دورية أكاديمية

Biomechanical and histological comparison of two suture configurations for soft tissue grafts: speedtrap™ versus krackow stitch.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Biomechanical and histological comparison of two suture configurations for soft tissue grafts: speedtrap™ versus krackow stitch.
المؤلفون: Olivos-Meza A; Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Medica Sur, Mexico City, Mexico., Hernández-Espinoza EM; Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico., Domínguez-Hernández VM; Investigator Biomechanics Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico., Araujo-Monsalvo VM; Head of the Biomechanics Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico., Estrada-Villaseñor EG; Pathological Anatomy Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico., Pichardo-Bahena R; Head of Pathological Anatomy Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico., Murguía-González LÁ; Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico., Rodríguez-Reinoso JD; Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico., de Jesus Hernández-León J; Orthopedic Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Department, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico., Landa-Solis C; Investigator, Tissue Engineering, Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Unit, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Calzada México Xochimilco 289, 14389, Mexico City, Mexico. clanda@inr.gob.mx.
المصدر: Cell and tissue banking [Cell Tissue Bank] 2024 Jun; Vol. 25 (2), pp. 705-712. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 10.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Comparative Study
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Kluwer Academic Publishers Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 100965121 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-6814 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13899333 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Cell Tissue Bank Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Dordrecht, the Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Publishers, c2000-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Suture Techniques* , Tendons*/physiology , Sutures*, Biomechanical Phenomena ; Humans ; Tensile Strength
مستخلص: To compare 2 different graft preparation techniques to determine biomechanical strength and resultant tissue trauma evaluated by histology. Twelve common flexors of the finger's tendons were prepared with either tubulization (SpeedTrap™) or transtendon stiches (Orthocord™). The stiffness, resistance and energy at maximum load were tested for biomechanical assessment in both groups. After load testing, Samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) to evaluate histological damage. We observe that the time to prepare tendons with SpeedTrap™ was 8.3 times faster (1:25 min) than traditional ones (15:02 min). In all cases, the mean values for SpeedTrap™ were higher in terms of strength, stiffness and energy at maximum load than for traditional suture but without significant difference (p > 0.05). The Krackow stitch produces greater structural damage to the collagen fibers while SpeedTrap™ maintains better organized arrangement of the fibers after tubulization preparation. With the results obtained, we can conclude that the tubulization technique allows faster graft preparation with less structural damage to the manipulated tissue without altering the biomechanical resistance provided by the transtendon suture technique.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)
References: Barber FA, Howard MS, Piccirillo J, Spenciner DB (2019) A biomechanical comparison of six suture configurations for soft tissue-based graft traction and fixation. Arthroscopy 35:1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.140. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.14030871909)
Camarda L, Giambartino S, Lauria M, Saporito M, Triolo V, D’Arienzo M (2016) Surgical time for graft preparation using different suture techniques. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 6:236–240. https://doi.org/10.11138/mltj/2016.6.2.236. (PMID: 10.11138/mltj/2016.6.2.236279002985115256)
Cash MP, Sherrill JM, Waitayawinyu T, Hunt TR 3rd, Shack RB, Thayer WP (2012) Evaluation of FiberLoop sutures in locking and nonlocking tendon repair. Ann Plast Surg 68:583–587. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31821b6a0b. (PMID: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31821b6a0b21734555)
Fang CH, Li M, Zhang YF, Liu H (2021) Extra-articular migration of PEEK interference screw after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a report of two cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:498. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04387-2. (PMID: 10.1186/s12891-021-04387-2340517678164745)
Hong CK, Chang CH, Chiang CH, Jou IM, Su WR (2014) Hamstring graft preparation using a modified rolling hitch technique. Arthrosc Tech 3:e321-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2014.01.010. (PMID: 10.1016/j.eats.2014.01.010251264954129977)
Hong CK, Kuo TH, Yeh ML, Jou IM, Lin CL, Su WR (2017) Do needleless knots have similar strength as the krackow suture? An in vitro porcine tendon study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:552–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5153-0. (PMID: 10.1007/s11999-016-5153-027822894)
Hong CK, Lin CL, Kuan FC, Wang PH, Yeh ML, Su WR (2018) Longer stitch interval in the Krackow stitch for tendon graft fixation leads to poorer biomechanical property. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 26:2309499018799514. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018799514. (PMID: 10.1177/230949901879951430235966)
LaPrade RF, Hamilton CD, Montgomery RD, Wentorf F, Hawkins HD (1997) The reharvested central third of the patellar tendon. A histologic and biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 25:779–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659702500609. (PMID: 10.1177/0363546597025006099397265)
LaPrade RF, DePhillipo NN, Dornan GJ, Kennedy MI, Cram TR, Dekker TJ, Strauss MJ, Engebretsen L, Lind M (2022) Comparative outcomes occur after superficial medial collateral ligament augmented repair vs reconstruction: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled equivalence trial. Am J Sports Med 50:968–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211069373. (PMID: 10.1177/0363546521106937335107354)
Mae T, Shimomura K, Ohori T, Hirose T, Taketomi S, Suzuki T, Nakata K (2021) Suture slippage during anterior cruciate ligament graft passage is significantly lower using a krackow suture. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 3:e1337–e1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.003347129718527264)
Martin DK, Falworth MS (2007) Anterior cruciate ligament graft preparation: a new and quick alternative to the whipstitch. Arthroscopy 23:326.e321–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.031. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.031)
McCabe MP (2019) Editorial commentary: stronger and faster suture configuration-but is it better? Challenges of surgical innovation in the modern era. Arthroscopy 35:1170–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.00630954110)
Moralle MR, DeCotiis M, Chen L, Galdi B, Cottrell J (2018) Effect of suture tubularization on quadruple stranded hamstring ACL grafts with femoral suspensory fixation: a biomechanical study. Orthop Res Online J 2:2–6. https://doi.org/10.31031/OPROJ.2018.02.000538. (PMID: 10.31031/OPROJ.2018.02.000538)
Sakaguchi K, Tachibana Y, Oda H (2012) Biomechanical properties of porcine flexor tendon fixation with varying throws and stitch methods. Am J Sports Med 40:1641–1645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512450406. (PMID: 10.1177/036354651245040622691458)
Sanders JO, Brown GA, Murray J, Pezold R, Sevarino KS (2016) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 24:e81-83. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00154. (PMID: 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-0015427355285)
Su WR, Chu CH, Lin CL, Lin CJ, Jou IM, Chang CW (2012) The modified finger-trap suture technique: a biomechanical comparison of a novel suture technique for graft fixation. Arthroscopy 28:702–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.014. (PMID: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.10.01422261138)
Tomihara T, Ohashi H, Yo H (2007) Comparison of direct and indirect interference screw fixation for tendon graft in rabbits. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:26–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0118-6. (PMID: 10.1007/s00167-006-0118-616951980)
Wang RY, Arciero RA, Obopilwe E, Mazzocca AD (2010) A comparison of structural and mechanical properties of tubularized and native semitendinosus graft. Am J Sports Med 38:1246–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509359061. (PMID: 10.1177/036354650935906120207837)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Histological tendon damage; Krakow stich; Tendon preparation sutures; Tendon resistance; Tubulization tendon preparation
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240509 Date Completed: 20240531 Latest Revision: 20240531
رمز التحديث: 20240531
DOI: 10.1007/s10561-024-10133-4
PMID: 38724712
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1573-6814
DOI:10.1007/s10561-024-10133-4