, Love CJ, Grazia Bongiorni M, Segreti L, Carrillo RG, Garisto JD, Kutalek S, et al. Multicenter experience with extraction of the Riata/Riata ST ICD lead. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:1613–8. (PMID: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.05.01424854215)
Gillis AM. Single or dual coil defibrillation leads? Let’s keep it simple! J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:1253–4. (PMID: 10.1111/jce.1222924015769)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Inappropriate shocks; Lead extraction; Lead malfunction; Lead management; Recalled leads; Riata®
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231026 Date Completed: 20240730 Latest Revision: 20240730
رمز التحديث: 20240730
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01673-y
PMID: 37882994
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-023-01673-y