دورية أكاديمية

Factors associated with the progression of sagittal spinal deformity after total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Factors associated with the progression of sagittal spinal deformity after total hip arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
المؤلفون: Matsuyama J; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, 569-8686, Japan., Okamoto Y; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, 569-8686, Japan. yoshinori.okamoto@ompu.ac.jp.; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Ibaraki Hospital, 2-1-45, Mitsukeyama, Ibaraki, 567-0035, Japan. yoshinori.okamoto@ompu.ac.jp., Wakama H; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, 569-8686, Japan., Nakamura K; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, 569-8686, Japan., Saika T; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, 569-8686, Japan., Otsuki S; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, 569-8686, Japan., Neo M; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, 569-8686, Japan.
المصدر: International orthopaedics [Int Orthop] 2024 Aug; Vol. 48 (8), pp. 1953-1961. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 08.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Verlag Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 7705431 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-5195 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03412695 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int Orthop Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Berlin : Springer Verlag
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*/methods , Propensity Score* , Disease Progression*, Humans ; Female ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Case-Control Studies ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Spinal Curvatures/surgery ; Spinal Curvatures/epidemiology ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Adult
مستخلص: Purpose: The functional interaction between the hip and spine in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) is clinically significant, as it impacts post-operative outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to identify factors associated with the progression of sagittal spinal deformity and assess the association with patient-reported outcomes.
Methods: This retrospective case-control study included 200 patients who underwent primary THA and completed a mean follow-up duration of 42.2 months (range, 24.0-78.0). We employed a multivariate logistic regression to identify variables predictive of a post-THA sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥ 50 mm, which was indicative of a spinal sagittal imbalance. Propensity score-matched cohorts for age, sex, body mass index, follow-up duration, hip flexion contracture, developmental dysplasia, pelvic incidence (PI), and SVA were created, and the outcomes were compared between the two groups.
Results: PI (odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.86, p = 0.033) was associated with an SVA ≥ 50 mm. After successfully matching patients with (n = 50) and without (n = 50) an SVA ≥ 50 mm, the minimum clinically important difference showed significant differences between the 50 matched pairs (p = 0.016 for EuroQol-5D, p = 0.003 for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement, and p < 0.001 for low back pain).
Conclusion: PI is associated with the development of a positive sagittal spinal malalignment post-THA. This finding can assist surgeons in managing patient expectations and in optimising outcomes. Feasible strategies are warranted to minimise the risk of spinal deformity progression post-THA.
(© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.)
References: Sharma AK, Vigdorchik JM (2021) The hip-spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty: how to execute the plan. J Arthroplasty 36:S111–S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.008. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.00833526398)
Haffer H, Wang Z, Hu Z et al (2022) Does total hip arthroplasty affect spinopelvic and spinal alignment?: a prospective observational investigation. Clin Spine Surg 35:E627–E635. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001320. (PMID: 10.1097/BSD.000000000000132035351837)
Zagra L, Benazzo F, Dallari D et al (2022) Current concepts in hip-spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 7:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-21-0082. (PMID: 10.1530/EOR-21-0082350735138788146)
Vergari C, Kim Y, Takemoto M et al (2023) Sagittal alignment in patients with flexion contracture of the hip before and after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:3587–3596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04606-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s00402-022-04606-y36085380)
Zanirato A, Quarto E, Ursino C, et a (2023) Outcomes and complications of total hip arthroplasty in patients with a pre-existing pathologic spine-hip relation. A systematic review of the literature. [published online ahead of print]. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06067-3.
Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2024–2029. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96. (PMID: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.9616166889)
Ochi H, Homma Y, Baba T, Nojiri H, Matsumoto M, Kaneko K (2017) Sagittal spinopelvic alignment predicts hip function after total hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 52:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.12.010. (PMID: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.12.01028027530)
Okamoto Y, Wakama H, Matsuyama J et al (2023) Clinical significance of relative pelvic version measurement as a predictor of low back pain after total hip arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 32:4452–4463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07956-2. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-023-07956-237779107)
Tang H, Guo S, Ma Z, Wang S, Zhou Y (2024) A patient-specific algorithm for predicting the standing sagittal pelvic tilt one year after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 106:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B1.BJJ-2023-0640.R1. (PMID: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B1.BJJ-2023-0640.R138160697)
Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M (2011) Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty 26:209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.013. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.01320462736)
Okamoto Y, Wakama H, Matsuyama J, Nakamura K, Otsuki S, Neo M (2022) Association of the psoas muscle index and sagittal spinal alignment with patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 37:1111–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.012. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.01235151804)
Florissi I, Galea V, Shin D et al (2021) External validation of achieving the patient acceptable symptom state for the EuroQol-5 Dimension 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103:e5. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00184. (PMID: 10.2106/JBJS.20.0018433165129)
Kunze KN, Fontana MA, MacLean CH, Lyman S, McLawhorn AS (2022) Defining the patient acceptable symptom state for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR after primary total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 104:345–352. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00550. (PMID: 10.2106/JBJS.21.0055034958538)
Deckey DG, Verhey JT, Christopher ZK et al (2023) Discordance abounds in minimum clinically important differences in THA: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 481:702–714. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002434. (PMID: 10.1097/CORR.000000000000243436398323)
Perronne L, Haehnel O, Chevret S et al (2021) How is quality of life after total hip replacement related to the reconstructed anatomy? A study with low-dose stereoradiography. Diagn Interv Imaging 102:101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2020.05.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.05.00432532576)
Okamoto Y, Wakama H, Okayoshi T, Otsuki S, Neo M (2021) Association of global sagittal spinal deformity with functional disability two years after total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:523. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04415-1. (PMID: 10.1186/s12891-021-04415-1340989248185940)
Iwasa M, Ando W, Uemura K, Hamada H, Takao M, Sugano N (2021) Pelvic incidence is not associated with the development of hip osteoarthritis. Bone Joint J 103:1656–1661. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B11.BJJ-2021-0472.R1. (PMID: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B11.BJJ-2021-0472.R134719275)
Wakama H, Okamoto Y, Okayoshi T et al (2024) Unfavorable cortical hypertrophy potentially predisposes to periprosthetic “axe splitter” fracture in a collarless polished curved triple-tapered cemented stem: The time-dependent radiographic change in five SC-stem cases. J Orthop Sci 29:439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2022.09.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.09.00436182639)
Danoff JR, Goel R, Sutton R, Maltenfort MG, Austin MS (2018) How much pain is significant? defining the minimal clinically important difference for the visual analog scale for pain after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:S71-S75.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.029. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.02929567002)
Goodman SM, Mehta BY, Kahlenberg CA et al (2020) Assessment of a satisfaction measure for use after primary total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 35:1792-1799.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.039. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.03932173615)
Morvan G, Mathieu P, Vuillemin V et al (2011) Standardized way for imaging of the sagittal spinal balance. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):602–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1927-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-011-1927-y218300813175923)
Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N et al (2014) The T1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01459. (PMID: 10.2106/JBJS.M.0145925274788)
Nakamura K, Okamoto Y, Wakama H et al (2023) T1 pelvic angle is associated with rapid progression of hip arthrosis. Eur Spine J 32:1463–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07580-0. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-023-07580-036800021)
Rudisill SS, Varady NH, Birir A, Goodman SM, Parks ML, Amen TB (2023) Racial and ethnic disparities in total joint arthroplasty care: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 38:171-187.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.00635985539)
York PJ, McGee AW Jr, Dean CS et al (2018) The relationship of pelvic incidence to post-operative total hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients with lumbar fusion. Int Orthop 42:2301–2306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3955-2. (PMID: 10.1007/s00264-018-3955-229704024)
Zhou S, Xu F, Wang W, Zou D, Sun Z, Li W (2020) Age-based normal sagittal alignment in Chinese asymptomatic adults: establishment of the relationships between pelvic incidence and other parameters. Eur Spine J 29:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06178-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-019-06178-931664567)
Yan L, Ge L, Dong S et al (2023) Evaluation of comparative efficacy and safety of surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 6:e2253942. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53942. (PMID: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53942367196799890287)
Homma Y, Ishii S, Yanagisawa N et al (2020) Pelvic mobility before and after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 44:2267–2274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04688-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s00264-020-04688-632623495)
Teraguchi M, Yoshimura N, Hashizume H et al (2017) Progression, incidence, and risk factors for intervertebral disc degeneration in a longitudinal population-based cohort: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthr Cartil 25:1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2017.01.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.01.001)
Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Cross M et al (2021) Prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years due to musculoskeletal disorders for 195 countries and territories 1990–2017. Arthritis Rheumatol 73:702–714. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41571. (PMID: 10.1002/art.4157133150702)
معلومات مُعتمدة: AS2022A000237517 Johnson and Johnson Medical Research Grant; 21K09239 Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Patient-reported outcome; Pelvic incidence; Sagittal vertical axis; Spinal sagittal imbalance; Total hip arthroplasty
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240408 Date Completed: 20240713 Latest Revision: 20240713
رمز التحديث: 20240713
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06174-9
PMID: 38589707
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06174-9