دورية أكاديمية
Standard methods for marking caudate amphibians do not impair animal welfare over the short term: An experimental approach.
| العنوان: | Standard methods for marking caudate amphibians do not impair animal welfare over the short term: An experimental approach. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Daversa DR; La Kretz Center for California Conservation Science, Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London, UK., Baxter E; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London, UK., Rosa GM; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London, UK.; Biodiversity Research Institute (IMIB-CSIC, Universidad de Oviedo, Principality of Asturias), Mieres, Spain.; Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C) & Global Change and Sustainability Institute (CHANGE), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal., Sargeant C; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London, UK., Garner T; Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London, UK.; Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, UCL, London, UK.; Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa. |
| المصدر: | Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) [Anim Welf] 2024 May 03; Vol. 33, pp. e24. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 03 (Print Publication: 2024). |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Cambridge University Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9214272 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 0962-7286 (Print) Linking ISSN: 09627286 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Anim Welf Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Publication: 2023- : Cambridge : Cambridge University Press Original Publication: South Mimms, Potters Bar, Herts, UK : Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, c1992- |
| مستخلص: | Major advancements in ecology and biodiversity conservation have been made thanks to methods for marking and individually tracking animals. Marking animals is both widely used and controversial due to the potential consequences for animal welfare, which are often incompletely evaluated prior to implementation. Two outstanding knowledge gaps concerning the welfare consequences of individual marking are their short-term behavioural impacts and the relative impacts from marking versus the handling of animals while carrying out procedures. We addressed these knowledge gaps through an experimental study of alpine newts ( Ichthyosaura alpestris ) in which we varied handling and marking procedures. Examining individual responses to handling, toe clipping and visible implant elastomer (VIE) injection over 21 days showed that handling and marking elicited increased newt activity and hesitancy to feed compared to animals that did not get handled or marked. These effects were apparent even when animals were handled only (not marked), and marking did not further increase the magnitude of responses. Increases in newt activity and feeding hesitancy were transient; they were not observed in the weeks following handling and marking. While previous studies emphasise the welfare impacts of marking procedures themselves, these findings highlight that handling alone can elicit behavioural changes with possible costs to welfare. Yet, the transient nature of behavioural responses suggests that immediate costs of handling may be subsequently compensated for in the short term. Competing Interests: None. (© The Author(s) 2024.) |
| References: | J Exp Biol. 2021 Jul 1;224(13):. (PMID: 34114002) Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011 Nov 1;174(2):238-45. (PMID: 21945118) Nature. 2023 Oct;622(7982):308-314. (PMID: 37794184) Horm Behav. 2003 Jan;43(1):2-15. (PMID: 12614627) Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 20;284(1869):. (PMID: 29263283) Curr Biol. 2019 May 6;29(9):R309-R313. (PMID: 31063718) Physiol Behav. 2012 Mar 20;105(5):1132-9. (PMID: 22210392) Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Dec;96(6):2602-2616. (PMID: 34155749) J Anim Sci. 1991 Oct;69(10):4167-75. (PMID: 1778832) PLoS One. 2017 Jul 21;12(7):e0181972. (PMID: 28732029) Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Feb 24;288(1945):20202966. (PMID: 33622122) Trends Ecol Evol. 2023 Mar;38(3):217-218. (PMID: 36586766) Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Feb;21(2):77-82. (PMID: 16701478) PeerJ. 2014 Oct 09;2:e616. (PMID: 25320683) Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):568-76. (PMID: 21359908) Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 25;10(1):3409. (PMID: 32098990) Dis Aquat Organ. 2009 Feb 25;83(3):257-60. (PMID: 19402457) Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 14;11(11):. (PMID: 34827991) Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 27;13(5):. (PMID: 36899728) Horm Behav. 1984 Dec;18(4):400-10. (PMID: 6097527) |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Amphibians; animal behaviour; animal welfare science; experimental biology; marking methods; wildlife health |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240509 Latest Revision: 20240510 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240510 |
| مُعرف محوري في PubMed: | PMC11076918 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/awf.2024.26 |
| PMID: | 38721625 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 0962-7286 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1017/awf.2024.26 |