دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Comparative Analysis of Silicone Tube Intubation Versus Probing and Balloon Dilation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Comparative Analysis of Silicone Tube Intubation Versus Probing and Balloon Dilation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
المؤلفون: Alruwaili R; Department of Ophthalmology, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh.; Department of Ophthalmology, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital., Alanazi F; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Prince Mohammed Medical City, Jouf., Alrashidi A; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, King Salman Specialist Hospital, Hail., Hazazi M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Prince Sultan Medical Military City, Riyadh., Alenezi M; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Collage of Medicine, Qassim University, Buriyadh, Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
المصدر: The Journal of craniofacial surgery [J Craniofac Surg] 2024 Jun 01; Vol. 35 (4), pp. 1114-1119. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 10.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis; Comparative Study
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9010410 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1536-3732 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10492275 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Craniofac Surg Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: <2014-> : Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Original Publication: Burlington, Ont. : B.C. Decker, c1990-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Intubation*/instrumentation , Lacrimal Duct Obstruction*/congenital , Lacrimal Duct Obstruction*/therapy , Silicones*, Humans ; Infant ; Dilatation/methods ; Dilatation/instrumentation ; Nasolacrimal Duct/surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Child, Preschool
مستخلص: Objective: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a pediatric disorder with a wide range of pathology. If untreated, the condition may end up with serious complications. Multiple treatment options for CNLDO exist throughout the literature, and there is an ongoing debate on the best intervention for each disease subgroup and the best timing of such interventions. This study compares the success and failure rates of silicone tube intubation (STI) against probing and balloon dilation (BD).
Methods: The authors searched the literature for relevant articles using PubMed, Scopus, web of Science, and Cochrane Library until January 2024. Using RevMan 5.4, the authors compared STI's success and failure rates to probing and BD using risk ratios (RRs) and a random-effect model. In addition, the complication rate of monocanalicular intubation (MCI) versus bicanalicular intubation (BCI) was investigated. The authors used the leave-one-out method to check for influential studies and to resolve heterogeneity.
Results: The screening process resulted in 23 eligible articles for inclusion in the authors' review. Silicone tube intubation had a higher chance of resolving the symptoms of CNLDO than probing (RR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.20; P = 0.004) while having less risk of surgical failure (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.76; P = 0.002]. Monocanalicular intubation showed no statistically significant difference when compared with BCI in terms of surgical success and failure; however, MCI had a lower risk of complications (RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.97; P = 0.04). In addition, STI did not demonstrate any significant difference from BD.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in success/failure between MCI and BCI; monocanalicular had fewer complications. Silicone tube intubation did better in terms of surgical success than probing, especially in children over 12 months, suggesting that it is the preferred intervention for older patients with CNLDO.
Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)
References: Schnall BM. Pediatric nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013;24:421.
Aldahash FD, Al-Mubarak MF, Alenezi SH, et al. Risk factors for developing congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2014;28:58–60.
Heichel J. Step-by-step concept for the treatment of congenital dacryostenosis [Stufenkonzept zur Therapie der konnatalen Dakryostenose]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2017;234:1250–1258.
Crigler LW. The treatment of congenital dacryocystitis. J Am Med Assoc 1923;81:23–24.
Cassady JV. Dacryocystitis of infancy. Am J Ophthalmol 1948;31:773–780.
Repka MX, Melia BM, Beck RW, et al. Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nasolacrimal duct intubation in children less than four years old. J AAPOS 2008;12:445–450.
Gazit I, Pras E, Or L, et al. Balloon catheter dilation as the primary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021;31:334–339.
Nanda D, Sarkar M. Efficacy of lacrimal sac massage in management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants: an observational study of 853 cases from a single institute of Eastern Asia. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2022;29:216.
Kushner BJ. Congenital nasolacrimal system obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:597–600.
Miller AM, Chandler DL, Repka MX, et al. Group obotPEDI: office probing for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants. J AAPOS 2014;18:26.
Lee KA, Chandler DL, Repka MX, et al. A randomized trial comparing the cost-effectiveness of 2 approaches for treating unilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:1525–1533.
Morrison DG, Binenbaum G, Chang MY, et al. Office or facility-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2021;128:920–927.
Goldstein SM, Goldstein JB, Katowitz JA. Comparison of monocanalicular stenting and balloon dacryoplasty in secondary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed primary probing. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20:352.
Repka MX, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, et al. Balloon catheter dilation and nasolacrimal duct intubation for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed probing. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:633–639.
Al-Faky YH, Al-Sobaie N, Mousa A, et al. Evaluation of treatment modalities and prognostic factors in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J AAPOS 2012;16:53–57.
Al-Faky YH, Mousa A, Kalantan H, et al. A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 2015;99:246–250.
Elsawaby EA, El Essawy RA, Abdelbaky SH, et al. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:1487–1493.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane, 2023. https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:I4898.
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non‐randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003;73:712–716.
Study Quality Assessment Tools. Accessed July, 2021. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.
Alahmadawy YA, Abdelfattah RA, Elessawy KB. Assessment of the role of intranasal silicone-tube fixation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a comparative study. Delta J Ophthalmol 2021;22:323–329.
Andalib D, Gharabaghi D, Nabai R, et al. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J AAPOS 2010;14:421–424.
Andalib D, Mansoori H. A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Int J Ophthalmol 2014;7:1039.
Arici C, Mergen B, Ozan T, et al. Comparison of endoscopically assisted primary probing and bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children aged 4 to 7 years. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2023;60:101–107.
Ceylan K, Yuksel D, Duman S, et al. Comparison of two endoscopically assisted procedures in primary surgical treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 3 years: balloon dilatation and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:11–17.
Eshraghi B, Jamshidian-Tehrani M, Mirmohammadsadeghi A. Comparison of the success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular intubations in incomplete complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Orbit 2017;36:215–217.
Eustis HS, Nguyen AH. The treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children: a retrospective review. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2018;55:65–67.
Fayet B, Bernard J-A, Assouline M, et al. Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct impatency in children: a comparative study. Orbit 1993;12:149–156.
Fayet B, Racy E, Ruban JM, et al. Preloaded Monoka (Lacrijet) and congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: initial results. J FrOphtalmol 2021;44:670–679.
Hirt B, Granzotto EE, Silva FL, et al. Efficacy of monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Rev Bras Oftalmol 2020;79:33–37.
Kaufman LM, Guay-Bhatia LA. Monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 1998;105:336–341.
Killedar M, Sasurkar P, Gokhale N, et al. Retrospective analysis of silicon intubation by Ritleng probe and Sutupak suture fixed in silicone tube in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Indian J Ophthalmol 2021;69:2095.
Kim D, Lew H. Comparison of outcomes of silicone tube intubation with or without dacryoendoscopy for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Clin Med 2023;12:7370.
Komínek P, Cervenka S, Matoušek P. Does the length of intubation affect the success of treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction? Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;26:103–105.
Komínek P, Červenka S, Pniak T, et al. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:1729–1733.
Lee H, Ahn J, Lee JM, et al. Clinical effectiveness of monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:1010–1014.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Repka MX, Melia BM, et al. Pediatric eye disease investigator G: primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nasolacrimal duct intubation in children younger than 4 years of age. J AAPOS 2008;12:445–450.
Rajabi MT, Zavarzadeh N, Mahmoudi A, et al. Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Int J Ophthalmol 2016;9:1466.
Sagiv OY, Nemet A, Achiron A, et al. Outcomes of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction surgery converted into balloon dilation and silicone intubation due to probing difficulty. J Ophthalmol 2022;2022:4045789.
Macewen CJ, Young JDH. Epiphora during the first year of life. Eye 1991;5:596–600.
Price HW. Dacryostenosis. J Pediatr 1947;30:302–305.
Kakizaki H, Takahashi Y, Kinoshita S, et al. The rate of symptomatic improvement of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Japanese infants treated with conservative management during the 1st year of age. Clin Ophthalmol 2008;2:291–294.
Stager D, Baker JD, Frey T, et al. Office probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmic Surg 1992;23:482–484.
Miller AM, Chandler DL, Repka MX, et al. Office probing for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants. J AAPOS 2014;18:26–30.
Vagge A, Ferro Desideri L, Nucci P, et al. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO): a review. Diseases 2018;6:96.
Lim CS, Martin F, Beckenham T, et al. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children: outcome of intubation. J AAPOS 2004;8:466–472.
Tao S, Meyer DR, Simon JW, et al. Success of balloon catheter dilatation as a primary or secondary procedure for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 2002;109:2108–2111.
المشرفين على المادة: 0 (Silicones)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240510 Date Completed: 20240603 Latest Revision: 20240605
رمز التحديث: 20240605
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010273
PMID: 38727216
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1536-3732
DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010273