دورية أكاديمية

Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment and Minimally Invasive Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatoduodenectomy: an ACS NSQIP Analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment and Minimally Invasive Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatoduodenectomy: an ACS NSQIP Analysis.
المؤلفون: Al Abbas AI; University of Texas Southwestern, Department of Surgery, Dallas, TX, USA., Meier J; University of Texas Southwestern, Department of Surgery, Dallas, TX, USA., Hester CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Department of Surgery, Dallas, TX, USA., Radi I; University of Texas Southwestern, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA., Yan J; University of Texas Southwestern, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA., Zhu H; University of Texas Southwestern, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA., Mansour JC; University of Texas Southwestern, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA., Porembka MR; University of Texas Southwestern, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA., Wang SC; University of Texas Southwestern, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA., Yopp AC; University of Texas Southwestern, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA., Zeh HJ 3rd; University of Texas Southwestern, Department of Surgery, Dallas, TX, USA.; University of Texas Southwestern, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA., Polanco PM; University of Texas Southwestern, Department of Surgery, Dallas, TX, USA. Patricio.polanco@utsouthwestern.edu.; University of Texas Southwestern, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Patricio.polanco@utsouthwestern.edu.; Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Road, 3rd Floor, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. Patricio.polanco@utsouthwestern.edu.
المصدر: Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract [J Gastrointest Surg] 2023 Dec; Vol. 27 (12), pp. 2823-2842. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 30.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Elsevier B.V Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9706084 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-4626 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1091255X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Gastrointest Surg Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2024-: [Amsterdam] : Elsevier B.V.
Original Publication: St. Louis, MO : Quality Medical Pub., c1997-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Pancreatic Neoplasms*/surgery , Laparoscopy*, Humans ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Postoperative Complications/surgery ; Retrospective Studies
مستخلص: Background: There is an increasing use of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for pancreatic cancer (PC) followed by minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). We evaluate the impact of the surgical approach on 30-day outcomes in PC patients who underwent NAT.
Methods: Patients with PC who had NAT followed by MIPD or open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) were identified from a pancreatectomy-targeted dataset (2014-2020) of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Comparisons were made between MIPD and OPD within NAT groups.
Results: A total of 5588 patients were analyzed. Of those, 4907 underwent OPD and 476 underwent MIPD. In addition, 3559 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and 1830 received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. In the chemotherapy-alone group, the MIPD subgroup had lower rates of any complication (38.2% vs. 45.8%, P = 0.005), but there were no differences in mortality (2.1% for MIPD vs 1.9% for OPD, P=0.8) or serious complication (11.8% for MIPD vs 15% for OPD, P=0.1). On multivariable analysis, MIPD was independently predictive of lower rates of any complication (OR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.6-0.93, P = 0.0009), CR-POPF (OR: 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.96, P = 0.04), and shorter LOS (estimate: -1.03, 95% CI -1.73 to -0.32, P = 0.004). In the chemoradiation group, patients undergoing MIPD had higher rates of preoperative diabetes (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in any outcomes between the two approaches in this group.
Conclusion: MIPD is safe and feasible after NAT. Patients having neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone followed by MIPD had lower rates of complications, shorter LOS, and fewer CR-POPFs compared to OPD.
(© 2023. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)
References: Kuhlmann KF, de Castro SM, Wesseling JG, ten Kate FJ, Offerhaus GJ, Busch OR, et al. Surgical treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma; actual survival and prognostic factors in 343 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(4):549-58. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.10.02614962722)
Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817-25. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMoa101192321561347)
Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF, Valle JW, Palmer DH, McDonald AC, et al. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;308(2):147-56. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2012.735222782416)
Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, Hartmann JT, Gellert K, Ridwelski K, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. Jama. 2013;310(14):1473-81. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2013.27920124104372)
Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1691-703. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369)
Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Tomlinson JS, Paruch JL, Fleming JB, Talamonti MS, et al. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):372-7. (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.000000000000037824374509)
Tzeng CW, Tran Cao HS, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, et al. Treatment sequencing for resectable pancreatic cancer: influence of early metastases and surgical complications on multimodality therapy completion and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(1):16-24; discussion -5.
Rhim AD, Mirek ET, Aiello NM, Maitra A, Bailey JM, McAllister F, et al. EMT and dissemination precede pancreatic tumor formation. Cell. 2012;148(1-2):349-61. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.025222654203266542)
Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I, Antal T, Leary R, Fu B, et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467(7319):1114-7. (PMID: 10.1038/nature09515209811023148940)
Artinyan A, Anaya DA, McKenzie S, Ellenhorn JD, Kim J. Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117(10):2044-9. (PMID: 10.1002/cncr.2576321523715)
Cheng TY, Sheth K, White RR, Ueno T, Hung CF, Clary BM, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on operative mortality and morbidity for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(1):66-74. (PMID: 10.1245/ASO.2006.02.00316372154)
Lutfi W, Talamonti MS, Kantor O, Wang CH, Liederbach E, Stocker SJ, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy is associated with a survival advantage in early stage adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Surgery. 2016;160(3):714-24. (PMID: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.02927422328)
Mokdad AA, Minter RM, Zhu H, Augustine MM, Porembka MR, Wang SC, et al. Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Resection Versus Upfront Resection for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(5):515-22. (PMID: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.508127621388)
Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(5):408-10. (PMID: 10.1007/BF006424437915434)
Kendrick ML, Cusati D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):19-23. (PMID: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.24320083750)
Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhankumar MV. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(2):222-30. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.04.00417660068)
Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Palmeri M, Miccoli M, Costa F, Vistoli F, et al. The Learning Curve in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg. 2016;33(4):299-307. (PMID: 10.1159/00044501527215422)
Nassour I, Wang SC, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, Choti MA, Augustine MM, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(11):1784-92. (PMID: 10.1007/s11605-017-3543-6288198865789456)
Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, Al Abbas AI, Boone BA, Moser AJ, et al. 500 Minimally Invasive Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies: One Decade of Optimizing Performance. Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):966-72. (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.000000000000355031851003)
Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ, 3rd. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):554-9; discussion 9-62.
Zureikat AH, Nguyen KT, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Moser AJ. Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection and reconstruction. Arch Surg. 2011;146(3):256-61. (PMID: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.24621079111)
Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y, Gillespie TW, Weber SM, Abbott DE, et al. A Multi-institutional Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2016;264(4):640-9. (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.000000000000186927433907)
Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, Kunzler F, Cipriani F, Alseidi A, et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):1-14. (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.000000000000359031567509)
Peng L, Lin S, Li Y, Xiao W. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017;31(8):3085-97. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-016-5371-227928665)
Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A, Augustine MM, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients. Annals of Surgery. 2018;268(1):151-7. (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.000000000000225928486387)
Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, Babu NS, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Anand Vijai N, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg. 2017;104(11):1443-50. (PMID: 10.1002/bjs.1066228895142)
Poves I, Burdio F, Morato O, Iglesias M, Radosevic A, Ilzarbe L, et al. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Approach for Pancreatoduodenectomy: The PADULAP Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018;268(5):731-9. (PMID: 10.1097/SLA.000000000000289330138162)
van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, Brinkman DJ, van Dieren S, Dijkgraaf MG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4(3):199-207. (PMID: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-430685489)
Wang M, Li D, Chen R, Huang X, Li J, Liu Y, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(6):438-47. (PMID: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-633915091)
Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, et al. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(5):416-22. (PMID: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.1725761143)
Muller PC, Breuer E, Nickel F, Zani S, Jr., Kauffmann E, De Franco L, et al. Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy, a Novel Standard of Care? Benchmark Values for Surgical Outcomes from 16 International Expert Centers. Ann Surg. 2022.
Jin J, Shi Y, Chen M, Qian J, Qin K, Wang Z, et al. Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):954. (PMID: 10.1186/s13063-021-05939-6349615588711152)
Burke EE, Marmor S, Portschy PR, Virnig BA, Cho LC, Tuttle TM, et al. Trends in the use of pre-operative radiation for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the United States. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(6):542-50. (PMID: 10.1111/hpb.12400257269504430786)
Cooper AB, Parmar AD, Riall TS, Hall BL, Katz MHG, Aloia TA, et al. Does the Use of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Increase Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Rates? Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2015;19(1):80-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s11605-014-2620-325091851)
Czosnyka NM, Borgert AJ, Smith TJ. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: effects of neoadjuvant therapy on post-pancreatectomy outcomes - an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted variable review. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(10):927-32. (PMID: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.07.00128747265)
Badiyan SN, Molitoris JK, Chuong MD, Regine WF, Kaiser A. The Role of Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer in the Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Settings. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2017;26(3):431-53. (PMID: 10.1016/j.soc.2017.01.01228576181)
Sohal DPS, Duong M, Ahmad SA, Gandhi NS, Beg MS, Wang-Gillam A, et al. Efficacy of Perioperative Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology. 2021;7(3):421-7. (PMID: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.732833475684)
Nassour I, Tohme S, Hoehn R, Adam MA, Zureikat AH, Alessandro P. Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(5):2248-54. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-020-07638-w32440928)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Neoadjuvant therapy; Operative approach; Pancreatoduodenectomy
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231031 Date Completed: 20240205 Latest Revision: 20240213
رمز التحديث: 20240213
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05859-7
PMID: 37903972
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1873-4626
DOI:10.1007/s11605-023-05859-7