دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Development of an Abbreviated Model for Predicting Functional Movement Screen Score Within Tactical Populations.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Development of an Abbreviated Model for Predicting Functional Movement Screen Score Within Tactical Populations.
المؤلفون: Thompson MB; School of Kinesiology, Applied Health and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.; Tactical Fitness and Nutrition Lab, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma; and., Johnson QR; School of Kinesiology, Applied Health and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma., Lindsay KG; Department of Human Physiology and Nutrition, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado., Dawes JJ; School of Kinesiology, Applied Health and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.; Tactical Fitness and Nutrition Lab, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma; and.
المصدر: Journal of strength and conditioning research [J Strength Cond Res] 2024 Mar 01; Vol. 38 (3), pp. 607-611.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Human Kinetics Pub Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9415084 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1533-4287 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10648011 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Strength Cond Res Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics Pub., c1993-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Movement* , Posture*, Female ; Male ; Humans ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Law Enforcement ; Salaries and Fringe Benefits
مستخلص: Abstract: Thompson, MB, Johnson, QR, Lindsay, KG, and Dawes, JJ. Development of an abbreviated model for predicting functional movement screen score within tactical populations. J Strength Cond Res 38(3): 607-611, 2024-The Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is a tool commonly used to identify compensations when performing 7 specific movement patterns. Timely administration of the full FMS is largely dependent on the practitioner's familiarity and experience with the screening battery. When working in populations that are time-poor (i.e., tactical professionals), administration of the full movement pattern battery is not always feasible. The purpose of this study was to determine which, if any, combination of movement patterns that comprise the FMS could be used to predict total score on this screen among first responders. Functional Movement Screen scores for 99 male subjects (mean ± SD; age: 37.55 ± 9.83 years; height: 180.38 ± 6.59 cm; and body mass: 97.87 ± 15.32 kg) and 9 female subjects (age: 33.22 ± 3.99 years; height: 172.11 ± 8.19 cm; and body mass: 83.99 ± 14.09 kg) from a single law enforcement and fire agency were used for this analysis. Subjects performed the full FMS, which consisted of the following movement patterns: deep squat (DS), hurdle step (HS), in-line lunge (ILL), shoulder mobility (SM), active straight leg raise (ASLR), trunk stability push-up (PU), and rotary stability (RS). A stepwise regression was used to determine the best predictors of the FMS 7-pattern model based on the model's R2. Cronbach's alpha and Guttman's lambda-2 were used to determine the reliability of the proposed models. The regression indicated that a 4-pattern model consisting of DS, ILL, SM, and PU was sufficient to predict approximately 84% of the full model (adjusted R2 = 0.84, p ≤ 0.001). This 4-pattern model was shown to be reliable with the 7-pattern model (α = 0.93, λ = 0.93). Using this modified version of the FMS may allow practitioners working in tactical populations a time-efficient method of identifying dysfunctional movement and determine whether the full 7-pattern model of the FMS should be considered.
(Copyright © 2024 National Strength and Conditioning Association.)
References: Basar MJ, Stanek JM, Dodd DD, Begalle RL. The influence of corrective exercises on Functional Movement Screen and physical fitness performance in army ROTC cadets. J Sport Rehabil 28: 360–367, 2019.
Bock C, Orr RM. Use of the Functional Movement Screen in a tactical population: A review. J Mil Veterans Health 23: 33–42, 2015.
Bushman TT, Grier TL, Canham-Chervak M, et al. The Functional Movement Screen and injury risk: Association and predictive value in active men. Am J Sports Med 44: 297–304, 2016.
Cook G, Burton L. Movement: Functional Movement Systems: Screening—Assessment—Corrective Strategies. Aptos, CA: On Target Publications, 2010.
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-Part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 1: 62–72, 2006.
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-Part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 1: 132–139, 2006.
Dietze-Hermosa M, Montalvo S, Gonzalez MP, Dorgo S. Physical fitness in older adults: Is there a relationship with the modified Functional Movement Screen™? J Bodyw Mov Ther 25: 28–34, 2021.
Dietze-Hermosa MS, Montalvo S, Gonzalez MP, Dorgo S. Association between the modified Functional Movement Screen scores, fear of falling, and self-perceived balance in active older adults. Top Geriatr Rehabil 37: 64–73, 2021.
Dorrel BS, Long T, Shaffer S, Myer GD. Evaluation of the Functional Movement Screen as an injury prediction tool among active adult populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Health 7: 532–537, 2015.
Gribble PA, Brigle J, Pietrosimone BG, Pfile KR, Webster KA. Intrarater reliability of the Functional Movement Screen. J Strength Cond Res 27: 978–981, 2013.
Gross DL, Christopher GE, Faulk RT. Functional training program bridges rehabilitation and return to duty. J Spec Oper Med 9: 29–48, 2009.
Johnson QR, Scraper J, Lockie R, Orr RM, Dawes JJ. Sex-related differences in Functional Movement Screen scores among reserve officers' training corps cadets. Mil Med 188: e152–e157, 2023.
Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason Functional Movement Screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2: 147–158, 2007.
Lockie RG, Schultz AB, Callaghan SJ, et al. A preliminary investigation into the relationship between Functional Movement Screen scores and athletic physical performance in female team sport athletes. Biol Sport 32: 41–51, 2015.
Lockie RG, Schultz AB, Jordan CA, et al. Can selected Functional Movement Screen assessments be used to identify movement deficiencies that could affect multidirectional speed and jump performance? J Strength Cond Res 29: 195–205, 2015.
Orr RM, Lockie R, Milligan G, Lim C, Dawes J. Use of physical fitness assessments in tactical populations. Strength Cond J 44: 106–113, 2022.
Orr RM, Pope R, Stierli M, Hinton B. A Functional Movement Screen profile of an Australian state police force: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17: 1–7, 2016.
Reiman MP, Manske RC. Integration of functional testing into everyday practice. In: Functional Testing in Human Performance (Vol. 1). Human Kinetics, 2009. pp. 17–28.
Scudamore EM, Stevens SL, Fuller DK, Coons JM, Morgan DW. Functional Movement Screen items predict dynamic balance under military torso load. Mil Med 185: 493–498, 2020.
Shore E, Dally M, Brooks S, et al. Functional Movement Screen as a predictor of occupational injury among Denver firefighters. Saf Health Work 11: 301–306, 2020.
Stanek JM, Dodd DJ, Kelly AR, Wolfe AM, Swenson RA. Active duty firefighters can improve Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores following an 8-week individualized client workout program. Work 56: 213–220, 2017.
Teyhen DS, Shaffer SW, Lorenson CL, et al. The Functional Movement Screen: A reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 42: 530–540, 2012.
Wiese BW, Boone JK, Mattacola CG, McKeon PO, Uhl TL. Determination of the Functional Movement Screen to predict musculoskeletal injury in intercollegiate athletics. Athl Train Sports Health Care 6: 161–169, 2014.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240228 Date Completed: 20240229 Latest Revision: 20240229
رمز التحديث: 20240229
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004701
PMID: 38416446
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000004701