دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

The impact of social hierarchies on neural response to feedback evaluations after advice giving.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The impact of social hierarchies on neural response to feedback evaluations after advice giving.
المؤلفون: Li J; Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, P.R. China.; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, P.R. China., Li M; School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, P.R. China., Sun Y; School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, P.R. China., Zhang G; Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, P.R. China.; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, P.R. China., Fan W; Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, P.R. China.; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, P.R. China., Zhong Y; Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, P.R. China.; Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, P.R. China.
المصدر: Human brain mapping [Hum Brain Mapp] 2024 Feb 01; Vol. 45 (2), pp. e26611.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9419065 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1097-0193 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10659471 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Hum Brain Mapp Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: New York : Wiley
Original Publication: New York : Wiley-Liss, c1993-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Hierarchy, Social* , Evoked Potentials*/physiology, Humans ; Feedback ; Brain/physiology ; Feedback, Psychological/physiology ; Electroencephalography
مستخلص: Advisors generally evaluate advisee-relevant feedback after advice giving. The response to these feedback-(1) whether the advice is accepted and (2) whether the advice is optimal-usually involves prestige. Prior literature has found that prestige is the basis by which individuals attain a superior status in the social hierarchy. However, whether advisors are motivated to attain a superior status when engaging in advice giving remains uncharacterized. Using event-related potentials, this study investigates how advisors evaluate feedback after giving advice to superior (vs. inferior) status advisees. A social hierarchy was first established based on two advisees (one was ranked as superior status and another as inferior status) as well as participants' performance in a dot-estimation task in which all participants were ranked as medium status. Participants then engaged in a game in which they were assigned roles as advisors to a superior or inferior status advisee. Afterward, the participants received feedback in two phases. In Phase 1, participants were told whether the advisees accepted the advice provided. In Phase 2, the participants were informed whether the advice they provided was correct. In these two phases, when the advisee was of superior status, participants exhibited stronger feedback-related negativity and P300 difference in response to (1) whether their advice was accepted, and (2) whether their advice was correct. Moreover, the P300 was notably larger when the participants' correct advice led to a gain for a superior-status advisee. In the context of advice giving, advisors are particularly motivated to attain a superior status when the feedback involving social hierarchies, which is reflected in higher sensitivity to feedback associated with superior status advisees at earlier and later stages during feedback evaluations in brains.
(© 2024 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
References: Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Jun;176:108-116. (PMID: 35381278)
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Dec;49(14):3891-7. (PMID: 22019775)
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Feb;23(1):125-141. (PMID: 36253608)
Brain Lang. 2014 Dec;139:84-98. (PMID: 25463819)
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Aug;103:59-68. (PMID: 28716612)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Feb 23;18(1):. (PMID: 36318468)
Science. 2002 Mar 22;295(5563):2279-82. (PMID: 11910116)
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Dec;18:99-104. (PMID: 28858638)
Neurosci Res. 2012 Apr;72(4):283-8. (PMID: 22285602)
J Appl Psychol. 2020 Apr;105(4):372-389. (PMID: 31414830)
Neuroreport. 2003 Dec 19;14(18):2481-4. (PMID: 14663214)
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 May;12(3):468-507. (PMID: 28544863)
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 May;100:108-128. (PMID: 30807783)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Mar;7(3):304-13. (PMID: 21421733)
Neuron. 2008 Apr 24;58(2):273-83. (PMID: 18439411)
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 01;11:2191. (PMID: 32982887)
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;127(4):2149-60. (PMID: 26853737)
Psychophysiology. 2021 May;58(5):e13798. (PMID: 33645762)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jan 21;7:936. (PMID: 24478667)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Nov 1;12(11):1730-1739. (PMID: 28981906)
Psychol Bull. 2005 Jul;131(4):510-32. (PMID: 16060800)
Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):913-7. (PMID: 17640267)
Brain Res. 2006 Aug 11;1105(1):93-101. (PMID: 16427615)
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Dec;27(4):e1615. (PMID: 29691918)
Psychophysiology. 2023 Apr;60(4):e14207. (PMID: 36322605)
Biol Psychol. 2019 Nov;148:107734. (PMID: 31352028)
Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 1;186:476-486. (PMID: 30439509)
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Oct;48(10):1516-1528. (PMID: 34554036)
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 May;44(5):746-761. (PMID: 29359627)
Psychophysiology. 2012 Dec;49(12):1579-89. (PMID: 23066877)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 May 19;15(3):285-291. (PMID: 32232371)
Biol Psychol. 2023 Feb;177:108506. (PMID: 36736571)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Oct 1;34(11):2028-2047. (PMID: 35900866)
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2128-48. (PMID: 17573239)
Nature. 2013 Sep 12;501(7466):179-84. (PMID: 24025838)
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):788-98. (PMID: 23964600)
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1255-65. (PMID: 22437511)
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 23;16:1062095. (PMID: 36507321)
Psychophysiology. 2010 Mar 1;47(2):260-70. (PMID: 20030755)
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):764-71. (PMID: 22653798)
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Feb;53(3):902-915. (PMID: 33378098)
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:159-68. (PMID: 23973408)
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:212368. (PMID: 26124852)
Biol Psychol. 2023 Mar;178:108519. (PMID: 36801355)
Ann Behav Med. 2002 Spring;24(2):122-31. (PMID: 12054317)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Mar;11(3):485-95. (PMID: 26516169)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Oct;10(10):1323-8. (PMID: 25698700)
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jun 19;12:111. (PMID: 29970993)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Nov 07;6:304. (PMID: 23162451)
Psychophysiology. 2011 Feb;48(2):229-40. (PMID: 20636297)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Jul 6;16(7):670-682. (PMID: 33769539)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Oct 09;6:278. (PMID: 23087632)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Mar 24;16(4):439-452. (PMID: 33527110)
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):574-601. (PMID: 25774679)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):111-121. (PMID: 32064532)
Neuroreport. 2005 Mar 15;16(4):407-11. (PMID: 15729147)
Psychophysiology. 2010 Mar 1;47(2):213-22. (PMID: 20074085)
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 15;245:118731. (PMID: 34788662)
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):1317-1326. (PMID: 30395315)
Psychophysiology. 2005 Mar;42(2):161-70. (PMID: 15787853)
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Jul;28(4):441-8. (PMID: 15289008)
Biol Psychol. 2019 Sep;146:107722. (PMID: 31226446)
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:238-244. (PMID: 31794955)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Apr;22(4):621-31. (PMID: 19320552)
Evol Hum Behav. 2001 May;22(3):165-196. (PMID: 11384884)
Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 19;8(1):2191. (PMID: 29259152)
Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529. (PMID: 7777651)
J Neurosci. 2004 Jul 14;24(28):6258-64. (PMID: 15254080)
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:1-5. (PMID: 31330246)
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Oct;132(Pt B):184-202. (PMID: 29454641)
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Oct;43:23-32. (PMID: 26163375)
Brain Res. 2009 Aug 25;1286:114-22. (PMID: 19539614)
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Sep;48(11):3343-50. (PMID: 20655319)
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21. (PMID: 15102499)
معلومات مُعتمدة: 23YJC190013 The MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences; GD23XXL13 Social Science Foundation of Guandong Province; 32000769 National Natural Science Foundation of China; 17ZDA326 National Social Science Fund of China; 2021JJ40337 the Natural Science Fund of Hunan Province
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: P300; advice giving; event related potentials (ERP); feedback evaluation; feedback-related negativity (FRN); social hierarchies
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240210 Date Completed: 20240214 Latest Revision: 20240214
رمز التحديث: 20240214
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC10839742
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26611
PMID: 38339957
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.26611