دورية أكاديمية
Identifying the top 10 research priorities for the school food system in the UK: a priority setting exercise.
العنوان: | Identifying the top 10 research priorities for the school food system in the UK: a priority setting exercise. |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Schliemann D; Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK., Spence S; Human Nutrition & Exercise Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK., O'Kane N; Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK., Chiang CC; Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK., Olgacher D; Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK., McKinley MC; Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK., Woodside JV; Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK j.woodside@qub.ac.uk. |
مؤلفون مشاركون: | GENIUS network |
المصدر: | BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2024 Mar 14; Vol. 14 (3), pp. e081400. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 14. |
نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
اللغة: | English |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101552874 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2044-6055 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20446055 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMJ Open Subsets: MEDLINE |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: [London] : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2011- |
مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Biomedical Research*, Child ; Humans ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Schools ; Parents ; United Kingdom ; Health Priorities |
مستخلص: | Introduction: The school food system varies widely between schools and across the UK. There is a need to understand evidence gaps in school food research to allow the development, implementation and evaluation of policies and interventions to support children's healthy eating at school. This study aimed to conduct a priority setting exercise to co-produce research priorities in relation to the UK school food system. Methods: The James Lind Alliance process informed this priority setting exercise; all key steps engaged a wide range of UK school food stakeholders (including teachers, parents, principals, school governors, policymakers, caterers). An initial online stakeholder survey identified perceived research priorities. In a second survey, stakeholders were asked to rank these priorities. Lastly, an online priority setting workshop with stakeholders elicited the most important research priorities. Results: In 2021, school food stakeholders (n=1280) completed the first survey, from which 136 research priorities were identified. In the second survey, participants (n=107) ranked these research priorities regarding their importance. Lastly, 30 workshop participants discussed and reached consensus on the research priorities. After final refinement by the research team, 18 priorities resulted, with the top 10 being related to the provision of free school meals (effectiveness of cost-effectiveness of different levels of eligibility, including universal provision), implementation of policy (including improving uptake) and food standards, issues around procurement, leadership, inequalities, social norms, the eating environment, food culture throughout the school setting and healthy eating. Conclusion: The top 10 research priorities were elicited through a rigorous approach, including a wide range of stakeholders across the UK. These should be considered by policymakers, researchers and others to inform research, evidence-based policy development and, ultimately, improve the UK school food system. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.) |
References: | Nat Metab. 2020 Mar;2(3):223-232. (PMID: 32694781) BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e038001. (PMID: 32883735) Nutrients. 2021 Nov 17;13(11):. (PMID: 34836368) Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun;16(6):1118-25. (PMID: 21899789) Postgrad Med J. 2015 Nov;91(1081):639-45. (PMID: 26338983) Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(8):2313-2317. (PMID: 33198839) Global Spine J. 2022 Feb;12(1_suppl):19S-27S. (PMID: 35174731) CMAJ. 2015 Oct 6;187(14):E429-E436. (PMID: 26261199) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 29;17(21):. (PMID: 33138030) Can J Public Health. 2020 Dec;111(6):1020-1023. (PMID: 32529554) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):. (PMID: 34501578) Nutr Bull. 2022 Jun;47(2):230-245. (PMID: 35942240) Public Health Nutr. 2007 Jul;10(7):652-62. (PMID: 17381913) BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 20;12(7):e058177. (PMID: 35858732) Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2020 May 7;16:351-378. (PMID: 32097572) |
معلومات مُعتمدة: | United Kingdom WT_ Wellcome Trust |
فهرسة مساهمة: | Investigator: D Schliemann; S Spence; N O'Kane; CC Chiang; D Olgacher; MC McKinley; JV Woodside Keywords: adolescent; nutrition & dietetics; schools |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240314 Date Completed: 20240318 Latest Revision: 20240318 |
رمز التحديث: | 20240318 |
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC10941135 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081400 |
PMID: | 38485482 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
تدمد: | 2044-6055 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081400 |