دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

The impact of human cadaveric dissection on professional identity formation in medical students.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The impact of human cadaveric dissection on professional identity formation in medical students.
المؤلفون: Ong CX; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore. ong.ci.xin@u.duke.nus.edu., Foo YY; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore., Compton S; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
المصدر: BMC medical education [BMC Med Educ] 2023 Dec 19; Vol. 23 (1), pp. 970. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Dec 19.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088679 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6920 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726920 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Med Educ Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Students, Medical* , Education, Medical, Undergraduate*/methods, Humans ; Female ; Social Identification ; Dissection/education ; Schools, Medical ; Cadaver
مستخلص: Background: As technology advances, some schools are moving away from human cadaveric dissection to teach anatomy, leading to concern regarding the possible loss of a professional identity building experience. This study explored the role of dissection in students' professional identity formation.
Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted using survey methodology and semi-structured interviews of medical students at an American-style graduate-entry medical school in Singapore. The questionnaire adopted the conceptual framework of the Ring Theory of Personhood and the MacLeod-Clark Professional Identity Scale was used to measure professional identity, followed by semi-structured interviews of students using Braun and Clarke's six-phase reflexive thematic analysis.
Results: Respondents did not differ substantively from non-respondents by age, nationality, or ethnicity, and year of entering medical school, however, they were slightly more female dominant. The number of hours of hands-on participation in dissection showed no significant relationship (r 2  = 0.010; p = 0.424) with professional identity formation measured by the MacLeod-Clark Professional Identity Scale. Despite the survey results, semi-structured interviews revealed rich and nuanced findings suggesting the influence of dissection in participants' professional identity formation through deepening students' appreciation of humanistic values and enhancing their notions of patients' personhood. Notably, students without dissection experience did not express these sentiments and were orientated towards knowledge acquisition.
Conclusion: While our findings do not suggest that dissection strongly impacts students' professional identity formation, students shared thought-provoking experiences which suggest some level of its contribution. Careful consideration of this phenomenon should be exercised prior to removing dissection in favour of technological alternatives.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)
References: Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48(3):153–69. (PMID: 10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.153)
Abrams MP, Eckert T, Topping D, Daly KD. Reflective writing on the cadaveric dissection experience: an effective tool to assess the impact of dissection on learning of anatomy, humanism, empathy, well-being, and professional identity formation in medical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(5):658–65. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.2025)
McBride JM, Drake RL. National survey on anatomical sciences in medical education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1):7–14. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.1760)
Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(2):83–93. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.139)
Guttmann GD, Drake RL, Trelease RB. To what extent is cadaver dissection necessary to learn medical gross anatomy? A debate forum. The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist. 2004;281B(1):2–3. (PMID: 10.1002/ar.b.20042)
McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ. 2004;38(4):418–24. (PMID: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01795.x)
Shin M, Prasad A, Sabo G, Macnow ASR, Sheth NP, Cross MB, et al. Anatomy education in US medical schools: before, during, and beyond COVID-19. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):103. (PMID: 10.1186/s12909-022-03177-1)
Brassett C, Cosker T, Davies DC, Dockery P, Gillingwater TH, Lee TC, et al. COVID-19 and anatomy: stimulus and initial response. J Anat. 2020;237(3):393–403. (PMID: 10.1111/joa.13274)
Ortadeveci A, Ermez MN, Oz S, Ozden H. A survey study on distance anatomy education: challenges unique to anatomy. Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed). 2022;44(1):41–7. (PMID: 10.1007/s00276-021-02772-z)
Holden M, Buck E, Clark M, Szauter K, Trumble J. Professional identity formation in medical education: the convergence of multiple domains. HEC Forum. 2012;24(4):245–55. (PMID: 10.1007/s10730-012-9197-6)
Ibarra H. Provisional selves: experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(4):764–91. (PMID: 10.2307/2667055)
Weaver R, Peters K, Koch J, Wilson I. ‘Part of the team’: professional identity and social exclusivity in medical students. Med Educ. 2011;45(12):1220–9. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04046.x)
Jarvis-Selinger S, MacNeil KA, Costello GRL, Lee K, Holmes CL. Understanding professional identity formation in early clerkship: A novel framework. Acad Med. 2019;94(10):1574–80. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002835)
Monrouxe LV, Rees CE, Hu W. Differences in medical students’ explicit discourses of professionalism: acting, representing, becoming. Med Educ. 2011;45(6):585–602. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03878.x)
Lempp HK. Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Med Educ. 2005;39(3):318–25. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02095.x)
Yeager VL. Learning gross anatomy: dissection and prosection. Clin Anat. 1996;9(1):57–9. (PMID: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1996)9:1<57::AID-CA12>3.0.CO;2-9)
Thompson AR, Marshall AM. Participation in dissection affects student performance on gross anatomy practical and written examinations: results of a four-year comparative study. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(1):30–6. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.1859)
Johnson JH. Importance of dissection in learning anatomy: personal dissection versus peer teaching. Clin Anat. 2002;15(1):38–44. (PMID: 10.1002/ca.1090)
Abdel Meguid EM, Khalil MK. Measuring medical students' motivation to learning anatomy by cadaveric dissection. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(4):363–71. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.1669)
Wilson AB, Miller CH, Klein BA, Taylor MA, Goodwin M, Boyle EK, et al. A meta-analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies. Clin Anat. 2018;31(1):122–33. (PMID: 10.1002/ca.22934)
Triepels CPR, Smeets CFA, Notten KJB, Kruitwagen RFPM, Futterer JJ, Vergeldt TFM, et al. Does three-dimensional anatomy improve student understanding? Clin Anat. 2020;33(1):25–33. (PMID: 10.1002/ca.23405)
Weeks SE, Harris EE, Kinzey WG. Human gross anatomy: A crucial time to encourage respect and compassion in students. Clin Anat. 1995;8(1):69–79. (PMID: 10.1002/ca.980080113)
Sathvika SV, Yuvaraj MF, Karunakaran B, Gunapriya R, Kumaresan M, Begum Z, et al. Donor oath: respect to the mortal teacher to learn ethics and humanitarian values of anatomy. Cureus. 2022;14(3).
Rathbone A, Nazar H, Harburn J, Todd A, Husband AK. Exploring undergraduate pharmacy student experiences of learning human anatomy using cadaveric specimens. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(8):7103. (PMID: 10.5688/ajpe7103)
Shiozawa T, Glauben M, Banzhaf M, Griewatz J, Hirt B, Zipfel S, et al. An insight into professional identity formation: qualitative analyses of two reflection interventions during the dissection course. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):320–32. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.1917)
Parker E, Randall V. Learning beyond the basics of cadaveric dissection: a qualitative analysis of non-academic learning in anatomy education. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(1):147–53. (PMID: 10.1007/s40670-020-01147-0)
Radzi S, Chandrasekaran R, Peh ZK, Rajalingam P, Yeong WY, Mogali SR. Students' learning experiences of three-dimensional printed models and plastinated specimens: a qualitative analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):695. (PMID: 10.1186/s12909-022-03756-2)
Mount GR, Kahlke R, Melton J, Varpio L. A critical review of professional identity formation interventions in medical education. Acad Med. 2022;97(11S):S96–S106. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004904)
Cohen MJM, Kay A, Youakim JM, Balaicuis JM. Identity transformation in medical students. Am J Psychoanal. 2009;69(1):43–52. (PMID: 10.1057/ajp.2008.38)
Sharpless J, Baldwin N, Cook R, Kofman A, Morley-Fletcher A, Slotkin R, et al. The becoming: students’ reflections on the process of professional identity formation in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):713–7. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000729)
Mahajan R, Goyal PK, Singh T. Professional identity formation of medical educators: A thematic analysis of enabling factors and competencies needed. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2022;12(3):189–95. (PMID: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_257_22)
Rivard SJ, Vitous CA, De Roo AC, Bamdad MC, Jafri SM, Byrnes ME, et al. “The captain of the ship.” A qualitative investigation of surgeon identity formation. Am J Surg 2022;224(1):284-291.
Radha Krishna LK, Alsuwaigh R. Understanding the fluid nature of personhood – the ring theory of personhood. Bioethics. 2015;29(3):171–81. (PMID: 10.1111/bioe.12085)
Sarraf-Yazdi S, Teo YN, How AEH, Teo YH, Goh S, Kow CS, et al. A scoping review of professional identity formation in undergraduate medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(11):3511–21. (PMID: 10.1007/s11606-021-07024-9)
Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG. The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire: score validity among medicine residents. Med Educ. 2011;45(12):1230–40. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04077.x)
Duncan T, Pintrich P, Smith D, McKeachie W. Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) Manual; 2015.
Baldner C, McGinley JJ. Correlational and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) of commonly used empathy questionnaires: new insights. Motiv Emot. 2014;38(5):727–44. (PMID: 10.1007/s11031-014-9417-2)
Davis M. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog Sel Doc Psychol. 1980;10.
Toosi M, Modarres M, Amini M, Geranmayeh M. A survey of midwifery graduates’ opinions about midwifery education in Iran: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1):340. (PMID: 10.1186/s12909-021-02764-y)
Strachan K, Ansari AA. Feasibility and psychometric analysis of graduate satisfaction survey of medical students graduating from the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain (RCSI Bahrain). SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):311. (PMID: 10.1186/s40064-016-1957-3)
AAMC. Association of American Medical College (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) 2023 [Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/report/graduation-questionnaire-gq .
AAMC. 2022 Association of American Medical College Medical (AAMC) School Graduation Questionnaire 2022 [Available from: https://www.aamc.org/media/59071/download?attachment .
Worthington M, Salamonson Y, Weaver R, Cleary M. Predictive validity of the Macleod Clark professional identity scale for undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(3):187–91. (PMID: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.01.012)
Adams K, Hean S, Sturgis P, Frcn J. Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learn Health Soc Care. 2006;5:55–68. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1473-6861.2006.00119.x)
O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388)
Terry G, Hayfield N, Clarke V, Braun V. The SAGE Handbook of qualitative research in psychology. 2017 2023/03/16. 55 City road. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Available from: https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research-in-psychology .
Flack NAMS, Nicholson HD. What do medical students learn from dissection? Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(4):325–35. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.1758)
Coulehan JL, Williams PC, Landis D, Naser C. The first patient: reflections and stories about the anatomy cadaver. Teaching and learning in medicine. 1995;7(1):61–6. (PMID: 10.1080/10401339509539712)
Hafferty FW. Cadaver stories and the emotional socialization of medical students. J Health Soc Behav. 1988;29(4):344–56. (PMID: 10.2307/2136868)
Hartmann CA, Hutchinson EF, Kramer B. Anatomy: an opportunity for south African health science students to discuss their emotional responses to human remains in the laboratory. Educ Sci. 2022;12(6):367. (PMID: 10.3390/educsci12060367)
O’Doherty D, Culhane A, O’Doherty J, Harney S, Glynn L, McKeague H, et al. Medical students and clinical placements - a qualitative study of the continuum of professional identity formation. Education for. Primary Care. 2021;32(4):202–10. (PMID: 10.1080/14739879.2021.1879684)
Gaufberg E, Bor D, Dinardo P, Krupat E, Pine E, Ogur B, et al. In pursuit of educational integrity: professional identity formation in the Harvard Medical School Cambridge integrated clerkship. Perspect Biol Med. 2017;60(2):258–74. (PMID: 10.1353/pbm.2017.0032)
Rocha AOD, Júnior MAF, Girotto MC, Moraes MPOD, Thomaz GDGR, Campos DD, et al. Brazilian ceremony in honor of body donors. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research. 2018;6(2):264–73. (PMID: 10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss2.933)
Souza AD, Kotian SR, Pandey AK, Rao P, Kalthur SG. Cadaver as a first teacher: A module to learn the ethics and values of cadaveric dissection. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2020;15(2):94–101. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.03.002)
Rizzolo LJ. Human dissection: an approach to interweaving the traditional and humanistic goals of medical education. Anat Rec. 2002;269(6):242–8. (PMID: 10.1002/ar.10188)
Dickinson GE, Lancaster CJ, Winfield IC, Reece EF, Colthorpe CA. Detached concern and death anxiety of first-year medical students: before and after the gross anatomy course. Clin Anat. 1997;10(3):201–7. (PMID: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:3<201::AID-CA5>3.0.CO;2-W)
Štrkalj GAP. Nalini. Commemorations and Memorials.
da Rocha AO, Maués JL, Chies GAF, da Silva AP. Assessing the impact of a ceremony in honor of the body donors in the development of ethical and humanistic attitudes among medical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(4):467–74. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.1920)
Goss AL, Viswanathan VB, DeLisser HM. Not just a specimen: A qualitative study of emotion, morality, and professionalism in one medical school gross anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(4):349–59. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.1868)
Mazor KM, Beard RL, Alexander GL, Arora NK, Firneno C, Gaglio B, et al. Patients' and family members' views on patient-centered communication during cancer care. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(11):2487–95. (PMID: 10.1002/pon.3317)
Coulter A. Patients' Views of the good doctor: doctors have to earn Patients' Trust. BMJ: Br Med J 2002;325(7366):668–669. (PMID: 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.668)
Georgopoulou S, Nel L, Sangle SR, D’Cruz DP. Physician–patient interaction and medication adherence in lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2020;29(10):1168–78. (PMID: 10.1177/0961203320935977)
Kerse N, Buetow S, Mainous AG 3rd, Young G, Coster G, Arroll B. Physician-patient relationship and medication compliance: a primary care investigation. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(5):455–61. (PMID: 10.1370/afm.139)
Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2009;47(8):826–34. (PMID: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a5acc)
Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R. Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):359–64. (PMID: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1)
Weeger S, Farin E. The effect of the patient-physician relationship on health-related quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(5):468–76. (PMID: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1146360)
Ruben BD. Communication theory and health communication practice: the more things change, the more they stay the Same1. Health Commun. 2016;31(1):1–11. (PMID: 10.1080/10410236.2014.923086)
Kumar Ghosh S, Kumar A. Building professionalism in human dissection room as a component of hidden curriculum delivery: A systematic review of good practices. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(2):210–21. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.1836)
MacPherson E, Lisk K. The value of in-person undergraduate dissection in anatomical education in the time of Covid-19. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(4):797–802. (PMID: 10.1002/ase.2186)
Miyoshi M, Mori T, Tanimura C, Nakane H, Mukuda T, Okazaki K, et al. Impact of hands-on experience of a cadaver dissection on the professional identity formation of health sciences students. Yonago Acta Medica. 2019;62(1):131–6. (PMID: 10.33160/yam.2019.03.018)
Chang HJ, Kim HJ, Rhyu IJ, Lee YM, Uhm CS. Emotional experiences of medical students during cadaver dissection and the role of memorial ceremonies: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):255. (PMID: 10.1186/s12909-018-1358-0)
Iorio S, Cilione M, Martini M, Tofani M, Gazzaniga V. Soft skills are hard skills; A historical perspective. Medicina. 2022;58(8):1044. (PMID: 10.3390/medicina58081044)
Simpson M, Buckman R, Stewart M, Maguire P, Lipkin M, Novack D, et al. Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. Br Med J. 1991;303(6814):1385–7. (PMID: 10.1136/bmj.303.6814.1385)
Katsaliaki K. Evaluating patient and medical staff satisfaction from doctor–patient communication. Int J Health Care Qual Assurance. 2022;35(1):38–55. (PMID: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2022-0033)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Human cadaveric dissection; Medical students; Professional identity formation
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20231220 Date Completed: 20231221 Latest Revision: 20240117
رمز التحديث: 20240118
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10731900
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04913-x
PMID: 38114993
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1472-6920
DOI:10.1186/s12909-023-04913-x