دورية أكاديمية
Comparison of bolus versus continuous thermodilution derived indices of microvascular dysfunction in revascularized coronary syndromes.
| العنوان: | Comparison of bolus versus continuous thermodilution derived indices of microvascular dysfunction in revascularized coronary syndromes. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Fawaz S; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom.; Department of Circulatory Health Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, United Kingdom., Marin F; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K., Khan SA; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom.; Department of Circulatory Health Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, United Kingdom., F G Simpson R; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom.; Department of Circulatory Health Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, United Kingdom., Kotronias RA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K., Chai J; Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K., Acute Myocardial Infarction OxAMI Study Investigators O; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K., Al-Janabi F; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom., Jagathesan R; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom., Konstantinou K; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom., Mohdnazri SR; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom., Clesham GJ; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom.; Department of Circulatory Health Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, United Kingdom., Tang KH; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom., Cook CM; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom.; Department of Circulatory Health Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, United Kingdom., Channon KM; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K., Banning AP; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K., Davies JR; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom.; Department of Circulatory Health Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, United Kingdom., Karamasis GV; Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece., De Maria GL; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K., Keeble TR; Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Hospitals Trust, Basildon, SS16 5NL, United Kingdom.; Department of Circulatory Health Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, United Kingdom. |
| المصدر: | International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature [Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc] 2024 Mar 08; Vol. 51, pp. 101374. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 08 (Print Publication: 2024). |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd Country of Publication: Ireland NLM ID: 101649525 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2352-9067 (Print) Linking ISSN: 23529067 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Shannon [Ireland] : Elsevier Ireland Ltd., [2014]- |
| مستخلص: | Background: The assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) using invasive methods is a field of growing interest, however the preferred method remains debated. Bolus and continuous thermodilution are commonly used methods, but weak agreement has been observed in patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). This study examined their agreement in revascularized acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) patients. Objective: To compare bolus thermodilution and continuous thermodilution indices of CMD in revascularized ACS and CCS patients and assess their diagnostic agreement at pre-defined cut-off points. Methods: Patients from two centers underwent paired bolus and continuous thermodilution assessments after revascularization. CMD indices were compared between the two methods and their agreements at binary cut-off points were assessed. Results: Ninety-six patients and 116 vessels were included. The mean age was 64 ± 11 years, and 20 (21 %) were female. Overall, weak correlations were observed between the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) and continuous thermodilution microvascular resistance (R Conclusions: There is a significant difference and weak agreement between bolus and continuous thermodilution-derived indices, which must be considered when diagnosing CMD in ACS and CCS patients. Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. (© 2024 The Author(s).) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Bolus; Continuous; Coronary; Microvascular; Thermodilution |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240318 Latest Revision: 20240508 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240509 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC10940925 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101374 |
| PMID: | 38496256 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text via ClinicalKey 
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 2352-9067 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101374 |