دورية أكاديمية
Single incision robotic cystectomy and urinary diversion.
| العنوان: | Single incision robotic cystectomy and urinary diversion. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Tyson MD; Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA. Tyson.Mark@mayo.edu. |
| المصدر: | World journal of urology [World J Urol] 2024 Jan 20; Vol. 42 (1), pp. 45. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 20. |
| نوع المنشور: | Review; Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Springer International Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 8307716 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1433-8726 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 07244983 NLM ISO Abbreviation: World J Urol Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: [Berlin ; New York] : Springer International, 1983- |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Robotics* , Robotic Surgical Procedures*/methods , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms*/surgery , Urinary Diversion*/methods , Surgical Wound*/surgery, Humans ; Cystectomy/methods ; Treatment Outcome |
| مستخلص: | Purpose: In this review, we aim to provide readers with a balanced understanding of all aspects of single incision robotic cystectomy (SIRC) and urinary diversion using the single-port (SP) robot. The review will trace the historical progression from open surgery to the introduction of minimally invasive approaches and present an in-depth description of the SIRC technique, offering a step-by-step guide for reference. Emphasis will be placed on indications and patient selection criteria to equip surgeons with well-rounded insights for decision-making. Methods: The review analyzes preliminary surgical outcomes by drawing from existing literature and clinical experiences, endeavoring to present a balanced view of the potential benefits and limitations. Addressing the learning curve and training prerequisites is paramount, and this review explores strategies and challenges in preparing surgeons for proficiency. Finally, the focus shifts to current challenges and future directions, identifying key issues and potential advancements in the field. Conclusions: By presenting historical context, technical insights, clinical evidence, and strategic foresight, the review aims to provide a comprehensive resource that engages surgeons, researchers, and trainees from diverse perspectives. (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.) |
| References: | Dalbagni G, Genega E, Hashibe M et al (2001) Cystectomy for bladder cancer: a contemporary series. J Urol 165:1111. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66440-311257649) Stimson CJ, Chang SS, Barocas DA et al (2010) Early and late perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy: 90-day readmissions, morbidity and mortality in a contemporary series. J Urol 184:1296. (PMID: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.00720723939) Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP et al (1992) Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol 148:1140. (PMID: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36843-X1404624) Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A et al (2003) Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 92:232. (PMID: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04329.x12887473) Tyson M, Andrews P, Cheney S et al (2021) Single incision robotic cystectomy and hybrid orthotopic neobladder reconstruction: a step by step description. Urology 156:285. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.03334274390) Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP et al (2018) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 391:2525. (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-629976469) Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD et al (2015) Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 67:1042. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.04325496767) Catto JWF, Khetrapal P, Ricciardi F et al (2022) Effect of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy on 90-day morbidity and mortality among patients with bladder cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 328:1258. (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2022.1360036166034) Tyson MD, Mi L (2023) Preliminary surgical outcomes after single incision robotic cystectomy (SIRC). Urology 171:127. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.06136402270) Kaouk J, Garisto J, Eltemamy M et al (2019) Single-port robotic intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion during radical cystectomy using the SP surgical system: step-by-step technique. Urology 130:196. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.02330965039) Kaouk J, Aminsharifi A, Sawczyn G et al (2020) Single-port robotic urological surgery using purpose-built single-port surgical system: single-institutional experience with the first 100 cases. Urology 140:77. (PMID: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.08632142725) Ali D, Sawhney R, Billah M et al (2022) Single-port robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal bowel diversion: initial experience and review of surgical outcomes. J Endourol 36:216. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2021.028734605663) Gross JT, Vetter JM, Sands KG et al (2021) Initial experience with single-port robot-assisted radical cystectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes between single-port and conventional multiport approaches. J Endourol 35:1177. (PMID: 10.1089/end.2020.122733677991) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Bladder cancer; Cystectomy; Single-port robot; Urinary diversion |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240120 Date Completed: 20240122 Latest Revision: 20240122 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240122 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00345-023-04751-y |
| PMID: | 38244073 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Find this article in full text from Springer Verlag. 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1433-8726 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00345-023-04751-y |