دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

A comparison of maxillary posterior changes following facemask therapy: Skeletal anchorage versus tooth-borne anchorage.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: A comparison of maxillary posterior changes following facemask therapy: Skeletal anchorage versus tooth-borne anchorage.
المؤلفون: Lee HJ; Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, South Korea., Jeong H; Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, South Korea., Park JH; Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Arizona School of Dentistry & Oral Health, A.T. Still University, Mesa, Arizona, USA.; Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea., Choi DS; Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, South Korea., Jang I; Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, South Korea., Cha BK; Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, South Korea.
المصدر: Orthodontics & craniofacial research [Orthod Craniofac Res] 2024 Apr; Vol. 27 (2), pp. 303-312. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 13.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101144387 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1601-6343 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 16016335 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Orthod Craniofac Res Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Munksgaard, c2002-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Malocclusion, Angle Class III*/therapy, Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Maxilla/diagnostic imaging ; Maxilla/surgery ; Masks ; Palatal Expansion Technique ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Cephalometry/methods
مستخلص: Objective: To compare changes in the maxillary posterior structure as seen in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images resulting from facemask therapy using skeletal (miniplate/FM) anchorage versus tooth-borne anchorage (RME/FM).
Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 20 patients divided into the miniplate/FM group (nine patients aged 9.5 ± 1.4 years) and the RME/FM group (11 patients aged 9.2 ± 1.4 years). CBCT images before and after facemask therapy were evaluated to assess changes in the maxillary posterior structure.
Results: The miniplate/FM group had greater advancement of the maxilla and midface compared to the RME/FM group (p < .05). Specifically, there was about three times more advancement of the pterygomaxillary suture in the miniplate/FM group than in the RME/FM group (p < .05). Moreover, the advancement of the pterygomaxillary suture was about half the advancement of A point in the miniplate/FM group, while only about 25% in the RME/FM group. Finally, the miniplate/FM group showed an increase in the transverse dimension of the posterior and superior parts of the maxilla (p < .05).
Conclusion: There was greater forward movement of the pterygomaxillary suture with facemask therapy using the skeletal anchorage compared to tooth-borne anchorage, leading to a more significant advancement of the maxilla and midface.
(© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
References: Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:583-592.
Ngan P, Hägg U, Yiu C, Merwin D, Wei SH. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:38-49.
Nartallo-Turley PE, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:217-224.
Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Skeletal effects of early treatment of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:333-343.
Wisth PJ, Tritrapunt A, Rygh P, Boe OE, Norderval K. The effect of maxillary protraction on front occlusion and facial morphology. Acta Odontol Scand. 1987;45:227-237.
Ishii H, Morita S, Takeuchi Y, Nakamura S. Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal class III cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:304-312.
Ngan P, Yiu C, Hu A, Hägg U, Wei SH, Gunel E. Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:237-254.
Kim JH, Viana MA, Graber TM, Omerza FF, BeGole EA. The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:675-685.
Cha BK, Lee NK, Choi DS. Maxillary protraction treatment of skeletal class III children using miniplate anchorage. Korean J Orthod. 2007;37:73-84.
Cha BK, Choi DS, Jang I, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Ngan P. Maxillary protraction using miniplates as skeletal anchorage. Hong Kong Dent J. 2010;7:87-93.
Cha BK, Choi DS, Ngan PW, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Kim SM. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing class III patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:99-112.
Cha BK, Park JH, Choi DS, Jang I. Face mask therapy with skeletal anchorage: a possible alternative to orthognathic surgery. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24:13-20.
Cha BK, Ngan PW. Skeletal anchorage for orthopedic correction of growing class III patients. Semin Orthod. 2011;17:124-137.
Kircelli BH, Pektaş Z, Uçkan S. Orthopedic protraction with skeletal anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and hypodontia. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:156-163.
Kircelli BH, Pektas ZÖ. Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:440-449.
Koh SD, Chung DH. Comparison of skeletal anchored facemask and tooth-borne facemask according to vertical skeletal pattern and growth stage. Angle Orthod. 2014;84:628-633.
Jang JW, Lee MH, Chung DH, et al. Long-term effects of lateral nasal wall anchored facemasks compared with tooth-borne facemasks. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023;164:584-592.
De Clerck H, Cornelis M, Cevidanes L, Heymann G, Tulloch CJ. Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2123-2129.
Cevidanes L, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, De Clerck H. Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:799-806.
Lee HJ, Choi DS, Jang I, Cha BK. Comparison of facemask therapy effects using skeletal and tooth-borne anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2022;92:307-314.
Moon W. Class III treatment by combining facemask (FM) and maxillary skeletal expander (MSE). Semin Orthod. 2018;24:95-107.
Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Cornelis MA, Heymann G, de Paula LK, De Clerck H. Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:790-798.
Kambara T. Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca irus. Am J Orthod. 1977;71:249-277.
Jackson GW, Kokich VG, Shapiro PA. Experimental and postexperimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemestrina. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:318-333.
Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140282.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:119-129.
Merwin D, Ngan P, Hägg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:292-299.
Canut JA, Raga C. Morphological analysis of cases with ectopic eruption of the maxillary first permanent molar. Eur J Orthod. 1983;5:249-253.
Lee SC, Park JH, Bayome M, Kim KB, Araujo EA, Kook YA. Effect of bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders with and without surgical assistance on the craniofacial structures using finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145:638-648.
Cho AR, Park JH, Moon W, Chae JM, Kang KH. Short-term effects of microimplant assisted rapid palatal expansion on the circummaxillary sutures in skeletally mature patients: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161:e187-e197.
Hass AJ. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:219-255.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Class III malocclusion; cone-beam computed tomography; facemask; pterygomaxillary suture; skeletal anchorage
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231113 Date Completed: 20240306 Latest Revision: 20240306
رمز التحديث: 20240306
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12731
PMID: 37955169
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1601-6343
DOI:10.1111/ocr.12731