دورية أكاديمية

Longitudinal examination of alcohol demand and alcohol-related reinforcement as predictors of heavy drinking and adverse alcohol consequences in emerging adults.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Longitudinal examination of alcohol demand and alcohol-related reinforcement as predictors of heavy drinking and adverse alcohol consequences in emerging adults.
المؤلفون: Bird BM; Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada., Belisario K; Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada., Minhas M; Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada., Acuff SF; Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA., Ferro MA; School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada., Amlung MT; Cofrin Logan Center for Addiction Research and Treatment, Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA., Murphy JG; Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA., MacKillop J; Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
المصدر: Addiction (Abingdon, England) [Addiction] 2024 Jun; Vol. 119 (6), pp. 1090-1099. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 20.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9304118 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1360-0443 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09652140 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Addiction Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell
Original Publication: Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK : Carfax Pub. Co., c1993-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Reinforcement, Psychology* , Alcohol Drinking*/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking*/psychology, Humans ; Male ; Female ; Young Adult ; Longitudinal Studies ; Ontario/epidemiology ; Binge Drinking/epidemiology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Prospective Studies ; Economics, Behavioral ; Surveys and Questionnaires
مستخلص: Background and Aims: Behavioral economic theory predicts that high alcohol demand and high proportionate alcohol-related reinforcement are important determinants of risky alcohol use in emerging adults, but the majority of research to date has been cross-sectional in nature. The present study investigated prospective and dynamic relationships between alcohol demand and proportionate alcohol-related reinforcement in relation to heavy drinking days and alcohol problems.
Design: Longitudinal cohort with assessments every 4 months for 20 months.
Setting: Ontario, Canada.
Participants: Emerging adults reporting regular heavy episodic drinking (n = 636, M age  = 21.44; 55.8% female).
Measurements: Heavy drinking days (HDD; Daily Drinking Questionnaire), alcohol problems (Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire), alcohol demand (Alcohol Purchase Task) and proportionate alcohol-related reinforcement (Activity Level Questionnaire).
Findings: Linear mixed effects models revealed that behavioral economic indicators and alcohol-related outcomes significantly decreased over the study, consistent with 'aging out' of risky alcohol use. Random intercept cross-lagged panel models revealed significant between-person relationships, such that higher alcohol demand and alcohol-related reinforcement were positively associated with HDD and alcohol problems (random intercepts = 0.187-0.534, Ps < 0.01). Moreover, alcohol demand indicators (particularly the rate of change in elasticity of the demand curve, as measured by α, and the maximum expenditure, O max ) and proportionate alcohol-related reinforcement significantly forecasted changes in HDD at all time points (|βs| = 0.063-0.103, Ps < 0.05) in cross-lagged relationships, with bidirectional associations noted for the rate of change in elasticity (βs = -0.085 to -0.104, Ps < 0.01). Proportionate alcohol-related reinforcement also significantly forecasted changes in alcohol problems at all time points (βs = 0.072-0.112, Ps < 0.01).
Conclusions: Multiple behavioral economic indicators (demand elasticity, maximum expenditure and reinforcement ratio) forecast changes in heavy episodic drinking and alcohol problems over the course of emerging adulthood. These results further implicate alcohol demand and proportionate alcohol-related reinforcement as etiologically and developmentally important mechanisms in alcohol use trajectories.
(© 2024 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.)
References: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2022. 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr-2022&#95;booklet-1.html.
Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.
Health Canada. Canadian Tobacco Alcohol and Drugs (CTADS) Survey: 2017 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canadian-alcohol-drugs-survey/2017-summary.html.
SAMHSA. Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/.
CDC. Alcohol and public health: alcohol‐related disease impact (ARDI). [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 25]. Available from: https://nccd.cdc.gov/DPH&#95;ARDI/default/default.aspx.
Hingson RW, Zha W, White AM. Drinking beyond the binge threshold: predictors, consequences, and changes in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(6):717–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.014.
Jennison KM. The short‐term effects and unintended long‐term consequences of binge drinking in college: a 10‐year follow‐up study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2004;30(3):659–684.
White A, Hingson R. The burden of alcohol use. Alcohol Res Curr Rev. 2014;35(2):201–218.
Lee MR, Chassin L, Villalta IK. Maturing out of alcohol involvement: transitions in latent drinking statuses from late adolescence to adulthood. Dev Psychopathol. 2013;25(4pt1):1137–1153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000424.
Lee MR, Sher KJ. “Maturing out” of binge and problem drinking. Alcohol Res Curr Rev. 2018;39(1):31–42.
Maggs JL, Schulenberg JE. Trajectories of alcohol use during the transition to adulthood. Alcohol Res Health. 2004;28(4):195–201.
Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: what is it, and what is it good for? Child Dev Perspect. 2007;1(2):68–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x.
Murphy JG, Dennhardt AA. The behavioral economics of young adult substance abuse. Prev Med. 2016;92:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.022.
Bickel WK, Johnson MW, Koffarnus MN, MacKillop J, Murphy JG. The behavioral economics of substance use disorders: reinforcement pathologies and their repair. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10(1):641–677. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153724.
MacKillop J. The behavioral economics and neuroeconomics of alcohol use disorders. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40(4):672–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13004.
Gray JC, MacKillop J. Using behavior economics to understand alcohol use disorders: a concise review and identification of research priorities. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2(1):68–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0045-z.
Higgins ST, Heil SH, Lussier JP. Clinical implications of reinforcement as a determinant of substance use disorders. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55(1):431–461. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142033.
Acuff SF, Dennhardt AA, Correia CJ, Murphy JG. Measurement of substance‐free reinforcement in addiction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019;1(70):79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.04.003.
Hogarth L, Field M. Relative expected value of drugs versus competing rewards underpins vulnerability to and recovery from addiction. Behav Brain Res. 2020;15(394):112815.
Kaplan BA, Foster RNS, Reed DD, Amlung M, Murphy JG, MacKillop J. Understanding alcohol motivation using the alcohol purchase task: a methodological systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;(191):117–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.029.
Hursh SR, Roma PG. Behavioral economics and the analysis of consumption and choice. Manag Decis Econ. 2016;37(4–5):224–238.
Gilroy SP, Kaplan BA, Reed DD. Interpretation(s) of elasticity in operant demand. J Exp Anal Behav. 2020;114(1):106–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.610.
Murphy JG, Correia CJ, Barnett NP. Behavioral economic approaches to reduce college student drinking. Addict Behav. 2007;32(11):2573–2585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.015.
Acuff SF, Soltis KE, Dennhardt AA, Berlin KS, Murphy JG. Evaluating behavioral economic models of heavy drinking among college students. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42(7):1304–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13774.
Bertholet N, Murphy JG, Daeppen JB, Gmel G, Gaume J. The alcohol purchase task in young men from the general population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;1(146):39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.10.024.
Lemley SM, Kaplan BA, Reed DD, Darden AC, Jarmolowicz DP. Reinforcer pathologies: predicting alcohol related problems in college drinking men and women. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;1(167):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.07.025.
MacKillop J, O'Hagen S, Lisman SA, Murphy JG, Ray LA, Tidey JW, et al. Behavioral economic analysis of cue‐elicited craving for alcohol. Addiction. 2010;105(9):1599–1607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03004.x.
Murphy JG, MacKillop J. Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006;14(2):219–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.14.2.219.
Skidmore JR, Murphy JG, Martens MP. Behavioral economic measures of alcohol reward value as problem severity indicators in college students. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014;22(3):198–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036490.
Tucker JA, Lindstrom K, Chandler SD, Bacon JP, Cheong J. Behavioral economic indicators of risky drinking among community‐dwelling emerging adults. J Soc Psychol Addict Behav. 2021;35(4):415–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000686.
Yurasek AM, Murphy JG, Dennhardt AA, Skidmore JR, Buscemi J, McCausland C, et al. Drinking motives mediate the relationship between reinforcing efficacy and alcohol consumption and problems. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011;72(6):991–999. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2011.72.991.
Martínez‐Loredo V, González‐Roz A, Secades‐Villa R, Fernández‐Hermida JR, MacKillop J. Concurrent validity of the Alcohol Purchase Task for measuring the reinforcing efficacy of alcohol: an updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Addiction. 2021;116(10):2635–2650. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15379.
Acuff SF, MacKillop J, Murphy JG. A contextualized reinforcer pathology approach to addiction. Nat Rev Psychol. 2023;2(5):309–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00167-y.
Murphy JG, Correia CJ, Colby SM, Vuchinich RE. Using behavioral theories of choice to predict drinking outcomes following a brief intervention. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005;13(2):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.13.2.93.
Murphy JG, Barnett NP, Colby SM. Alcohol‐related and alcohol‐free activity participation and enjoyment among college students: a behavioral theories of choice analysis. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006;14(3):339–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.14.3.339.
Murphy JG, MacKillop J, Skidmore JR, Pederson AA. Reliability and validity of a demand curve measure of alcohol reinforcement. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;17(6):396–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017684.
Strickland JC, Alcorn JL, Stoops WW. Using behavioral economic variables to predict future alcohol use in a crowdsourced sample. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf). 2019;33(7):779–790.
Voss AT, Soltis K, Dennhardt AA, Martens MP, Murphy JG. Protective behavioral strategies mediate the relationship between behavioral economic risk factors and alcohol‐related problems. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018;26(1):58–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000169.
Copeland A, Stafford T, Acuff SF, Murphy JG, Field M. Behavioral economic and value‐based decision‐making constructs that discriminate current heavy drinkers versus people who reduced their drinking without treatment. J Soc Psychol Addict Behav. 2023;37(1):132–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000873.
Delmée L, Roozen HG, Steenhuis I. The engagement of non‐substance‐related pleasant activities is associated with decreased levels of alcohol consumption in university students. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2018;16(5):1261–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9857-5.
Gaume J, Murphy JG, Studer J, Daeppen JB, Gmel G, Bertholet N. Behavioral economics indices predict alcohol use and consequences in young men at 4‐year follow‐up. Addict Abingdon Engl. 2022;117(11):2816–2825. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15986.
Cassidy RN, Bernstein MH, Magill M, MacKillop J, Murphy JG, Colby SM. Alcohol demand moderates brief motivational intervention outcomes in underage young adult drinkers. Addict Behav. 2019;98:106044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106044.
Dennhardt AA, Yurasek AM, Murphy JG. Change in delay discounting and substance reward value following a brief alcohol and drug use intervention. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015;103(1):125–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.121.
Gex KS, Acuff SF, Campbell KW, Mun EY, Dennhardt AA, Borsari B, et al. Change in alcohol demand following a brief intervention predicts change in alcohol use: a latent growth curve analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022;46(8):1525–1538. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14887.
MacKillop J, Murphy JG. A behavioral economic measure of demand for alcohol predicts brief intervention outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;89(2):227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.01.002.
Murphy JG, Dennhardt AA, Yurasek AM, Skidmore JR, Martens MP, MacKillop J, et al. Behavioral economic predictors of brief alcohol intervention outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83(6):1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000032.
Murphy JG, Dennhardt AA, Martens MP, Borsari B, Witkiewitz K, Meshesha LZ. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a brief alcohol intervention supplemented with a substance‐free activity session or relaxation training. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019;87(7):657–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000412.
Cheong J, Rung JM, Tucker JA. Bidirectional prospective associations between behavioral economic indicators and drinking patterns during alcohol use disorder natural recovery attempts. J Soc Psychol Addict Behav. 2023;37(1):104–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000859.
Acuff SF, Belisario K, Dennhardt A, Amlung M, Tucker JA, MacKillop J, et al. Applying behavioral economics to understand changes in alcohol outcomes during the transition to adulthood: longitudinal relations and differences by sex and race. Psychol Addict Behav. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000943.
Butt P, Beirness D, Gliksman L, Paradis C, Stockwell T. Alcohol and health in Canada: a summary of evidence and guidelines for low‐risk drinking Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 2011.
Schlienz NJ, Lee DC. Co‐use of cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol during adolescence: policy and regulatory implications. Int Rev Psychiatry Abingdon Engl. 2018;30(3):226–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2018.1465399.
Yurasek AM, Aston ER, Metrik J. Co‐use of alcohol and cannabis: a review. Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4(2):184–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-017-0149-8.
Collins RL, Parks GA, Marlatt GA. Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self‐administration of alcohol. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985;53(2):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.2.189.
Kahler CW, Strong DR, Read JP. Toward efficient and comprehensive measurement of the alcohol problems continuum in college students: the brief young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29(7):1180–1189. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ALC.0000171940.95813.A5.
Meshesha LZ, Soltis KE, Wise EA, Rohsenow DJ, Witkiewitz K, Murphy JG. Pilot trial investigating a brief behavioral economic intervention as an adjunctive treatment for alcohol use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020;113:108002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108002.
Belisario K, Goodman B, Minhas M, MacKillop J. The systematic cleaning and processing of purchase task data: an R statistical package [Internet] Zenodo; 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 25]. Available from: https://zenodo.org/record/5935353.
Stein JS, Koffarnus MN, Snider SE, Quisenberry AJ, Bickel WK. Identification and management of nonsystematic purchase task data: toward best practice. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;23(5):377–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000020.
Koffarnus MN, Franck CT, Stein JS, Bickel WK. A modified exponential behavioral economic demand model to better describe consumption data. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;23(6):504–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000045.
Hamaker EL, Kuiper RM, Grasman RPPP. A critique of the cross‐lagged panel model. Psychol Methods. 2015;20(1):102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889.
Mulder JD, Hamaker EL. Three extensions of the random intercept cross‐lagged panel model. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2021;28(4):638–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1784738.
Usami S, Murayama K, Hamaker EL. A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations. Psychol Methods. 2019;24(5):637–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000210.
Littlefield AK, King KM, Acuff SF, Foster KT, Murphy JG, Witkiewitz K. Limitations of cross‐lagged panel models in addiction research and alternative models: an empirical example using project MATCH. J Soc Psychol Addict Behav. 2022;36(3):271–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000750.
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide (1998‐2017) 8th ed. Los Angeles: CA. Muthén & Muthén; 2017.
Hallquist MN, Wiley JF. MplusAutomation: an R package for facilitating large‐scale latent variable analyses in Mplus. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2018;25(4):621–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1402334.
Mann FD. Satorra‐Bentler scaled chi‐squared difference test [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SBSDiff/SBSDiff.pdf.
Orth U, Meier LL, Bühler JL, Dapp LC, Krauss S, Messerli D, et al. Effect size guidelines for cross‐lagged effects. Psychol Methods. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000499.
Hunter SB, Han B, Slaughter ME, Godley SH, Garner BR. Predicting evidence‐based treatment sustainment: results from a longitudinal study of the Adolescent‐Community Reinforcement Approach. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0606-8.
McKay JR. Making the hard work of recovery more attractive for those with substance use disorders. Addict Abingdon Engl. 2017;112(5):751–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13502.
Murphy JG, Dennhardt AA, Skidmore JR, Borsari B, Barnett NP, Colby SM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80(5):876–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028763.
Petry NM, Alessi SM, Olmstead TA, Rash CJ, Zajac K. Contingency management treatment for substance use disorders: how far has it come, and where does it need to go? J Soc Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(8):897–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000287.
معلومات مُعتمدة: PJT 148703 Canada CIHR; MFE 181842 Canada CIHR; Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research at McMaster University and St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton; Peter Boris Chair in Addictions Research; CRC-2020-00170 Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Translational Addiction Research
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Alcohol Purchase Task; alcohol use; alternative reinforcement; behavioral economics; reinforcer pathology; substance use; temporal
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240220 Date Completed: 20240506 Latest Revision: 20240626
رمز التحديث: 20240626
DOI: 10.1111/add.16443
PMID: 38374803
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1360-0443
DOI:10.1111/add.16443