دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

VISUAL OUTCOMES AFTER INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS FLAP IN THE CLOSURE OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: VISUAL OUTCOMES AFTER INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS FLAP IN THE CLOSURE OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES.
المؤلفون: Suarez MK; Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and., Wang SK; Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and., Hayes B; Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and., Greven MA; Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and., Shah RE; Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and., Greven C; Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and., Russell G; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina., Ong SS; Department of Ophthalmology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and.
المصدر: Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) [Retina] 2024 Jul 01; Vol. 44 (7), pp. 1171-1179.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Comparative Study
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8309919 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1539-2864 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0275004X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Retina Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: Philadelphia : Lippincott, [1981?-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Retinal Perforations*/surgery , Retinal Perforations*/physiopathology , Visual Acuity*/physiology , Vitrectomy*/methods , Surgical Flaps* , Basement Membrane*/surgery , Endotamponade*/methods , Tomography, Optical Coherence*, Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Male ; Female ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Follow-Up Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Epiretinal Membrane/surgery ; Epiretinal Membrane/physiopathology
مستخلص: Purpose: To examine postoperative outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling (ILMP) versus flap (ILMF) in the closure of full-thickness macular holes.
Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade with ILMP or ILMF to close full-thickness macular hole at the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist from January 2012 to October 2022 with at least 3 months follow-up. Main outcome measures were type 1 primary full-thickness macular hole closure and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity in mean logMAR.
Results: One hundred thirty and 30 eyes underwent ILMP and ILMF, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Ninety-six percent of ILMP eyes and 90% of ILMF eyes achieved primary hole closure ( P = 0.29). Among all eyes with primary hole closure, best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year was not different between the groups, but when stratified by lens status, it was superior in the ILMP versus ILMF group in pseudophakic eyes: the estimated least-squares mean best-corrected visual acuity (Snellen equivalent) (95% confidence interval) was 0.42 (20/50) (0.34, 0.49) in the ILMP group and 0.71 (20/100) (0.50, 0.92) in the ILMF group.
Conclusion: Internal limiting membrane peeling and ILMF techniques yielded similarly high full-thickness macular hole closure rates. In pseudophakic eyes with primary hole closure, ILMF eyes had worse best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year.
References: Ali FS, Stein JD, Blachley TS, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for developing idiopathic macular hole among a diverse group of patients throughout the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017;135:299–305.
Abdul-Kadir MA, Lim LT. Update on surgical management of complex macular holes: a review. Int J Retina Vitreous 2021;7:75.
Shah SP, Manjunath V, Rogers AH, et al. Optical coherence tomography-guided facedown positioning for macular hole surgery. Retina 2013;33:356–362.
Rahman R, Sarfraz MW, El-Wardani M. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap vs complete internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes in nonposturing surgery. J Vitreoretin Dis 2022;6:9–13.
Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Adelman RA, Nawrocki J. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology 2010;117:2018–2025.
Morizane Y, Shiraga F, Kimura S, et al. Autologous transplantation of the internal limiting membrane for refractory macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:861–869.
Shen Y, Lin X, Zhang L, Wu M. Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 2020;20:14.
Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:654–659.
Freeman WR, Azen SP, Kim JW, et al. Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes. Results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. The Vitrectomy for Treatment of Macular Hole Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:11–21.
Ezra E, Gregor ZJ, Morfields Macular Hole Study Group Report No. 1. Surgery for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing natural history, vitrectomy, and vitrectomy plus autologous serum: Morfields Macular Hole Study Group Report no. 1. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:224–236.
Beutel J, Dahmen G, Ziegler A, Hoerauf H. Internal limiting membrane peeling with indocyanine green or trypan blue in macular hole surgery: a randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:326–332.
Scott RA, Ezra E, West JF, Gregor ZJ. Visual and anatomical results of surgery for long standing macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:150–153.
Stec LA, Ross RD, Williams GA, et al. Vitrectomy for chronic macular holes. Retina 2004;24:341–347.
Rizzo S, Tartaro R, Barca F, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap technique for treatment of full-thickness macular holes: a comparative study in a large series of patients. Retina 2018;38:S73–S78.
Ch'ng SW, Patton N, Ahmed M, et al. The Manchester large macular hole study: is it time to reclassify large macular holes? Am J Ophthalmol 2018;195:36–42.
Baumann C, Dervenis N, Kirchmair K, et al. Functional and morphological outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique in small-sized and medium-sized macular holes <400 µm. Retina 2021;41:2073–2078.
Chou HD, Liu L, Wang CT, et al. Single-layer inverted internal limiting membrane flap versus conventional peel for small- or medium-sized full-thickness macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol 2022;235:111–119.
Narayanan R, Singh SR, Taylor S, et al. Surgical outcomes after inverted internal limiting membrane flap versus conventional peeling for very large macular holes. Retina 2019;39:1465–1469.
Ramtohul P, Parrat E, Denis D, Lorenzi U. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study. BMC Ophthalmol 2020;20:11.
Shiode Y, Morizane Y, Matoba R, et al. The role of inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole closure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:4847–4855.
Chen Y, Wang J, Ye X, et al. The role of internal limiting membrane flap for highly myopic macular hole retinal detachment: improving the closure rate but leading to excessive gliosis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:812693.
Benson WE, Cruickshanks KC, Fong DS, et al. Surgical management of macular holes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1328–1335.
Kim JW, Freeman WR, Azen SP, et al. Prospective randomized trial of vitrectomy or observation for stage 2 macular holes. Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;121:605–614.
Yamada K, Oishi A, Kusano M, et al. Effect of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique on small-medium size macular holes. Sci Rep 2022;12:731.
Cacciamani A, Gelso A, Di Nicola M, et al. Inverted ILM-flap techniques variants for macular hole surgery: randomized clinical trial to compare retinal sensitivity and fixation stability. Sci Rep 2020;10:15832.
Casini G, Mura M, Figus M, et al. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole surgery without extra manipulation of the flap. Retina 2017;37:2138–2144.
Iwasaki M, Kinoshita T, Miyamoto H, Imaizumi H. Influence of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique on the outer retinal layer structures after a large macular hole surgery. Retina 2019;39:1470–1477.
Gandorfer A, Haritoglou C, Kampik A. Toxicity of indocyanine green in vitreoretinal surgery. Dev Ophthalmol 2008;42:69–81.
Wang XW, Long Y, Gu YS, Guo DY. Outcomes of 4 surgical adjuvants used for internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol 2020;13:481–487.
Markan A, Chawla R, Gupta V, et al. Photoreceptor evaluation after successful macular hole closure: an adaptive optics study. Ther Adv Ophthalmol 2019;11:2515841419868132.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240304 Date Completed: 20240620 Latest Revision: 20240620
رمز التحديث: 20240621
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004084
PMID: 38437847
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1539-2864
DOI:10.1097/IAE.0000000000004084