دورية أكاديمية
Carbon trade-off and energy budgeting under conventional and conservation tillage in a rice-wheat double cropping system.
| العنوان: | Carbon trade-off and energy budgeting under conventional and conservation tillage in a rice-wheat double cropping system. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Ahmad N; College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China; Key Laboratory of Crop Physi-ecology and Tillage Science in Northwestern Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China., Virk AL; State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China., Nizami AS; Sustainable Development Study Centre, Government College University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan., Lal R; CFAES Rattan Lal Center for Carbon Management & Sequestration, The Ohio State University, 210 Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Rd, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA., Chang SX; Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada., Hafeez MB; College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China; Key Laboratory of Crop Physi-ecology and Tillage Science in Northwestern Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China., Guo X; College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China; Key Laboratory of Crop Physi-ecology and Tillage Science in Northwestern Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China., Wang R; College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China; Key Laboratory of Crop Physi-ecology and Tillage Science in Northwestern Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China., Wang X; College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China; Key Laboratory of Crop Physi-ecology and Tillage Science in Northwestern Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China., Iqbal HMW; Department of Agronomy, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef, University of Agriculture, Multan, 66000, Pakistan., Albasher G; Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia., Li J; College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China; Key Laboratory of Crop Physi-ecology and Tillage Science in Northwestern Loess Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China. Electronic address: junli@nwsuaf.edu.cn. |
| المصدر: | Journal of environmental management [J Environ Manage] 2024 Feb; Vol. 351, pp. 119888. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 04. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Academic Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0401664 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1095-8630 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03014797 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Environ Manage Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: London ; New York, Academic Press. |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Oryza* , Greenhouse Gases*, Soil/chemistry ; Triticum ; Carbon/analysis ; Carbon Dioxide ; Agriculture/methods ; Water |
| مستخلص: | Amid rising energy crises and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, designing energy efficient, GHG mitigation and profitable conservation farming strategies are pertinent for global food security. Therefore, we tested a hypothesis that no-till with residue retaining could improve energy productivity (EP) and energy use efficiency (EUE) while mitigating the carbon footprint (CF), water footprint (WF) and GHG emissions in rice-wheat double cropping system. We studied two tillage viz., conventional and conservation, with/without residue retaining, resulting as CT0 (puddled-transplanted rice, conventional wheat -residue), CTR (puddled-transplanted rice, conventional wheat + residue), NT0 (direct seeded rice, zero-till wheat -residue), and NTR (direct seeded rice, zero-till wheat + residue). The overall results showed that the NTR/NT0 had 34% less energy consumption and 1.2-time higher EP as compared to CTR/CT0. In addition, NTR increased 19.8% EUE than that of CT0. The grain yield ranged from 8.7 to 9.3 and 7.8-8.5 Mg ha -1 under CT and NT system, respectively. In NTR, CF and WF were 56.6% and 17.9% lower than that of CT0, respectively. The net GHG emissions were the highest (7261.4 kg CO Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Carbon footprint; Energy budgeting; Net CO(2) emission; Tillage; Water footprint |
| المشرفين على المادة: | 0 (Soil) 7440-44-0 (Carbon) 142M471B3J (Carbon Dioxide) 0 (Greenhouse Gases) 059QF0KO0R (Water) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240104 Date Completed: 20240115 Latest Revision: 20240115 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240115 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119888 |
| PMID: | 38176379 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1095-8630 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119888 |