دورية أكاديمية

Investigation of the reasons for patients who choose peritoneal dialysis as kidney replacement therapies to change their decisions.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Investigation of the reasons for patients who choose peritoneal dialysis as kidney replacement therapies to change their decisions.
المؤلفون: Altunok M; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey., Çankaya E; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey., Sevinç C; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey., Uyanık A; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
المصدر: Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy [Ther Apher Dial] 2024 Apr; Vol. 28 (2), pp. 246-254. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 20.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Blackwell Pub Country of Publication: Australia NLM ID: 101181252 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1744-9987 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17449979 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ther Apher Dial Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Carlton South, Vic., Australia : Blackwell Pub., c2003-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Kidney Failure, Chronic*/therapy , Peritoneal Dialysis*, Humans ; Renal Dialysis ; Renal Replacement Therapy ; Surveys and Questionnaires
مستخلص: Introduction: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is one of the kidney replacement therapies (KRT). Patients' choice of KRT is influenced by personal causes, familial factors, factors related to healthcare professionals, and social factors.
Methods: This study included 341 patients. PD patients who changed their KRT selection were asked for the reasons to change with a questionnaire.
Results: Of the patients who initially chose PD, only 48.5% received KRT by PD. Five (20%) of the patients gave up PD compulsorily because they heard that the risk of infection with PD was higher, eight (40%) thought they could not do it, four (20%) because they needed to do assisted PD but had no relatives to do it, and three (15%) because they had abdominal surgery.
Conclusion: We believe that the fact that KRT training is carried out by a PD trained team and that patients are provided with assistance for PD will be effective in addressing the concerns of patients with PD undecided.
(© 2023 International Society for Apheresis and Japanese Society for Apheresis.)
References: Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709-733.
Cockwell P, Fisher LA. The global burden of chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):662-664.
Chapter 1: definition and classification of CKD. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(1):19-62. https://doi.org/10.1038/kisup.2012.64.
Neph Dial T, Esen B, Sağlam Gökmen E, Engin Atay A, Sarı H, Karakoç A, et al. Original investigation evaluation of the frequency and related factors of depression and anxiety in patients with end stage kidney disease receiving kidney replacement therapies. Transplantation. 2015;24(3):270-277.
Glassock RJ, Warnock DG, Delanaye P. The global burden of chronic kidney disease: estimates, variability and pitfalls. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2016;13(2):104-114.
Shi Y, Li W, Duan F, Pu S, Peng H, Ha M, et al. Factors promoting shared decision-making in kidney replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(3):553-574.
Vélez-Bermúdez M, Christensen AJ, Kinner EM, Roche AI, Fraer M. Exploring the relationship between patient activation, treatment satisfaction, and decisional conflict in patients approaching end-stage kidney disease. Ann Behav Med. 2019;53(9):816-826.
O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 2016;15(1):25-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9501500105.
Stephens RL, Xu Y, Volk RJ, Scholl LE, Kamin SL, Holden EW, et al. Influence of a patient decision aid on decisional conflict related to PSA testing: a structural equation model. Health Psychol. 2008;27(6):711-721.
Cankaya E, Cetinkaya R, Keles M, Gulcan E, Uyanik A, Kisaoglu A, et al. Does a predialysis education program increase the number of pre-emptive kidney transplantations? Transplant Proc. 2013;45(3):887-889.
Lv JC, Zhang LX. Prevalence and disease burden of chronic kidney disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1165:3-15.
Ho YF, Chen YC, Huang CC, Hu WY, Lin KC, Li IC. The effects of shared decision making on different kidney replacement therapy decisions in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Nurs Res. 2020;28(4):e109.
Kramer A, Boenink R, Noordzij M, Bosdriesz JR, Stel VS, Beltrán P, et al. The ERA-EDTA registry annual report 2017: a summary. Clin Kidney J. 2020;13(4):693-709.
Carrero JJ, Hecking M, Chesnaye NC, Jager KJ. Sex and gender disparities in the epidemiology and outcomes of chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(3):151-164.
Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LYC, Albertus P, Ayanian J, et al. US kidney data system 2016 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;69(3 Suppl 1):A7-A8.
Chandna SM, Carpenter L, da Silva-Gane M, Warwicker P, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. Rate of decline of kidney function, modality choice, and survival in elderly patients with advanced kidney disease. Nephron. 2016;134(2):64-72.
Lentine KL, Smith JM, Hart A, Miller J, Skeans MA, Larkin L, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2020 annual data report: kidney. Am J Transplant. 2022;22(S2):21-136.
Seyahi N, Koçyiğit İ, Ateş K, Süleymanlar G. Current status of kidney replacement therapy in Turkey: a summary of 2020 Turkish Society of Nephrology Registry report. Turk J Nephrol. 2022;31(2):103-109.
Seah AST, Tan F, Srinivas S, Wu HY, Griva K. Opting out of dialysis-exploring patients' decisions to forego dialysis in favour of conservative non-dialytic management for end-stage kidney disease. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1018-1029.
Erlang AS, Nielsen IH, Hansen HOB, Finderup J. Patients experiences of involvement in choice of dialysis mode. J Ren Care. 2015;41(4):260-267.
Gordon EJ. Patients' decisions for treatment of end-stage kidney disease and their implications for access to transplantation. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(8):971-987.
van den Bosch J, Simone Warren D, Rutherford PA. Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1279-1291.
Dahlerus C, Quinn M, Messersmith E, Lachance L, Subramanian L, Perry E, et al. Patient perspectives on the choice of dialysis modality: results from the empowering patients on choices for kidney replacement therapy (EPOCH-KRT) study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(6):901-910.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: hemodialysis; kidney replacement therapy; peritoneal dialysis; transplantation
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231120 Date Completed: 20240305 Latest Revision: 20240305
رمز التحديث: 20240305
DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.14088
PMID: 37985242
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1744-9987
DOI:10.1111/1744-9987.14088