دورية أكاديمية

Development of a Medical Social Media Ethics Scale and Assessment of #IRad, #CardioTwitter, and #MedTwitter Posts: Mixed Methods Study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Development of a Medical Social Media Ethics Scale and Assessment of #IRad, #CardioTwitter, and #MedTwitter Posts: Mixed Methods Study.
المؤلفون: Mlambo VC; School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States., Keller E; Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, United States., Mussatto C; School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States., Hwang G; Division of Interventional Radiology, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, United States.
المصدر: JMIR infodemiology [JMIR Infodemiology] 2024 Mar 27; Vol. 4, pp. e47770. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Mar 27.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: JMIR Publications Country of Publication: Canada NLM ID: 9918249014806676 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2564-1891 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 25641891 NLM ISO Abbreviation: JMIR Infodemiology Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Toronto, ON, Canada : JMIR Publications, [2021]-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Social Media* , Medicine* , Mustelidae*, Humans ; Animals ; Ethics, Medical ; Professionalism ; Health Personnel
مستخلص: Background: Social media posts by clinicians are not bound by the same rules as peer-reviewed publications, raising ethical concerns that have not been extensively characterized or quantified.
Objective: We aim to develop a scale to assess ethical issues on medical social media (SoMe) and use it to determine the prevalence of these issues among posts with 3 different hashtags: #MedTwitter, #IRad, and #CardioTwitter.
Methods: A scale was developed based on previous descriptions of professionalism and validated via semistructured cognitive interviewing with a sample of 11 clinicians and trainees, interrater agreement, and correlation of 100 posts. The final scale assessed social media posts in 6 domains. This was used to analyze 1500 Twitter posts, 500 each from the 3 hashtags. Analysis of posts was limited to original Twitter posts in English made by health care professionals in North America. The prevalence of potential issues was determined using descriptive statistics and compared across hashtags using the Fisher exact and χ 2 tests with Yates correction.
Results: The final scale was considered reflective of potential ethical issues of SoMe by participants. There was good interrater agreement (Cohen κ=0.620, P<.01) and moderate to strong positive interrater correlation (=0.602, P<.001). The 6 scale domains showed minimal to no interrelation (Cronbach α=0.206). Ethical concerns across all hashtags had a prevalence of 1.5% or less except the conflict of interest concerns on #IRad, which had a prevalence of 3.6% (n=18). Compared to #MedTwitter, posts with specialty-specific hashtags had more patient privacy and conflict of interest concerns.
Conclusions: The SoMe professionalism scale we developed reliably reflects potential ethical issues. Ethical issues on SoMe are rare but important and vary in prevalence across medical communities.
(©Vongai Christine Mlambo, Eric Keller, Caroline Mussatto, Gloria Hwang. Originally published in JMIR Infodemiology (https://infodemiology.jmir.org), 27.03.2024.)
References: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jun;29(6):816-818. (PMID: 29798756)
Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):99-112. (PMID: 25038200)
Semin Hematol. 2017 Oct;54(4):198-204. (PMID: 29153081)
Med Educ. 2012 Mar;46(3):257-66. (PMID: 22324525)
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):620-7. (PMID: 23579867)
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(2):157-160. (PMID: 31769364)
Curr Dermatol Rep. 2021;10(4):120-127. (PMID: 34540357)
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Sep 24;14(5):e117. (PMID: 23006336)
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):1070-1074. (PMID: 32239244)
Semin Nephrol. 2020 May;40(3):249-263. (PMID: 32560773)
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;74(6):1783-1791.e1. (PMID: 34673169)
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2017 Jan 25;30(1):3. (PMID: 32025957)
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 1;22(9):e19746. (PMID: 32870160)
P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):491-520. (PMID: 25083128)
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 1;98(1):97-106. (PMID: 33686726)
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Feb 5;136(3):243-6. (PMID: 11827500)
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. (PMID: 29942800)
Neurology. 2021 Sep 21;97(12):585-594. (PMID: 34864637)
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1703-1704.e2. (PMID: 30502878)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Twitter; X; cardiology; conflict of interest; ethical issues; ethics; interventional radiology; medical social media; prevalence; privacy; professional; professionalism; social media
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240327 Date Completed: 20240328 Latest Revision: 20240604
رمز التحديث: 20240604
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11007602
DOI: 10.2196/47770
PMID: 38536206
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2564-1891
DOI:10.2196/47770