دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Comparison of salpingectomy and tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinx in in-vitro fertilization outcome.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparison of salpingectomy and tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinx in in-vitro fertilization outcome.
المؤلفون: Tjahyadi D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia., Udayana IS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia., Nisa AS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia., Rachmawati A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia., Djuwantono T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
المصدر: Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) [Ann Med Surg (Lond)] 2024 Jan 03; Vol. 86 (2), pp. 886-890. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jan 03 (Print Publication: 2024).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101616869 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2049-0801 (Print) Linking ISSN: 20490801 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: 2023- : [London] : Wolters Kluwer
Original Publication: London : Surgical Associates Ltd., 2012-
مستخلص: The occurrence of hydrosalpinx can reduce the success rate of assisted reproductive technology. The laparoscopic salpingectomy and tubal occlusion have been shown to improve in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in this disease. The primary goal of this review was to assess and compare the IVF outcome following salpingectomy or tubal occlusion in the published literature. The authors included studies with at least one of the following outcomes: days of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, retrieved oocyte number, fertilization rates, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, or ectopic pregnancy rate. In conclusion, proximal tubal occlusion outperforms salpingectomy in terms of fertilization rate while offering no evident advantages in terms of days of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, retrieved oocytes number, IVF results, or problems in treating hydrosalpinx patients prior to IVF. These data may help clinicians choose the best therapy for patients with hydrosalpinx prior to IVF.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that we have no conflicts of interests.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
References: Hum Reprod. 2007 Jun;22(6):1506-12. (PMID: 17376819)
Fertil Steril. 2006 Dec;86(6):1642-9. (PMID: 17069813)
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(6):547-50. (PMID: 25436898)
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Feb;25(1):86-92. (PMID: 31833424)
Hum Reprod. 2003 Dec;18(12):2634-7. (PMID: 14645184)
Front Surg. 2022 Apr 29;9:830612. (PMID: 35574522)
BJOG. 2004 Nov;111(11):1236-41. (PMID: 15521868)
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Sep;39(3):413-432. (PMID: 31324437)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13143. (PMID: 30508891)
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;43(4):304-310. (PMID: 33601465)
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Aug;59:41-47. (PMID: 30824209)
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2023 Dec;39(1):2249999. (PMID: 37625443)
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Jul;96(7):795-803. (PMID: 28471535)
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 May - Jun;24(4):563-578. (PMID: 28223181)
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Sep - Oct;26(6):1070-1075. (PMID: 30366115)
Lancet. 2002 Jul 13;360(9327):151-9. (PMID: 12126838)
Iran J Reprod Med. 2015 Aug;13(8):513-6. (PMID: 26568755)
Fertil Steril. 2001 Mar;75(3):612-7. (PMID: 11239550)
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):107-115. (PMID: 31580926)
Hum Reprod. 2016 Sep;31(9):2005-16. (PMID: 27209341)
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6S):S14-S15. (PMID: 27678764)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Sep;204:57-61. (PMID: 27522244)
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;19(4):360-5. (PMID: 17625419)
Hum Reprod. 2001 Nov;16(11):2418-21. (PMID: 11679531)
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2015 Sep;42(3):126-9. (PMID: 26473113)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: IVF; hydrosalpinx; salpingectomy; tubal occlusion
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240209 Latest Revision: 20240210
رمز التحديث: 20240210
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10849305
DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001548
PMID: 38333268
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2049-0801
DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000001548