دورية أكاديمية
Family medicine physician identification of obstetric lacerations: a US national survey.
| العنوان: | Family medicine physician identification of obstetric lacerations: a US national survey. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Simon NT; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA., Niblock FC; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA., Rabaza CA; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA., Hoss ML; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA., Sheeder JK; Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA., Hurt KJ; Divisions of Maternal Fetal Medicine and Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12700 East 19th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. k.joseph.hurt@cuanschutz.edu. |
| المصدر: | International urogynecology journal [Int Urogynecol J] 2024 Feb; Vol. 35 (2), pp. 391-399. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 11. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101567041 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1433-3023 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09373462 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int Urogynecol J Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: London : Springer |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Lacerations*/etiology , General Practitioners*, Pregnancy ; Female ; Humans ; Family Practice ; Educational Status ; Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects |
| مستخلص: | Introduction and Hypothesis: We evaluated family medicine obstetric providers' identification and categorization of vaginal delivery lacerations in the USA. We hypothesized that there would be inaccuracy in family medicine physicians' identification of vaginal delivery injuries, similar to our previous studies of midwives and obstetricians (OBs). Methods: We included clinically active physicians who attended deliveries within 2 years and evaluated their identification and categorization of delivery lacerations using descriptive text and visual images. We asked about their education on this topic and how they document lacerations in the labor and delivery record. Results: We analyzed 250 completed responses (70% of opened surveys). Fifty-five percent of respondents characterized their obstetric laceration training as "good" or "excellent" and half previously had education on obstetric lacerations. The median accuracy overall for the classification and identification of perineal lacerations was 78% (IQR 56-91%). Respondents frequently mischaracterized nonperineal lacerations. Few respondents (36%) reported using the third-degree injury subclassification system. In adjusted analysis, the highest scoring respondents were board certified in family medicine, with fewer years in practice, and a higher obstetric volume. Conclusions: Obstetric laceration diagnoses may be inaccurate, which could influence perinatal quality and patient outcomes. We found gaps in knowledge similar to previous reports on midwives and obstetricians in the USA. These data suggest a need for increased education and training on obstetric injuries, perhaps especially for physicians with less obstetric activity. Improved categorization and identification of vaginal delivery trauma can impact management and improve women's postpartum care and long-term pelvic floor outcomes. (© 2023. The International Urogynecological Association.) |
| References: | ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198. Prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:e87–102. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002841) Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:59. (PMID: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-59234970853599825) Sultan AH. Editorial: obstetrical perineal injury and anal incontinence. AVMA Med Legal J. 1999;5:193–6. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 210. Fecal incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e260–73. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003187) Gommesen D, Nohr EA, Qvist N, Rasch V. Obstetric perineal ruptures—risk of anal incontinence among primiparous women 12 months postpartum: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(2):165.e1–11. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.02631449804) D'Souza JC, Monga A, Tincello DG, et al. Maternal outcomes in subsequent delivery after previous obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): a multi-centre retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):627–33. (PMID: 10.1007/s00192-019-03983-031230097) Lewicky-Gaupp C, Leader-Cramer A, Johnson LL, Kenton K, Gossett DR. Wound complications after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(5):1088–93. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.000000000000083325932836) Basham E, Stock L, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Mitchell C, Gossett DR. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(6):328–32. (PMID: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a5f98e24165445) Bunn JG, Sheeder J, Schulkin J, Diko S, Estin M, Connell KA, et al. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries and other delivery trauma: a US national survey of obstetrician-gynecologists. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. Diko S, Guiahi M, Nacht A, Connell KA, Reeves S, Bailey BA, et al. Prevention and management of severe obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs): a National Survey of Nurse-Midwives. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):591–604. (PMID: 10.1007/s00192-019-03897-x30877353) Diko S, Sheeder J, Guiahi M, et al. Identification of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) and other lacerations: a national survey of nurse-midwives. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1745–53. (PMID: 10.1007/s00192-020-04304-632399907) Wakefield B, Diko S, Gilmer R, Connell KA, DeWitt PE, Hurt KJ. Accuracy of obstetric laceration diagnoses in the electronic medical record. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1907–15. (PMID: 10.1007/s00192-020-04450-x32789812) Mutema E. “A tale of two cities”: auditing midwifery practice and perineal trauma. Br J Midwifery. 2007;15:511–3. (PMID: 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.8.24394) Roper JC, Thakar R, Hurt KJ, Sultan AH. Diagnosis, management and training in perineal trauma: a UK national survey of obstetricians. Int Urogynecol J. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05590-6 . (PMID: 10.1007/s00192-023-05590-63749843210756863) Roper JC, Hurt KJ, Sultan AH. Diagnosis, management and training in perineal trauma: a national survey of UK midwives. Br J Midwifery. 2023;31(6):316–24. (PMID: 10.12968/bjom.2023.31.6.316) American Academy of Family Physicians. Training Requirements for Family Physicians 2023 [Available from: https://www.aafp.org/students-residents/medical-students/explore-career-in-family-medicine/training-requirements.html . Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine. ACGME-approved major revision, effective 1 July 2023 [Available from: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/120_familymedicine_2023.pdf . National Graduate Survey for year(s): 2022. American Board of Family Medicine partnered with Association of Family Medicine Residency Directors; April 2023. Available from: https://www.theabfm.org/sites/default/files/2022%20National%20Graduate%20Survey%20Report_NationalOnly.pdf. Deutchman M, Macaluso F, Bray E, et al. The impact of family physicians in rural maternity care. Birth. 2022;49(2):220–32. (PMID: 10.1111/birt.1259134558093) Young RA. Maternity care services provided by family physicians in rural hospitals. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017;30(1):71–7. (PMID: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.16007228062819) Walter G, Topmiller M, Jetty A, Jabbarpour Y. Family physicians providing obstetric care in maternity care deserts. Am Fam Physician. 2022;106(4):377–8. (PMID: 36260889) Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Prendergast E, D'Alton ME, Wright JD. Evaluation of third-degree and fourth-degree laceration rates as quality indicators. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):927–37. (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.000000000000072025751203) Patient Safety Indicator 19 (PSI 19) Obstetric trauma rate—vaginal delivery without instrument. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services. July 2020. Pergialiotis V, Vlachos D, Protopapas A, Pappa K, Vlachos G. Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(1):6–14. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.03424529800) Family medicine facts, Table 11: Clinical services performed by physicians American Academy of Family Physicians [Available from: https://www.aafp.org/about/dive-into-family-medicine/family-medicine-facts/table11.html. Jurczuk M, Bidwell P, Gurol-Urganci I, et al. The OASI care bundle quality improvement project: lessons learned and future direction. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(7):1989–95. (PMID: 10.1007/s00192-021-04786-y339887848295109) Basu M, Smith D. Long-term outcomes of the Stop Traumatic OASI Morbidity Project (STOMP). Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;142(3):295–9. (PMID: 10.1002/ijgo.1256529885253) Roper JC, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Under-classified obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(6):1473–9. (PMID: 10.1007/s00192-021-05051-y35150290) Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Fanaki M, Vrachnis N, Doumouchtsis SK. Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth: an updated meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;247:94–100. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.02532087423) Serati M, Salvatore S, Rizk D. Episiotomy in modern clinical practice: friend or foe? Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(5):669–71. (PMID: 10.1007/s00192-019-03912-130868195) American Board of Family Medicine, 2020 National Graduate Survey Report 2020 [Available from: https://www.theabfm.org/research/national-family-medicine-residency-graduate-reports . Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34. (PMID: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34154717601550605) Pit S, Vo T, Pyakurel S. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner’s survey response rates—a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14:76. (PMID: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-76249064924059731) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Continuing medical education; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Perineal trauma; Vaginal delivery; Vaginal delivery lacerations |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20231211 Date Completed: 20240304 Latest Revision: 20240304 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240304 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00192-023-05689-w |
| PMID: | 38078914 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1433-3023 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00192-023-05689-w |