دورية أكاديمية

Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Efficacy of 3D screens for sustainable mosquito control: a semi-field experimental hut evaluation in northeastern Tanzania.
المؤلفون: Kathet S; Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Haartman Institute, and Translational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland., Sudi W; Amani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical Research, Muheza, Tanzania., Mwingira V; Amani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical Research, Muheza, Tanzania., Tungu P; Amani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical Research, Muheza, Tanzania., Aalto M; East Africa University, Bosaso, Somalia., Hakala T; Department of Materials Science, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 589, 33101, Tampere, Finland., Honkala M; Department of Materials Science, Tampere University of Technology, P.O. Box 589, 33101, Tampere, Finland., Malima R; Amani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical Research, Muheza, Tanzania., Kisinza W; Amani Medical Research Centre, National Institute for Medical Research, Muheza, Tanzania., Meri S; Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Haartman Institute, and Translational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.; HUSLAB Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, N00029, Helsinki, Finland., Khattab A; Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Haartman Institute, and Translational Immunology Research Program, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. ayman.khattab@helsinki.fi.; Department of Nucleic Acid Research, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, New Borg El-Arab City, 21934, Alexandria, Egypt. ayman.khattab@helsinki.fi.
المصدر: Parasites & vectors [Parasit Vectors] 2023 Nov 15; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 417. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 15.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101462774 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1756-3305 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17563305 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Parasit Vectors Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : BioMed Central
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Anopheles* , Malaria*/prevention & control , Insecticides*, Female ; Animals ; Mosquito Control/methods ; Mosquito Vectors ; Tanzania
مستخلص: Background: A three-dimensional window screen (3D-Screen) has been developed to create a window double-screen trap (3D-WDST), effectively capturing and preventing the escape of mosquitoes. A 2015 laboratory study demonstrated the 3D-Screen's efficacy, capturing 92% of mosquitoes in a double-screen setup during wind tunnel assays. To further evaluate its effectiveness, phase II experimental hut trials were conducted in Muheza, Tanzania.
Methods: Three experimental hut trials were carried out between 2016 and 2017. Trial I tested two versions of the 3D-WDST in huts with open or closed eaves, with one version using a single 3D-Screen and the other using two 3D-Screens. Trial II examined the 3D-WDST with two 3D-Screens in huts with or without baffles, while Trial III compared handmade and machine-made 3D structures. Mosquito capturing efficacy of the 3D-WDST was measured by comparing the number of mosquitoes collected in the test hut to a control hut with standard exit traps.
Results: Trial I showed that the 3D-WDST with two 3D-Screens used in huts with open eaves achieved the highest mosquito-capturing efficacy. This treatment captured 33.11% (CI 7.40-58.81) of female anophelines relative to the total collected in this hut (3D-WDST and room collections) and 27.27% (CI 4.23-50.31) of female anophelines relative to the total collected in the control hut (exit traps, room, and verandahs collections). In Trial II, the two 3D-Screens version of the 3D-WDST captured 70.32% (CI 56.87-83.77) and 51.07% (CI 21.72-80.41) of female anophelines in huts with and without baffles, respectively. Compared to the control hut, the capturing efficacy for female anophelines was 138.6% (37.23-239.9) and 42.41% (14.77-70.05) for huts with and without baffles, respectively. Trial III demonstrated similar performance between hand- and machine-made 3D structures.
Conclusions: The 3D-WDST proved effective in capturing malaria vectors under semi-field experimental hut conditions. Using 3D-Screens on both sides of the window openings was more effective than using a single-sided 3D-Screen. Additionally, both hand- and machine-made 3D structures exhibited equally effective performance, supporting the production of durable cones on an industrial scale for future large-scale studies evaluating the 3D-WDST at the community level.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
References: Med Vet Entomol. 1995 Jul;9(3):316-24. (PMID: 7548951)
Bull Entomol Res. 1969 Jul;59(1):33-46. (PMID: 4390166)
Malar J. 2015 Mar 06;14:104. (PMID: 25885457)
PLoS Biol. 2016 Mar 02;14(3):e1002380. (PMID: 26934361)
J Med Entomol. 1997 May;34(3):285-9. (PMID: 9151491)
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Sep;9(9):e1325-e1331. (PMID: 34216565)
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Apr 04;5:69. (PMID: 22475528)
Malar J. 2015 Jun 09;14:209. (PMID: 26055986)
Malar J. 2018 Oct 22;17(1):375. (PMID: 30348167)
Med Vet Entomol. 2015 Dec;29(4):371-9. (PMID: 26194052)
Malar J. 2008 Aug 25;7:163. (PMID: 18724871)
Malar J. 2013 Jun 10;12:196. (PMID: 23758904)
JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):597. (PMID: 35133414)
Bull Entomol Res. 1965 Oct;56(1):161-7. (PMID: 5831207)
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80626. (PMID: 24236191)
Bull Entomol Res. 1969 Dec;59(3):457-63. (PMID: 5375525)
Malar J. 2020 Feb 13;19(1):70. (PMID: 32054502)
Malar J. 2013 Mar 16;12:99. (PMID: 23497325)
Malar J. 2013 Sep 12;12:319. (PMID: 24028542)
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004 Jul;34(7):599-605. (PMID: 15242700)
Lancet. 2009 Sep 19;374(9694):954-955. (PMID: 19732948)
Malar J. 2021 Jan 1;20(1):2. (PMID: 33386073)
Trop Med Int Health. 2002 Feb;7(2):149-58. (PMID: 11841705)
Malar J. 2013 Jun 13;12:203. (PMID: 23764006)
Lancet Planet Health. 2017 Aug;1(5):e188-e199. (PMID: 29851640)
Afr J Health Sci. 2001 Jan-Jun;8(1-2):17-23. (PMID: 17650043)
Trop Med Int Health. 2003 Jun;8(6):512-7. (PMID: 12791056)
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2001 Jun;95(4):325-30. (PMID: 11454241)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 May;23(5):782-789. (PMID: 28418299)
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1996 Oct;90(5):515-21. (PMID: 8915128)
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Aug 29;10(1):400. (PMID: 28851461)
Malar J. 2009 Sep 29;8:221. (PMID: 19785779)
Annu Rev Entomol. 1999;44:131-57. (PMID: 9990718)
Med Vet Entomol. 1996 Jan;10(1):1-11. (PMID: 8834736)
Lancet. 2001 Apr 21;357(9264):1241-7. (PMID: 11418148)
Lancet. 2009 Sep 19;374(9694):998-1009. (PMID: 19732949)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990 Aug;43(2):107-15. (PMID: 2202220)
Parassitologia. 1999 Sep;41(1-3):209-17. (PMID: 10697859)
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993 Oct;61(2):315-20. (PMID: 8264734)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: 3D-Screens; 3D-WDST; Anopheles; Experimental huts; Malaria; Mosquito control; Muheza; Northeastern Tanzania; Window double screens
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Insecticides)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231115 Date Completed: 20240214 Latest Revision: 20240214
رمز التحديث: 20240214
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10647037
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-023-06032-4
PMID: 37964334
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1756-3305
DOI:10.1186/s13071-023-06032-4