دورية أكاديمية
Development and initial evaluation of a treatment integrity measure for low-intensity group psychoeducational interventions.
| العنوان: | Development and initial evaluation of a treatment integrity measure for low-intensity group psychoeducational interventions. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Gosling J; Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK., Simmonds-Buckley M; Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.; Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, UK., Kellett S; Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.; Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, UK., Duffy D; Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK., Olenkiewicz-Martyniszyn K; Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, UK. |
| المصدر: | Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy [Behav Cogn Psychother] 2024 May; Vol. 52 (3), pp. 317-330. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 28. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Cambridge University Press Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9418292 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1469-1833 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13524658 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Behav Cogn Psychother Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: New York, NY : Cambridge University Press Original Publication: London : Wisepress Ltd., 1993- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Reproducibility of Results*, Humans ; Psychometrics |
| مستخلص: | Background: Despite the importance of assessing the quality with which low-intensity (LI) group psychoeducational interventions are delivered, no measure of treatment integrity (TI) has been developed. Aims: To develop a psychometrically robust TI measure for LI psychoeducational group interventions. Method: This study had two phases. Firstly, the group psychoeducation treatment integrity measure-expert rater (GPTIM-ER) and a detailed scoring manual were developed. This was piloted by n =5 expert raters rating the same LI group session; n =6 expert raters then assessed content validity. Secondly, 10 group psychoeducational sessions drawn from routine practice were then rated by n =8 expert raters using the GPTIM-ER; n =9 patients also rated the quality of the group sessions using a sister version (i.e. GPTIM-P) and clinical and service outcome data were drawn from the LI groups assessed. Results: The GPTIM-ER had excellent internal reliability, good test-retest reliability, but poor inter-rater reliability. The GPTIM-ER had excellent content validity, construct validity, formed a single factor scale and had reasonable predictive validity. Conclusions: The GPTIM-ER has promising, but not complete, psychometric properties. The low inter-rater reliability scores between expert raters are the main ongoing concern and so further development and testing is required in future well-constructed studies. |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Adherence; Competence; Group therapy; Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Programme (IAPT); Psychoeducation |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20231128 Date Completed: 20240405 Latest Revision: 20240405 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240405 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S1352465823000528 |
| PMID: | 38014558 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1469-1833 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1017/S1352465823000528 |