دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Characterizing glare effects associated with diffractive optics in presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Characterizing glare effects associated with diffractive optics in presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.
المؤلفون: Łabuz G; From the The David J Apple Center for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Łabuz, Khoramnia, Yan, Auffarth, Naujokaitis, Tandogan); Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (van den Berg); Augenklinik Pallas, Olten, Switzerland (Tandogan)., Khoramnia R, Yan W, van den Berg TJTP, Auffarth GU, Naujokaitis T, Tandogan T
المصدر: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [J Cataract Refract Surg] 2024 Apr 01; Vol. 50 (4), pp. 413-419.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8604171 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1873-4502 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08863350 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Cataract Refract Surg Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2020- : [Hagerstown, MD] : Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS
Original Publication: [Fairfax, Va.] : American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, [c1986-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Presbyopia*/surgery , Lenses, Intraocular* , Lens, Crystalline*, Humans ; Glare ; Eyeglasses ; Prosthesis Design
مستخلص: Purpose: To objectively quantify glare of intraocular lenses (IOLs) using a diffractive principle to extend the visual range and to identify models with increased susceptibility to inducing glare.
Setting: David J Apple Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Design: Laboratory investigation.
Methods: Glare was assessed by means of a straylight parameter with a standard C-Quant intended for 7 degrees. In addition, 2 C-Quant modifications were used to test lower angles (ie, 2.5 degrees and 3.5 degrees). The following IOL models were assessed: PanOptix, AT Lisa Tri, Synergy, and Triumf, the latter 2 with chromatic aberration correction at distance. Straylight from trifocal IOLs was compared against a monofocal W-60R lens. The C-Quant test was performed through the studied IOLs by using additional optical components attached to their ocular.
Results: Straylight (deg 2 sr -1 ) of the control was <1 at all tested angles, with the trifocal models showing comparable straylight at 7 degrees. At 3.5 degrees, Triumf's straylight increased to 15.5 ± 0.6, followed by Synergy (6.2 ± 1.1), PanOptix (4.1 ± 0.3), and AT Lisa Tri (2.0 ± 0.8). The chromatic aberration-correcting models demonstrated correspondingly higher straylight (Synergy: 18.8 ± 1.3; Triumf: 17.3 ± 0.5) at 2.5 degrees compared with PanOptix (4.3 ± 0.4), AT Lisa Tri (2.1 ± 0.1), and monofocal IOLs yielding minimal or no increase.
Conclusions: Trifocal IOLs induced increased straylight, but it was limited to lower angles, which may cause difficulties detecting these effects using a standard clinical approach. The latest IOL designs featuring chromatic aberration correction at far focus seem more susceptible than the established trifocal IOLs to inducing a glare phenomenon.
(Copyright © 2024 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)
References: van den Berg TJ, Franssen L, Kruijt B, Coppens JE. History of ocular straylight measurement: a review. Z Med Phys 2013;23:6–20.
Vos J, Van den Berg T. Report on disability glare. CIE Collect 1999;135:1–9.
Van Den Berg TJ, Van Rijn LR, Michael R, Heine C, Coeckelbergh T, Nischler C, Wilhelm H, Grabner G, Emesz M, Barraquer RI, Coppens JE, Franssen L. Straylight effects with aging and lens extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:358–363.
Łabuz G, Reus NJ, Van Den Berg TJ. Ocular straylight in the normal pseudophakic eye. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:1406–1415.
van Bree MC, Zijlmans BL, van den Berg TJ. Effect of neodymium: YAG laser capsulotomy on retinal straylight values in patients with posterior capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1681–1686.
Łabuz G, Reus NJ, van den Berg TJ. Light scattering levels from intraocular lenses extracted from donor eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017;43:1207–1212.
Łabuz G, Yildirim TM, Khoramnia R, Son HS, Auffarth GU. Optical function of intraocular lenses in different opacification patterns: metrology analysis of 67 explants. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021;47:1210–1217.
Werner L, Stover JC, Schwiegerling J, Das KK. Effects of intraocular lens opacification on light scatter, stray light, and overall optical quality/performance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57:3239–3247.
Alba-Bueno F, Garzón N, Vega F, Poyales F, Millán MS. Patient-perceived and laboratory-measured halos associated with diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lenses. Curr Eye Res 2018;43:35–42.
Pieh S, Lackner B, Hanselmayer G, Zöhrer R, Sticker M, Weghaupt H, Fercher A, Skorpik C. Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:816–821.
de Vries NE, Franssen L, Webers CA, Tahzib NG, Cheng YY, Hendrikse F, Tjia KF, van den Berg TJ, Nuijts RM. Intraocular straylight after implantation of the multifocal AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:957–962.
Peng C, Zhao J, Ma L, Qu B, Sun Q, Zhang J. Optical performance after bilateral implantation of apodized aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses with +3.00-D addition power. Acta Ophthalmol 2012;90:e586–e593.
Monaco G, Gari M, Di Censo F, Poscia A, Ruggi G, Scialdone A. Visual performance after bilateral implantation of 2 new presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: trifocal versus extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017;43:737–747.
Cerviño A, Hosking SL, Montés-Micó R, Alió JL. Retinal straylight in patients with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:441–446.
Hofmann T, Zuberbuhler B, Cervino A, Montés-Micó R, Haefliger E. Retinal straylight and complaint scores 18 months after implantation of the AcrySof monofocal and ReSTOR diffractive intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2009;25:485–492.
Wilkins MR, Allan BD, Rubin GS, Findl O, Hollick EJ, Bunce C, Xing W; Moorfields IOL Study Group. Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2013;120:2449–2455.e2441.
Łabuz G, van den Berg TJ, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R. Light scattering from a diffractive-refractive intraocular lens: a goniometer-based approach for individual zone assessment. Biomed Opt Express 2022;13:6724–6732.
Millán MS, Vega F. Extended depth of focus intraocular lens. Chromatic performance. Biomed Opt Express 2017;8:4294–4309.
Łabuz G, Papadatou E, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. Longitudinal chromatic aberration and polychromatic image quality metrics of intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2018;34:832–838.
Loicq J, Willet N, Gatinel D. Topography and longitudinal chromatic aberration characterizations of refractive–diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019;45:1650–1659.
Łabuz G, Yan W, Baur ID, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. Comparison of five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: optical-bench assessment with visual-quality simulation. J Clin Med 2023;12:2523.
Van Den Berg TJTP, Franssen L, Coppens J. Straylight angular dependency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:4225.
Davison JA, Simpson MJ. History and development of the apodized diffractive intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:849–858.
Vega F, Valentino M, Rigato F, Millán MS. Optical design and performance of a trifocal sinusoidal diffractive intraocular lens. Biomed Opt Express 2021;12:3338–3351.
Yan W, Łabuz G, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. Trifocal intraocular lens selection: predicting visual function from optical quality measurements. J Refract Surg 2023;39:111–118.
Ribeiro FJ, Ferreira TB, Silva D, Matos AC, Gaspar S. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens that combines extended depth-of-focus and multifocal profiles. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021;47:1448–1453.
Miret JJ, Camps VJ, García C, Caballero MT, Gonzalez-Leal JM. Analysis and comparison of monofocal, extended depth of focus and trifocal intraocular lens profiles. Sci Rep 2022;12:8654.
Franssen L, Coppens JE, van den Berg TJ. Compensation comparison method for assessment of retinal straylight. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:768–776.
Michael R, Van Rijn LJ, Van Den Berg TJ, Barraquer RI, Grabner G, Wilhelm H, Coeckelbergh T, Emesz M, Marvan P, Nischler C. Association of lens opacities, intraocular straylight, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in European drivers. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 2009;87:666–671.
Łabuz G, Vargas-Martín F, van den Berg TJ, López-Gil N. Method for in vitro assessment of straylight from intraocular lenses. Biomed Opt Express 2015;6:4457–4464.
Łabuz G, Papadatou E, Vargas-Martín F, López-Gil N, Reus NJ, van den Berg TJP. Validation of a spectral light scattering method to differentiate large from small particles in intraocular lenses. Biomed Opt Express 2017;8:1889–1894.
Arias A, Ginis H, Artal P. Straylight in different types of intraocular lenses. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2020;9:16.
de Vries NE, Nuijts RM. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:268–278.
Torky MA, Nokrashy AE, Metwally H, Abdelhameed AG. Visual performance following implantation of presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses. Eye (Lond) 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35941184/.
Ferreira TB, Ribeiro FJ, Silva D, Matos AC, Gaspar S, Almeida S. Comparison of refractive and visual outcomes of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2022;48:280–287.
–42. References 36–42 are listed in Supplemental Data File 1 ( http://links.lww.com/JRS/B68 ).
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240118 Date Completed: 20240326 Latest Revision: 20240326
رمز التحديث: 20240326
DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001398
PMID: 38237073
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1873-4502
DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001398