دورية أكاديمية

How to perform standardized sonographic examination of Cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: How to perform standardized sonographic examination of Cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester.
المؤلفون: Verberkt C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute 'Amsterdam Reproduction and Development', Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Jordans IPM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute 'Amsterdam Reproduction and Development', Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., van den Bosch T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium., Timmerman D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium., Bourne T; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK., de Leeuw RA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Huirne JAF; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
المصدر: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology [Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol] 2024 Sep; Vol. 64 (3), pp. 412-418. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 25.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9108340 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1469-0705 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09607692 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2003- : Chichester, West Sussex, UK : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original Publication: Carnforth, Lancs, UK ; Park Ridge, N.J., USA : Parthenon Pub., c1991-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Cesarean Section*/adverse effects , Cicatrix*/diagnostic imaging , Cicatrix*/etiology , Pregnancy Trimester, First* , Pregnancy, Ectopic*/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy, Ectopic*/etiology , Ultrasonography, Prenatal*/standards, Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Gestational Sac/diagnostic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
مستخلص: Early diagnosis and appropriate management of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) are crucial to prevent severe complications, such as uterine rupture, severe hemorrhage and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. In this article, we provide a step-by-step tutorial for the standardized sonographic evaluation of CSP in the first trimester. Practical steps for performing a standardized transvaginal ultrasound examination to diagnose CSP are outlined, focusing on criteria and techniques essential for accurate identification and classification. Key sonographic markers, including gestational sac location, cardiac activity, placental implantation and myometrial thickness, are detailed. The evaluation process is presented according to assessment of the uterine scar, differential diagnosis, detailed CSP evaluation and CSP classification. This step-by-step tutorial emphasizes the importance of scanning in two planes (sagittal and transverse), utilizing color or power Doppler and differentiating CSP from other low-lying pregnancies. The CSP classification is described in detail and is based on the location of the largest part of the gestational sac relative to the uterine cavity and serosal lines. This descriptive classification is recommended for clinical use to stimulate uniform description and evaluation. Such a standardized sonographic evaluation of CSP in the first trimester is essential for early diagnosis and management, helping to prevent life-threatening complications and to preserve fertility. Training sonographers in detailed evaluation techniques and promoting awareness of CSP are critical. The structured approach to CSP diagnosis presented herein is supported by a free e-learning course available online. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
(© 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)
References: Jordans IPM, Verberkt C, De Leeuw RA, et al. Definition and sonographic reporting system for Cesarean scar pregnancy in early gestation: modified Delphi method. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;59:437‐449.
Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:247‐253.
Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First‐trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:220‐227.
Asif S, Aijawi S, Agten AK. Caesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2021;31:271‐274.
Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005671.
Timor‐Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Calì G, D'Antonio F, Kaelin Agten A. Cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis and pathogenesis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2019;46:797‐811.
Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24:731‐738.
Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114:253‐263.
Timor‐Tritsch IE, Khatib N, Monteagudo A, Ramos J, Berg R, Kovács S. Cesarean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:601‐610.
Timor‐Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow‐up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:44.e1–13.
Seow KM, Hwang JL, Tsai YL. Ultrasound diagnosis of a pregnancy in a Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:547‐549.
Osborn DA, Williams TR, Craig BM. Cesarean scar pregnancy: sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, and treatment. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:1449‐1456.
Seah SC, Laili SAL, Hairiah A, Ab Rahim AG. Catching an ectopic caesarean scar pregnancy ‐ Radiological perspective. Med J Malaysia. 2018;73:51‐53.
Wu R, Klein MA, Mahboob S, Gupta M, Katz DS. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to ultrasound in evaluating cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2013;3:16.
Riaz RM, Williams TR, Craig BM, Myers DT. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: imaging features, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2589‐2599.
Silver RM. Implications of the first cesarean: perinatal and future reproductive health and subsequent cesareans, placentation issues, uterine rupture risk, morbidity, and mortality. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36:315‐323.
O'Neill SM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, et al. Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG. 2013;120:671‐680.
Calì G, Timor‐Tritsch IE, Palacios‐Jaraquemada J, et al. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:169‐175.
Zhang Y, Gu Y, Wang J‐M, Li Y. Analysis of cases with cesarean scar pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39:195‐202.
Frijlingh M, Juffermans L, de Leeuw RA, et al. How to use power Doppler ultrasound in transvaginal assessment of uterine fibroids. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60:277‐283.
Kuleva M, Castaing O, Fries N, et al. A standardized approach for the assessment of the lower uterine segment at first trimester by transvaginal ultrasound: a flash study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:1376‐1381.
Kaelin Agten A, Cali G, Monteagudo A, Oviedo J, Ramos J, Timor‐Tritsch I. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted “on the scar” versus “in the niche”. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:510.e1‐510.e6.
Timor‐Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, El Refaey H, Kaelin Agten A, Arslan AA. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:225.e1–7.
Cali G, Forlani F, Timor‐Tritsch IE, Palacios‐Jaraquemada J, Minneci G, D'Antonio F. Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:100‐104.
Lin SY, Hsieh CJ, Tu YA, et al. New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: an observational cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0202020.
Zhang H, Huang J, Wu X, Fan H, Li H, Gao T. Clinical classification and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;43:653‐661.
ESHRE working group on Ectopic Pregnancy,   Kirk E, Ankum P, et al. Terminology for describing normally sited and ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound: ESHRE recommendations for good practice. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020:hoaa055.
Verberkt C, Lemmers M, de Leeuw RA, et al. Effectiveness, complications, and reproductive outcomes after cesarean scar pregnancy management: a retrospective cohort study. AJOG Glob Rep. 2023;3:100143.
Meyer R, Friedrich L, Plaschkes R, et al. Clinical implications of a cesarean scar pregnancy sonographic evaluation and reporting system. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023;291:247‐251.
Jauniaux E, D'Antonio F, Bhide A, et al. Modified Delphi study of ultrasound signs associated with placenta accreta spectrum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61:518‐525.
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: CSP; Cesarean scar defect; Cesarean scar pregnancy; Cesarean section; classification; diagnosis; first trimester; measurements; niche; practical guideline; sonography; transvaginal ultrasound; ultrasonography
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240203 Date Completed: 20240903 Latest Revision: 20240918
رمز التحديث: 20240918
DOI: 10.1002/uog.27604
PMID: 38308856
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1469-0705
DOI:10.1002/uog.27604