دورية أكاديمية
The relationship between prescribed ratings of perceived exertion and force production in repeated isometric contractions.
العنوان: | The relationship between prescribed ratings of perceived exertion and force production in repeated isometric contractions. |
---|---|
المؤلفون: | Weilharter F; Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany. Electronic address: felix.weilharter@uni-konstanz.de., Rewitz K; Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany; Dynamics of Human Performance Regulation Laboratory, Institute of Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Germany., Halperin I; Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sylvan Adams Sports Institute, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel., Wolff W; Department of Sport Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Dynamics of Human Performance Regulation Laboratory, Institute of Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Germany. |
المصدر: | Psychology of sport and exercise [Psychol Sport Exerc] 2024 Jul; Vol. 73, pp. 102657. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 06. |
نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
اللغة: | English |
بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 101088724 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1878-5476 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 18785476 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Psychol Sport Exerc Subsets: MEDLINE |
أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: [Amsterdam ; New York : Elsevier |
مواضيع طبية MeSH: | Isometric Contraction*/physiology , Physical Exertion*/physiology , Hand Strength*/physiology, Humans ; Male ; Female ; Young Adult ; Adult ; Perception/physiology ; Feedback, Sensory/physiology |
مستخلص: | Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) are frequently used to monitor and prescribe exercise intensity. However, studies examining the shape and robustness of how feelings of effort map onto objective outputs are limited and report inconsistent results. To address this, we investigated whether (1) producing isometric forces according to RPE levels reliably leads to differences in force output, (2) if feelings of effort map linearly or non-linearly onto force output, and (3) if this mapping is robust when visual feedback and social facilitation are present. In a counterbalanced repeated measures design, N = 26 participants performed isometric handgrip contractions prescribed by ten levels of the Borg CR-10 scale. They did so either with or without the availability of concurrent visual feedback regarding their force production, and in the presence or absence of another person performing the same task simultaneously. We found that subjects reliably produced different force outputs that corresponded to each RPE level. Furthermore, concurrent visual feedback led to a linearization of force output, while in the absence of feedback, the produced forces could also be described by quadratic and cubic functions. Exploratory post-hoc analyses revealed that participants perceived moderate RPE levels to be more challenging to produce. By shedding light on the dynamic nature of the mapping between RPE and objective performance, our findings provide helpful insights regarding the utility of RPE scales. Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.) |
فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Borg CR-10 scale; Effort; Feedback; Isometric contractions; Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE); Social facilitation |
تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240508 Date Completed: 20240530 Latest Revision: 20240814 |
رمز التحديث: | 20240815 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102657 |
PMID: | 38719021 |
قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
تدمد: | 1878-5476 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102657 |