دورية أكاديمية

Preference Signaling Survey of Program Directors-After the Match.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Preference Signaling Survey of Program Directors-After the Match.
المؤلفون: Suresh KV; From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital (Suresh, Mun, LaPorte, and Aiyer), and the School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (Covarrubias)., Covarrubias O, Mun F, LaPorte DM, Aiyer AA
المصدر: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons [J Am Acad Orthop Surg] 2024 Mar 01; Vol. 32 (5), pp. 220-227. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 03.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9417468 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1940-5480 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1067151X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2016- : Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer
Original Publication: Rosemont, IL : American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, c1993-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Internship and Residency* , Orthopedics*, Humans ; United States ; Retrospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Databases, Factual
مستخلص: Introduction: The 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic residency cycle implemented a preference signaling program (PSP), allowing applicants to send "signals" to up to 30 programs to demonstrate their genuine interest. With the conclusion of the 2022 to 2023 cycle, the primary purpose of this study was to analyze program director (PD) perceptions of the PSP after the match cycle and provide a retrospective evaluation of the effects of the PSP on the orthopaedic resident selection process.
Methods: A 21-question survey was distributed to 98 PDs (32.7% response rate). Contact information was obtained from a national database.
Results: Most respondents (96.9%) participated in the American Orthopaedic Association's PSP. The majority (93.7%) view preference signaling as a positive change. Most PDs (56.2%) reported a decreased number in applications received compared with previous years. Receiving a preference signal was ranked among the most important factors in resident selection, and most PDs agreed that preference signaling should be used to screen applicants (84.4%) and differentiate similar applicants (96.8%). Moreover, 65.6% of PDs indicated that they would not rank or invite applicants to interview without a signal or completion of a formal away rotation. PDs report that in the 2022 to 2023 cycle, 98.5% of applicants who matched at their program had sent a preference signal.
Discussion: Preference signaling was one of the most important factors assessed during its inaugural application cycle and is anticipated to remain a key tool for screening and differentiating candidates. Applicants should strategically select signal recipients to enhance their success in the match.
(Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)
References: Mun F, Suresh KV, Li TP, Aiyer AA, LaPorte DM: Preference signaling for orthopaedic surgery applicants: A survey of residency program directors. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022;30:1140-1145.
Feroe AG, Smartt AA, Pulos N, Aiyer AA, Levine WN, Barlow JD: Preference-signaling during the orthopaedic surgery residency application process. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023;31:1-6.
Salehi PP, Azizzadeh B, Lee YH: Preference signaling for competitive residency programs in the NRMP. J Grad Med Educ 2019;11:733-734.
Bernstein J: Not the last word: Want to match in an orthopaedic surgery residency? Send a rose to the program director. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475:2845-2849.
Grauer R, Ranti D, Greene K, Gorin MA, Menon M, Zorc S: Characterization of applicant preference signals, invitations for interviews, and inclusion on match lists for residency positions in urology. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2250974.
Pletcher SD, Chang CWD, Thorne MC, Malekzadeh S: The otolaryngology residency program preference signaling experience. Acad Med 2022;97:664-668.
Archives. NRMP. https://www.nrmp.org/match-data-analytics/archives/ . Accessed May 2, 2023.
Chang CWD, Thorne MC, Malekzadeh S, Pletcher SD: Two-year interview and match outcomes of otolaryngology preference signaling. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023;168:377-383.
O'Sullivan L, Kagabo W, Prasad N, Laporte D, Aiyer A: Racial and ethnic bias in medical school clinical grading: A Review. J Surg Educ 2023;80:806-816.
Hill KA, Desai MM, Chaudhry SI, et al.: Association of marginalized identities with alpha omega alpha honor society and gold humanism honor society membership among medical students. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2229062.
Raman T, Alrabaa RG, Sood A, Maloof P, Benevenia J, Berberian W: Does residency selection criteria predict performance in orthopaedic surgery residency? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474:908-914.
Cohn MR, Bigach SD, Bernstein DN, et al.: Resident selection in the wake of United States medical licensing examination Step 1 transition to pass/fail scoring. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28:865-873.
Sandler AB, Scanaliato JP, LaPorte DM, Nesti L, Dunn AJC: Resident selection: An orthopaedic program director survey. J Surg Orthop Adv 2022;31:42-47.
Jarvis N, Gendreau J, Brown N, Noland S: Increasing research output among orthopedic surgery applicants. J Surg Educ 2023;80:15-16.
Toci GR, Elsner JA, Bigelow BF, Bryant BR, LaPorte DM: Medical student research productivity: Which variables are associated with matching to a highly ranked orthopaedic residency program? J Surg Educ 2021;78:512-518.
Trikha R, Keswani A, Ishmael CR, Greig D, Kelley BV, Bernthal NM: Current trends in orthopaedic surgery residency applications and match rates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020;102:e24.
Dugarte AJ, Paull TZ, Schroder LK, Cole PA: Effectiveness of an orthopaedic trauma research fellowship to produce successfully matching residents. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023;31:852-859.
Cotter EJ, Polce EM, Lee E, et al.: Incidence of research gap years in orthopaedic residency applicants: The new standard? J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2021;5:e21.00247.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240104 Date Completed: 20240226 Latest Revision: 20240226
رمز التحديث: 20240226
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00579
PMID: 38175998
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1940-5480
DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00579