دورية أكاديمية
Clinical and thermographic evaluation after lower third molar extractions and the application of different photobiomodulation protocols: double-blind randomised clinical trial.
العنوان: | Clinical and thermographic evaluation after lower third molar extractions and the application of different photobiomodulation protocols: double-blind randomised clinical trial. |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | de Paula LM; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Av. Universitaria, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiania, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil., de Andrade Fernandes AC; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Av. Universitaria, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiania, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil., Evangelista BC; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Av. Universitaria, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiania, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil., do Couto Lima-Moreira F; Department of Special Care, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil., Andrade G; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Av. Universitaria, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiania, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil., de Andrade Fernandes JV; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Av. Universitaria, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiania, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil., de Castro FLA; Paulista State University of Mesquita Filho - UNESP, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil., Roriz VM; Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Av. Universitaria, s/n, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiania, Goiás, 74605-020, Brazil. vmroriz@hotmail.com. |
المصدر: | Clinical oral investigations [Clin Oral Investig] 2024 Mar 08; Vol. 28 (3), pp. 203. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 08. |
نوع المنشور: | Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial |
اللغة: | English |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Springer-Verlag Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9707115 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1436-3771 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14326981 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Oral Investig |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: Berlin : Springer-Verlag Original Publication: Berlin : Springer, c1997- |
مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Low-Level Light Therapy*/methods , Molar, Third*/surgery, Humans ; Edema ; Pain ; Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy ; Tooth Extraction |
مستخلص: | Objectives: to compare the parameters of pain, oedema, temperature, and soft tissue closure in dental sockets that received two different photobiomodulation (PBM) protocols following extractions. Materials and Methods: Thirty-one participants had their teeth 38 and 48 extracted. Subsequently, one of the dental sockets received PBM at a wavelength (WL) of 808 nanometers (808 group- nm) and the other dental socket received the PBM at WLs of 808 nm and 660 nm, simultaneously (808 + 660 group). The PBM was applied immediately after the surgical procedure and on the 3rd and 7th days. Results: The mean of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values for pain were 1.45 for the 3rd day and 0.52 for the 7th day in the 808 + 660 and 808 group, respectively. The mean the pogonion-tragus measurement, used to assess facial oedema on the 3rd day, was 15.38 cm (range 13.5-17.5) in the 808 + 660 group and 15.48 cm (range 14.0-17.5) in the 808 group. The mean facial temperatures in the 808 + 660 group were 34.9 degrees Celsius (ºC) (range 33.5-36.4) on the 3rd day and 35 ºC (range 33.4-36.4) on the 7th day. In the 808 group, the mean temperatures were 34.9 ºC (range 33.9-36.2) on the 3rd day and 34.9 ºC (33.7-36.2) on the 7th day. Regarding the dimensions of the dental socket, the mean were similar for both groups. Significant differences between the groups were only observed in the pain parameter and only on the 7th day, being greater for the 808 + 660 group (p = 0.031). Conclusions: The association of the 660 nm with 808 nm, and the increase in energy did not showed more benefits in pain reduction oedema, or acceleration of the closure of the soft tissues of the dental sockets of lower third molars, in the protocols used here. Clinical Relevance: There is no need to combine lasers at wavelengths of 660 and 808 nm to reduce oedema, pain and repair of soft tissues after extraction of lower third molars. Clinical Trial Registration: This trial was registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) with the following code: RBR-66pyrh8, on 29th December, 2022. (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.) |
References: | Sigaroodi A, Motevasseli S, Maleki D et al (2023) Low-level laser and management of common complications after the mandibular third molar surgery: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 20:14–24. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.367913. (PMID: 10.4103/1735-3327.36791336820144) Thorat S, Nilesh K (2022) Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of postoperative surgical sequelae after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 13:S52–S56. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_52_20. (PMID: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_52_20363939489651229) Domah F, Shah R, Nurmatov UB, Tagiyeva N (2021) The use of low-level laser therapy to reduce postoperative morbidity after third molar surgery: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 79(2):313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.018. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.09.018) Cetira Filho EL, Silva PGB, Wong DVT et al (2022) Effect of preemptive photobiomodulation associated with nimesulide on the postsurgical outcomes, oxidative stress, and quality of life after third molar surgery: a randomized, split-mouth, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 26:6941–6960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04649-w. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-022-04649-w359486999365445) Tanan Karaca G, Duygu G, Er N, Ozgun E (2023) Comparative investigation of anti-inflammatory effect of platelet-rich fibrin after mandibular wisdom tooth surgery: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Med 12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134250. (PMID: 10.3390/jcm12134250) Mohajerani H, Tabeie F, Alirezaei A, Keyvani G, Bemanali M (2021) Does combined low-level laser and light-emitting Diode Light Irradiation Reduce Pain, Swelling, and Trismus after Surgical extraction of Mandibular Third molars? A Randomized double-blinded crossover study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 79(8):1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.07.017. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.07.01732780994) Momeni E, Kazemi F, Sanaei-rad P (2022) Extraoral low-level laser therapy can decrease pain but not edema and trismus after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 22:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02461-2. (PMID: 10.1186/s12903-022-02461-2) Chugh A, Singh S, Mittal Y, Chugh V (2018) Submucosal injection of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone for the control of postoperative sequelae after third molar surgery: randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(2):228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.009. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.00928811076) Ahrari F, Eshghpour M, Zare R et al (2020) Effectiveness of low-level laser irradiation in reducing pain and accelerating socket healing after undisturbed tooth extraction. J Lasers Med Sci 11(3):274–279. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.46. (PMID: 10.34172/jlms.2020.46328022877369554) Hamblin MR (2017) Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophys 4:337–361. https://doi.org/10.3934/biophy.2017.3.337. (PMID: 10.3934/biophy.2017.3.337287482175523874) Duarte de Oliveira FJ, Brasil GMLC, Araújo Soares GP et al (2021) Use of low-level laser therapy to reduce postoperative pain, edema, and trismus following third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 49(11):1088–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2021.06.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.06.006) Koparal M, Kucuk AO, Alan H, Asutay F, Avci M (2018) Effects of low-level laser therapy following surgical extraction of the lower third molar with objective measurement of swelling using a three-dimensional system. Exp Ther Med 15(4):3820–3826. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.5921. (PMID: 10.3892/etm.2018.5921295817405863601) Ferreira G, Prado L, Santos K et al (2022) Efficacy of two low-level laser therapy protocols following lower third molar surgery – a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Acta Odontológica Latinoam 35:31–38. https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/1/31. (PMID: 10.54589/aol.35/1/31) Santos PL, Marotto AP, Zatta da Silva T et al (2020) Is low-level laser therapy effective for Pain Control after the Surgical removal of Unerupted Third molars? A Randomized Trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 78(2):184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.08.029. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.08.02931604060) Dalirsani Z, Ghazi N, Delavarian Z et al (2021) Effects of diode low-level laser therapy on healing of tooth extraction sockets: a histopathological study in diabetic rats. Lasers Med Sci 36(7):1527–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03270-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s10103-021-03270-933644838) Das AR, Vidya KC, Srikar MV et al (2022) Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomized clinical trial. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 13:60–66. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_297_21. (PMID: 10.4103/njms.njms_297_21359118099326211) Pedreira AA, Wanderley FG, Sa MF, Viena CS, Perez A, Hoshi R, Leite MP, Reis SR, Medrado AP (2016) Thermographic and clinical evaluation of 808-nm laser photobiomodulation effects after third molar extraction. Minerva Stomatol 65(4):213–222. (PMID: 27374361) Petrini M, Ferrante M, Trentini P et al (2017) Effect of pre-operatory low-level laser therapy on pain, swelling, and trismus associated with third-molar surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 22(4):e467–e472. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21398. (PMID: 10.4317/medoral.21398285783685549519) Raiesian S, Khani M, Khiabani K et al (2017) Assessment of low-level laser therapy effects after extraction of impacted lower third molar surgery. J Lasers Med Sci 8:42–45. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2017.08. (PMID: 10.15171/jlms.2017.08289129435420364) Kolosovas-Machuca ES, Martínez-Jiménez MA, Ramírez-Garcíaluna JL et al (2016) Pain measurement through temperature changes in children undergoing dental extractions. Pain Res Manag 2016:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4372617. (PMID: 10.1155/2016/4372617) Neubauer-Geryk J, Hoffmann M, Wielicka M et al (2019) Current methods for the assessment of skin microcirculation: part 2. Postep Dermatologii i Alergol 36(4):377–381. https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2019.83657. (PMID: 10.5114/ada.2019.83657) Wziątek-Kuczmik D, Niedzielska I, Mrowiec A et al (2022) Is Thermal Imaging a Helpful Tool in diagnosis of asymptomatic odontogenic infection Foci—A Pilot Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(23):1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316325. (PMID: 10.3390/ijerph192316325) Christensen J, Matzen LH, Vaeth M et al (2012) Thermography as a quantitative imaging method for assessing postoperative inflammation. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 41(6):494–499. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/98447974. (PMID: 10.1259/dmfr/98447974) Kasprzyk-Kucewicz T, Cholewka A, Bałamut K et al (2021) The applications of infrared thermography in surgical removal of retained teeth effects assessment. J Therm Anal Calorim 144:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09457-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s10973-020-09457-6) De Carvalho GR, Rodrigues WN, Barboza JVM et al (2021) Infrared thermography in the evaluation of Dental Socket Healing after Photobiomodulation Therapy: a Case Report. J Lasers Med Sci 12:1–4. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2021.11. (PMID: 10.34172/jlms.2021.11) Dostalova T, Kroulikova V, Podzimek S, Jelinková H (2017) Low-level laser therapy after Wisdom Teeth surgery: evaluation of immunologic markers (secretory immunoglobulin A and lysozyme levels) and thermographic examination: Placebo Controlled Study. Photomed Laser Surg 35(11):616–621. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4214. (PMID: 10.1089/pho.2016.421428525303) Asutay F, Ozcan-Kucuk A, Alan H, Koparal M (2018) ThreeDimensional evaluation of the Effect of LowLevel Laser Therapy on facial swelling after lower third molar surgery: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled study. Niger J Clin Pract 21:1107–1113. (PMID: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_38_1830156193) Singh V, Garg A, Bhagol A et al (2019) Photobiomodulation alleviates postoperative discomfort after mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77(12):2412–2421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.009. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.00931323184) Pell GJ, Gregory BT (1933) Impacted mandibular third molars classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig 39:330–338. Winter GB (1926) American Medical Book Company. St. Louis, United States of America. American Society of Anesthesiologists (2020) ASA Physical Status Classification System. https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-practice-parameters/statement-on-asa-physical-status-classification-system . Acessed 02 August 2023. Amarillas-Escobar ED, Toranzo-Fernández JM, Martínez-Rider R et al (2010) Use of Therapeutic Laser after Surgical removal of impacted Lower Third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(2):319–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.037. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.03720116702) Hupp JR, Ellis E, Tucker MR (2021) Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Kahraman SA, Cetiner S, Strauss RA (2017) The effects of Transcutaneous and Intraoral Low-Level laser therapy after extraction of Lower Third molars: a randomized single blind, Placebo Controlled Dual-Center Study. Photomed Laser Surg 35(8):401–407. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4252. (PMID: 10.1089/pho.2016.425228294694) Feslihan E, Eroǧlu CN (2019) Can Photobiomodulation Therapy be an alternative to Methylprednisolone in reducing Pain, Swelling, and Trismus after removal of impacted third molars? Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine. Laser Surg 37(11):700–705. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4696. (PMID: 10.1089/photob.2019.4696) Isolan CP, Kinalski M, de de A, Leão OA A, et al (2021) Photobiomodulation therapy reduces postoperative pain after third molar extractions: a randomized clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral y Cir Bucal 26(3):e341–e348. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.24228. (PMID: 10.4317/medoral.24228) Sierra SO, Deana AM, Bussadori SK et al (2016) Choosing between intraoral or extraoral, red or infrared laser irradiation after impacted third molar extraction. Lasers Surg Med 48(5):511–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22488. (PMID: 10.1002/lsm.2248826868520) Da Silva TMV, Melo TS, de Alencar RC et al (2021) Photobiomodulation for mucosal repair in patients submitted to dental extraction after head and neck radiation therapy: a double-blind randomized pilot study. Support Care Cancer 29(3):1347–1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05608-5. (PMID: 10.1007/s00520-020-05608-532642953) Momeni E, Barati H, Arbabi MR et al (2021) Low-level laser therapy using laser diode 940 nm in the mandibular impacted third molar surgery: double-blind randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 21:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01434-1. (PMID: 10.1186/s12903-021-01434-1) De Barros DD, dos Santos Barros Catão JS, Ferreira ACD et al (2022) Low-level laser therapy is effective in controlling postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 37(5):2363–2377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03470-3. (PMID: 10.1007/s10103-021-03470-335013845) Merigo E, Vescovi P, Margalit M et al (2015) Efficacy of LLLT in swelling and pain control after the extraction of lower impacted third molars. Laser Ther 24:39–46. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.15-OR-05. (PMID: 10.5978/islsm.15-OR-05259414244416144) Sourvanos D, Lander B, Sarmiento H et al (2023) Photobiomodulation in dental extraction therapy: postsurgical pain reduction and wound healing. J Am Dent Assoc 154(7):567–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2023.03.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.03.0043720437610877507) Gururaj SB, Shankar SM, Parveen F, Chidambar CK, Bhushan K, Prabhudev CM (2022) Assessment of Healing and Pain Response at Mandibular third molar extraction sites with and without pre- and PostOperative Photobiomodulation at Red and Near-Infrared wavelengths: a clinical study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 14:S470–S474. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_675_21. (PMID: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_675_21361106619469217) Kocherova I, Bryja A, Błochowiak K, Kaczmarek M, Stefańska K, Matys J, Grzech-Leśniak K, Dominiak M, Mozdziak P, Kempisty B, Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M (2021) Photobiomodulation with Red and Near-Infrared Light improves viability and modulates expression of mesenchymal and apoptotic-related markers in human gingival fibroblasts. Mater (Basel) 14(21):3427–3440. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123427. (PMID: 10.3390/ma14123427) Sterczała B, Grzech-Leśniak K, Michel O, Trzeciakowski W, Dominiak M, Jurczyszyn K (2021) Assessment of Human Gingival Fibroblast Proliferation after Laser Stimulation in Vitro using different laser types and wavelengths (1064, 980, 635, 450, and 405 nm)-Preliminary Report. J Pers Med 11(2):98–115. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11020098. (PMID: 10.3390/jpm11020098335570387913795) Batinjan G, Zore Z, Čelebić A, Papić M, Gabrić Pandurić D, Filipović Zore I (2014) Thermographic monitoring of wound healing and oral health-related quality of life in patients treated with laser (aPDT) after impacted mandibular third molar removal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(12):1503–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.00325277807) |
فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Laser therapy; Oral surgery; Tooth socket; Wound healing |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240307 Date Completed: 20240311 Latest Revision: 20240425 |
رمز التحديث: | 20240425 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-024-05594-6 |
PMID: | 38453808 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
تدمد: | 1436-3771 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-024-05594-6 |