دورية أكاديمية
Reliability between the two-colour chewing gum and the gummy-jelly tests used for the assessment of masticatory performance.
| العنوان: | Reliability between the two-colour chewing gum and the gummy-jelly tests used for the assessment of masticatory performance. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Nrecaj A; Clinic of General-, Special Care- and Geriatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland., Takeshita L; Clinic of General-, Special Care- and Geriatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland., Moreira YM; School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil., Schimmel M; Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland., Leles CR; Clinic of General-, Special Care- and Geriatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.; School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil.; Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland., Srinivasan M; Clinic of General-, Special Care- and Geriatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. |
| المصدر: | Journal of oral rehabilitation [J Oral Rehabil] 2024 Jun; Vol. 51 (6), pp. 954-961. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Feb 20. |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Blackwell Scientific Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0433604 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1365-2842 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0305182X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Oral Rehabil Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications. |
| مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Chewing Gum* , Mastication*/physiology , Healthy Volunteers*, Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Adult ; Female ; Male ; Color ; Young Adult |
| مستخلص: | Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of two methods used to assess masticatory performance and attempt to correlate them to achieve interchangeability between the methods. Methods: Twelve healthy dentate volunteers (men = 6, women = 6; mean age = 28.3 ± 4.1) with no known dental or medical pathologies were requested to participate in this study. Each participant completed three masticatory performance assessments, including two two-colour mixing-ability tests using chewing-gums (CG: gum#1 and gum#2) and the gummy-jelly (GJ) test. For each method, participants created five samples each (total = 15 measurements per participant, gum#1 = 5, gum#2 = 5, GJ = 5). For the gum#1 and gum#2 methods, the predetermined chewing cycles were fixed at 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 cycles, and for the GJ method, the time duration was fixed at 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 s. The parameter measures were submitted to Z-score transformation, and Bland-Altman plots were generated to graphically compare the differences between two techniques against their means. Additionally, mountain plot was used to assess the cumulative distribution of measurement error between the methods. Results: A total of 180 measurements were recorded. There were significant correlations between the number of chewing cycles/chewing time and masticatory performance using the gum#1 (r = -.753; p < .001), gum#2 (r = -.838; p < .001) and GJ (r = .730). When all tests were considered together for each method, significant correlations were found (p < .001). A descriptive range of mean values aiming to produce reference value ranges for predictive purposes was achieved considering the interchangeably among the methods [CG = GJ (VoH-mg = dL): 10 cycle = 10 s: 0.329 = 110; 15 cycles = 15 s: 0.177 = 164; 20 cycles = 20 s: 0.130 = 205; 25 cycles = 25 s: 0.086 = 200; 30 cycles = 30 s: 0.077 = 267]. Conclusion: The strong correlations and high consistency between the two masticatory performance methods found in this study conclude that the two assessment methods are reliable and interchangeable. Further evaluations are warranted to arrive at a conversion formula for translation of the results between the two methods. (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
| References: | Salazar S, Hori K, Uehara F, et al. Masticatory performance analysis using photographic image of gummy jelly. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(1):48‐54. Uesugi H, Shiga H. Relationship between masticatory performance using a gummy jelly and masticatory movement. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(4):419‐425. Komagamine Y, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S, Uchida T, Sasaki Y. Association between masticatory performance using a colour‐changeable chewing gum and jaw movement. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(8):555‐563. Schimmel M, Christou P, Herrmann FR, Müller F. A two‐colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency: development of different assessment methods. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(9):671‐678. Yoshida E, Fueki K, Igarashi Y. Association between food mixing ability and mandibular movements during chewing of a wax cube. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(11):791‐799. Murakami K, Hori K, Yoneda H, et al. Compatibility of two types of gummy jelly tests for detecting decreased masticatory function. Gerodontology. 2022;39(1):10‐16. Murakami K, Yoshimoto T, Hori K, et al. Masticatory performance test using a gummy jelly for older people with low masticatory ability. J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):593. Silva LC, Nogueira TE, Rios LF, Schimmel M, Leles CR. Reliability of a two‐colour chewing gum test to assess masticatory performance in complete denture wearers. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(4):301‐307. Imamura Y, Chebib N, Ohta M, et al. Masticatory performance in oral function assessment: alternative methods. J Oral Rehabil. 2023;50:383‐391. Ohta M, Imamura Y, Chebib N, et al. Oral function and nutritional status in non‐acute hospitalised elders. Gerodontology. 2022;39(1):74‐82. Buser R, Ziltener V, Samietz S, Fontolliet M, Nef T, Schimmel M. Validation of a purpose‐built chewing gum and smartphone application to evaluate chewing efficiency. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45(11):845‐853. Schimmel M, Christou P, Miyazaki H, Halazonetis D, Herrmann FR, Muller F. A novel colourimetric technique to assess chewing function using two‐coloured specimens: validation and application. J Dent. 2015;43(8):955‐964. Schimmel M, Rachais E, Husain NA, Muller F, Srinivasan M, Abou‐Ayash S. Assessing masticatory performance with a color mixing‐ability test using smartphone camera images. J Oral Rehabil. 2022;49:961‐969. Fankhauser N, Kalberer N, Muller F, Leles CR, Schimmel M, Srinivasan M. Comparison of smartphone‐camera and conventional flatbed scanner images for analytical evaluation of chewing function. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47(12):1496‐1502. Srinivasan M, Kalberer N, Fankhauser N, Naharro M, Maniewicz S, Muller F. CAD‐CAM complete removable dental prostheses: a double‐blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial evaluating milled and 3D‐printed dentures. J Dent. 2021;115:103842. Srinivasan M, Schimmel M, Buser R, Maniewicz S, Herrmann FR, Muller F. Mandibular two‐implant overdentures with CAD‐CAM milled bars with distal extensions or retentive anchors: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(12):1207‐1222. Halazonetis DJ, Schimmel M, Antonarakis GS, Christou P. Novel software for quantitative evaluation and graphical representation of masticatory efficiency. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(5):329‐335. Kosaka T, Ono T, Kida M, et al. A multifactorial model of masticatory performance: the Suita study. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(5):340‐347. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149‐1160. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175‐191. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(4):571‐582. Goncalves T, Schimmel M, van der Bilt A, et al. Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment. J Oral Rehabil. 2021;48(6):745‐761. Fan Y, Shu X, Leung KCM, Lo ECM. Association between masticatory performance and oral conditions in adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Dent. 2023;129:104395. Elgestad Stjernfeldt P, Sjogren P, Wardh I, Bostrom AM. Systematic review of measurement properties of methods for objectively assessing masticatory performance. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019;5(1):76‐104. Kugimiya Y, Watanabe Y, Shirobe M, et al. A comparison of colorimetric and visual methods for the assessment of masticatory performance with color‐changeable chewing gum in older persons. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(1):380‐388. Ikebe K, Morii K, Matsuda K‐I, Hazeyama T, Nokubi T. Reproducibility and accuracy in measuring masticatory performance using test gummy jelly. Prosthodont Res Prac. 2005;4(1):9‐15. |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Gluco‐sensor GS II; geriatric dentistry; gummy‐jelly method; masticatory performance; two‐colour mixing‐ability |
| المشرفين على المادة: | 0 (Chewing Gum) |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240221 Date Completed: 20240427 Latest Revision: 20240427 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240427 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/joor.13665 |
| PMID: | 38379391 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1365-2842 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1111/joor.13665 |