دورية أكاديمية
Effect of Different Desensitizer Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Metal Brackets Following In-Office Bleaching: An In Vitro Study.
| العنوان: | Effect of Different Desensitizer Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Metal Brackets Following In-Office Bleaching: An In Vitro Study. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Ambersari SE; Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia., Karunia D; Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia., Alhasyimi AA; Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. |
| المصدر: | European journal of dentistry [Eur J Dent] 2024 Jul; Vol. 18 (3), pp. 820-826. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 04. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Thieme Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 101303672 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1305-7456 (Print) NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur J Dent Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: [2019]- : [Stuttgart] : Thieme Original Publication: Ankara : Dental Investigations Society |
| مستخلص: | Objective: One of the adverse effects of in-office bleaching is tooth hypersensitivity, which could be neutralized with a desensitizing agent. In-office bleaching and the application of desensitizing agents will affect the morphology of the enamel surface. These morphological changes have potential effects on the shear bond strength (SBS) and bonding of orthodontic brackets. This study analyzed the effects of fluoride and nonfluoride desensitizing agents after in-office bleaching on the SBS of metal brackets with resin composite cementation. Materials and Methods: Twenty-seven postextraction premolars ( n = 27) were bleached with 37% hydrogen peroxide and then divided into three groups: control group (group 1), fluoride-based desensitizing agent (group 2), and nonfluoride-based desensitizing agent (group 3). After treatment, the brackets were bonded using Transbond, and then the SBS test was performed using a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was analyzed after the SBS test, whereas enamel morphological changes were observed under a scanning electron microscope. After this assessment, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was conducted to determine calcium and phosphorus elements in the enamel surface after treatments. SBS data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey test, whereas ARI scores were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney test with a significance level of 5%. Results: The SBS increased significantly in group 2 compared with groups 1 and 3 ( p < 0.05). In group 2, an ARI of 2 (55.56%) was frequent, whereas in group 3, an ARI of 3 (55.56%) appeared most frequently. Conclusion: The application of the desensitizing agent fluoride after in-office bleaching increased the SBS and more adhesive remains on the tooth surface compared with that when nonfluoride desensitizing agents were applied on metal brackets with composite resin cementation. Competing Interests: None declared. (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).) |
| References: | Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 23;11(1):13177. (PMID: 34162984) Am J Dent. 2004 Oct;17(5):368-72. (PMID: 15575450) Oper Dent. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):518-25. (PMID: 22433029) Eur J Dent. 2023 Jul;17(3):649-662. (PMID: 36075265) Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):686-90. (PMID: 23210544) J Conserv Dent. 2012 Oct;15(4):351-6. (PMID: 23112483) Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):67-73. (PMID: 28125142) Eur J Dent. 2020 Feb;14(1):13-18. (PMID: 31955402) J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Feb 01;11(2):e126-e132. (PMID: 30805116) Angle Orthod. 2008 Jan;78(1):129-33. (PMID: 18193975) Eur J Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):351-355. (PMID: 27403052) Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 Sep-Oct;25(5):38-43. (PMID: 33206827) Eur J Dent. 2024 May;18(2):619-623. (PMID: 36716785) J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Mar;33(2):371-379. (PMID: 32598098) J Oral Rehabil. 1974 Jul;1(3):265-84. (PMID: 4610102) Eur J Dent. 2021 Jul;15(3):515-522. (PMID: 33622008) J Dent. 2007 Apr;35(4):325-30. (PMID: 17116354) J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 Nov 08;27:e20180233. (PMID: 30427477) Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Feb 14;20:28. (PMID: 36960020) Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):405-411. (PMID: 24932113) Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Sep;16(3):181-6. (PMID: 26418918) Angle Orthod. 2009 Jul;79(4):777-83. (PMID: 19537855) Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):49-54. (PMID: 25992987) Arch Oral Biol. 2007 Jul;52(7):632-9. (PMID: 17306757) Int Orthod. 2020 Jun;18(2):214-224. (PMID: 32241631) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20231204 Latest Revision: 20240802 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240802 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC11290921 |
| DOI: | 10.1055/s-0043-1776119 |
| PMID: | 38049118 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
| تدمد: | 1305-7456 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1055/s-0043-1776119 |