دورية أكاديمية
Trends in Head and Neck Injuries Related to Electric Versus Pedal Bicycle Use in the United States.
| العنوان: | Trends in Head and Neck Injuries Related to Electric Versus Pedal Bicycle Use in the United States. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Williams LC; Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A., Kafle S; Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A., Lee YH; Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A. |
| المصدر: | The Laryngoscope [Laryngoscope] 2024 Jun; Vol. 134 (6), pp. 2734-2740. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 05. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article; Comparative Study |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8607378 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1531-4995 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0023852X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Laryngoscope Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: <2009- >: Philadelphia, PA : Wiley-Blackwell Original Publication: St. Louis, Mo. : [s.n., 1896- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Bicycling*/injuries , Bicycling*/statistics & numerical data , Neck Injuries*/epidemiology , Neck Injuries*/etiology , Craniocerebral Trauma*/epidemiology , Craniocerebral Trauma*/etiology , Head Protective Devices*/statistics & numerical data, Humans ; United States/epidemiology ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Adolescent ; Young Adult ; Incidence ; Child ; Aged ; Child, Preschool |
| مستخلص: | Objectives: To describe the incidence of head and neck trauma related to electric bicycles and to characterize head and neck injury patterns seen in electric bicycle (eBike) users versus pedal bicyclists in the United States. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was queried from 2009 to 2020 for patients with head and neck injuries related to electric and pedal bicycles. Extracted data included patient demographics, injury patterns, hospital admission, and helmet use. Univariate chi-squared analyses were performed to compare demographics and injury patterns between bicycle groups. Effect sizes were reported with Cramer V values (V). Results: The incidence of eBike-related head and neck injuries increased from 2993 in 2009 to 9916 in 2020. Compared to pedal bicycle users, eBike users were more likely to have head injuries (60.4% vs. 52.0%) and fractures (10.9% vs. 6.0%), and were more likely to require hospitalization (20.6% vs. 10.4%). The effect size of helmet use was significantly greater in eBike users compared to pedal bicyclists when examining distributions of age group (V = 0.203 vs. V = 0.079), injury location (V = 0.220 vs. V = 0.082), and injury type (V = 0.162 vs. V = 0.059). Helmeted injuries in eBike users more commonly involved neck injuries and sprains, rather than head injuries and fractures. Conclusion: Head and neck trauma related to eBike use is increasing in the United States. Injury patterns and admission rates reflect greater injury severity in eBike users compared to pedal bicyclists. Helmet use may be particularly beneficial in mitigating head and neck injury in eBike users. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:2734-2740, 2024. (© 2023 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.) |
| References: | Sorenson D. The cycling market pedals ahead in 2021. NPD Insights. Vol 2022. The NPD Group; 2021. Design ATFoG. AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. nacto.org2012. Gitelman V, Korchatov A, Elias W. Speeds of young E‐cyclists on urban streets and related risk factors: an observational study in Israel. Safety. 2020;6(2):29. Boffano P, Roccia F, Gallesio C, Karagozoglu KH, Forouzanfar T. Bicycle‐related maxillofacial injuries: a double‐center study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(3):275‐280. Schneider D, Kämmerer PW, Schön G, Dinu C, Radloff S, Bschorer R. Etiology and injury patterns of maxillofacial fractures from the years 2010 to 2013 in Mecklenburg‐Western Pomerania, Germany: a retrospective study of 409 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(10):1948‐1951. Boffano P, Kommers SC, Karagozoglu KH, Forouzanfar T. Aetiology of maxillofacial fractures: a review of published studies during the last 30 years. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52(10):901‐906. Zhou HH, Liu Q, Yang RT, Li Z, Li ZB. Maxillofacial fractures in women and men: a 10‐year retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(11):2181‐2188. Smith H, Peek‐Asa C, Nesheim D, Nish A, Normandin P, Sahr S. Etiology, diagnosis, and characteristics of facial fracture at a midwestern level I trauma center. J Trauma Nurs. 2012;19(1):57‐65. Vetter JD, Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Smith DG. Facial fractures occurring in a medium‐sized metropolitan area: recent trends. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;20(4):214‐216. Erdmann D, Follmar KE, Debruijn M, et al. A retrospective analysis of facial fracture etiologies. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(4):398‐403. CDC. Web‐Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) [online]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/. Grill FD, Roth C, Zyskowski M, et al. E‐scooter‐related craniomaxillofacial injuries compared with bicycle‐related injuries – a retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022;50(9):738‐744. Nisson PL, Ley E, Chu R. Electric scooters: case reports indicate a growing public health concern. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(2):177‐179. Aizpuru M, Farley KX, Rojas JC, Crawford RS, Moore TJ Jr, Wagner ER. Motorized scooter injuries in the era of scooter‐shares: a review of the national electronic surveillance system. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(6):1133‐1138. Lin S, Goldman S, Peleg K, Levin L. Dental and maxillofacial injuries associated with electric‐powered bikes and scooters in Israel: a report for 2014‐2019. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(5):533‐537. Arbel S, Zrifin E, Mahmoud R, et al. Maxillofacial injuries sustained by riders of electric‐powered bikes and electric‐powered scooters. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):15183. Verstappen EMJ, Vy DT, Janzing HM, et al. Bicycle‐related injuries in the emergency department: a comparison between E‐bikes and conventional bicycles: a prospective observational study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;47:1853‐1860. Spörri E, Halvachizadeh S, Gamble JG, et al. Comparison of injury patterns between electric bicycle, bicycle and motorcycle accidents. J Clin Med. 2021;10(15):3359. Baschera D, Jäger D, Preda R, et al. Comparison of the incidence and severity of traumatic brain injury caused by electrical bicycle and bicycle accidents – a retrospective cohort study from a Swiss Level I Trauma Center. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:e1023‐e1034. Verbeek AJM, de Valk J, Schakenraad D, Verbeek JFM, Kroon AA. E‐bike and classic bicycle‐related traumatic brain injuries presenting to the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2021;38(4):279‐284. Berk T, Halvachizadeh S, Backup J, et al. Increased injury severity and hospitalization rates following crashes with e‐bikes versus conventional bicycles: an observational cohort study from a regional level II trauma center in Switzerland. Patient Saf Surg. 2022;16(1):11. van der Zaag PD, Rozema R, Poos H, Kleinbergen JYJ, van Minnen B, Reininga IHF. Maxillofacial fractures in electric and conventional bicycle‐related accidents. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;80(8):1361‐1370. NEISS. Coding manual. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Accessed August 12, 2022. https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/2019_NEISS_Coding_Manual.pdf. Papoutsi S, Martinolli L, Braun CT, Exadaktylos AK. E‐bike injuries: experience from an urban emergency department—a retrospective study from Switzerland. Emerg Med Int. 2014;2014:850236. Weber T, Scaramuzza G, Schmitt KU. Evaluation of e‐bike accidents in Switzerland. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;73:47‐52. DiMaggio CJ, Bukur M, Wall SP, Frangos SG, Wen AY. Injuries associated with electric‐powered bikes and scooters: analysis of US consumer product data. Inj Prev. 2020;26(6):524‐528. Wang Z, Huang S, Wang J, Sulaj D, Hao W, Kuang A. Risk factors affecting crash injury severity for different groups of e‐bike riders: a classification tree‐based logistic regression model. J Safety Res. 2021;76:176‐183. de Guerre L, Sadiqi S, Leenen LPH, Oner CF, van Gaalen SM. Injuries related to bicycle accidents: an epidemiological study in The Netherlands. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(2):413‐418. Arshad Z, Majeed M, Thahir A, et al. Cycling‐related trauma admissions to the major trauma centre in the cycling capital of the United Kingdom. Injury. 2022;53(12):3970‐3977. PeopleForBikes Foundation. Electric Bike Laws – State by State. PeopleForBikes Foundation; 2022. Accessed August 12, 2022. https://www.peopleforbikes.org/electric-bikes/state-laws. |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: NEISS; electric bicycle; facial injury; head and neck |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20231206 Date Completed: 20240508 Latest Revision: 20240508 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240508 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/lary.31213 |
| PMID: | 38053413 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1531-4995 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1002/lary.31213 |