دورية أكاديمية

The predominant lactic acid bacteria and yeasts involved in the spontaneous fermentation of millet during the production of the traditional porridge Hausa koko in Ghana.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The predominant lactic acid bacteria and yeasts involved in the spontaneous fermentation of millet during the production of the traditional porridge Hausa koko in Ghana.
المؤلفون: Atter A; Food Microbiology and Mushroom Research Division, CSIR-Food Research Institute, Accra, Ghana. amykuus@yahoo.com.; Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. amykuus@yahoo.com.; Food and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK. amykuus@yahoo.com., Diaz M; Food and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK., Tano-Debrah K; Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana., Parry-Hanson Kunadu A; Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana., Mayer MJ; Gut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK., Sayavedra L; Gut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK., Misita C; Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana., Amoa-Awua W; Food Microbiology and Mushroom Research Division, CSIR-Food Research Institute, Accra, Ghana.; Department of Agro-Processing Technology and Food Bio-Sciences, CSIR College of Science and Technology, Accra, Ghana., Narbad A; Food and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.; Gut Microbes and Health Institute Strategic Programme, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
المصدر: BMC microbiology [BMC Microbiol] 2024 May 14; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 163. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 14.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100966981 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2180 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712180 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Microbiol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Fermentation* , Yeasts*/classification , Yeasts*/isolation & purification , Yeasts*/genetics , Yeasts*/metabolism , Food Microbiology* , Fermented Foods*/microbiology , Millets*/microbiology, Ghana ; Lactobacillales/classification ; Lactobacillales/isolation & purification ; Lactobacillales/genetics ; Lactobacillales/metabolism ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics ; Phylogeny ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Edible Grain/microbiology
مستخلص: Spontaneous fermentation of cereals like millet involves a diverse population of microbes from various sources, including raw materials, processing equipment, fermenting receptacles, and the environment. Here, we present data on the predominant microbial species and their succession at each stage of the Hausa koko production process from five regions of Ghana. The isolates were enumerated using selective media, purified, and phenotypically characterised. The LAB isolates were further characterised by 16S rRNA Sanger sequencing, typed using (GTG) 5 repetitive-PCR, and whole genome sequencing, while 28S rRNA Sanger sequencing was performed for yeast identification. The pH of the millet grains ranged from mean values of 6.02-6.53 to 3.51-3.99 in the final product, depending on the processors. The mean LAB and yeast counts increased during fermentation then fell to final counts of log 2.77-3.95 CFU/g for LAB and log 2.10-2.98 CFU/g for yeast in Hausa koko samples. At the various processing stages, the counts of LAB and yeast revealed significant variations (p < 0.0001). The species of LAB identified in this study were Limosilactobacillus pontis, Pediococcus acidilactici, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Schleiferilactobacillus harbinensis, and Weissella confusa. The yeasts were Saccharomyces cf. cerevisiae/paradoxus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia kudriavzevii, Clavispora lusitaniae and Candida tropicalis. The identification and sequencing of these novel isolates and how they change during the fermentation process will pave the way for future controlled fermentation, safer starter cultures, and identifying optimal stages for starter culture addition or nutritional interventions. These LAB and yeast species are linked to many indigenous African fermented foods, potentially acting as probiotics in some cases. This result serves as the basis for further studies into the technological and probiotic potential of these Hausa koko microorganisms.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
References: PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jun 8;13(6):e1005595. (PMID: 28594827)
J Biosci Bioeng. 2013 Nov;116(5):533-9. (PMID: 23791634)
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Jan;22(1):69-75. (PMID: 23155139)
Front Microbiol. 2019 Aug 06;10:1789. (PMID: 31447811)
Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90. (PMID: 16928733)
Microb Genom. 2020 Sep;6(9):. (PMID: 32924917)
Genom Data. 2015 Oct 30;6:283-4. (PMID: 26697400)
NPJ Sci Food. 2022 Feb 18;6(1):15. (PMID: 35181677)
PeerJ. 2019 Jul 26;7:e7359. (PMID: 31388474)
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W242-5. (PMID: 27095192)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 25;105(12):4957-62. (PMID: 18344325)
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(11):2985-3001. (PMID: 33337242)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Nov 1;150(2-3):115-21. (PMID: 21862164)
Meat Sci. 2007 May;76(1):138-46. (PMID: 22064200)
mSystems. 2019 Sep 3;4(5):. (PMID: 31481604)
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Apr;39(4):1241-6. (PMID: 11283035)
3 Biotech. 2018 Nov;8(11):451. (PMID: 30333953)
FEMS Yeast Res. 2003 Apr;3(2):191-200. (PMID: 12702452)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Oct 1;111(3):228-33. (PMID: 16842876)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Nov 30;120(1-2):159-66. (PMID: 17904237)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2002 Nov 15;79(1-2):131-41. (PMID: 12382693)
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2009 Sep;32(6):438-48. (PMID: 19243908)
PLoS Genet. 2005 Jul;1(1):66-71. (PMID: 16103919)
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 26;7:578. (PMID: 27199913)
Nature. 2003 May 15;423(6937):241-54. (PMID: 12748633)
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020 Apr;70(4):2782-2858. (PMID: 32293557)
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1312-3. (PMID: 24451623)
Food Microbiol. 2015 Jun;48:123-32. (PMID: 25791000)
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2020 Jun;70(1):e102. (PMID: 32559359)
Int J Food Microbiol. 1996 Aug;31(1-3):87-98. (PMID: 8880299)
J Appl Microbiol. 1997 Sep;83(3):288-96. (PMID: 9351208)
Cell Syst. 2017 Oct 25;5(4):345-357.e6. (PMID: 28964698)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Jul 15;165(2):84-8. (PMID: 23727651)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Nov 1;160(1):1-10. (PMID: 23141639)
J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Sep;109(3):851-62. (PMID: 20353430)
Genome Res. 2016 Dec;26(12):1721-1729. (PMID: 27852649)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Aug;67(8):3450-4. (PMID: 11472918)
FEMS Yeast Res. 2003 Apr;3(2):177-84. (PMID: 12702450)
Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Jan 6;51(D1):D678-D689. (PMID: 36350631)
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15;28(12):1647-9. (PMID: 22543367)
Front Microbiol. 2015 Mar 17;6:155. (PMID: 25852652)
Bioinformatics. 2012 Apr 1;28(7):1033-4. (PMID: 22332237)
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Feb;102(2):599-606. (PMID: 17241367)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Apr 15;130(3):205-12. (PMID: 19239979)
Genome Res. 2017 May;27(5):824-834. (PMID: 28298430)
Food Microbiol. 2017 Apr;62:169-177. (PMID: 27889145)
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Oct;103(4):765-77. (PMID: 17897178)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2002 May 25;75(3):197-212. (PMID: 12036143)
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Jan 30;94(2):331-40. (PMID: 23765582)
J Appl Microbiol. 2004;96(2):384-97. (PMID: 14723700)
Food Microbiol. 2012 Oct;32(1):72-8. (PMID: 22850376)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Feb 15;80(3):201-10. (PMID: 12494920)
Mol Biol Rep. 2019 Dec;46(6):5883-5895. (PMID: 31392538)
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 15;29(8):1072-5. (PMID: 23422339)
Genome Res. 2015 Jul;25(7):1043-55. (PMID: 25977477)
Food Microbiol. 2018 Dec;76:267-278. (PMID: 30166150)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Oct 15;159(3):240-6. (PMID: 23107503)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4645-52. (PMID: 20615995)
Mol Ecol. 2015 Apr;24(7):1596-610. (PMID: 25706044)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Mar;74(6):1812-9. (PMID: 18245259)
BMC Microbiol. 2012 May 17;12:75. (PMID: 22594449)
Front Microbiol. 2018 Apr 19;9:757. (PMID: 29725324)
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e112963. (PMID: 25409509)
Int J Food Sci. 2014;2014:721067. (PMID: 26904646)
Front Microbiol. 2021 Aug 04;12:681983. (PMID: 34421842)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 May 16;85(11):. (PMID: 30902861)
Food Microbiol. 2007 Sep;24(6):571-6. (PMID: 17418307)
Food Microbiol. 2012 Sep;31(2):254-62. (PMID: 22608231)
J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Dec;55(3):541-55. (PMID: 14607398)
Bioinformatics. 2019 Nov 15;:. (PMID: 31730192)
Benef Microbes. 2010 Sep;1(3):243-52. (PMID: 21831760)
FEMS Yeast Res. 2005 Feb;5(4-5):441-53. (PMID: 15691749)
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Aug;103(2):342-9. (PMID: 17650194)
FEMS Yeast Res. 2002 Jan;1(4):299-306. (PMID: 12702333)
Infect Immun. 2011 Nov;79(11):4286-98. (PMID: 21896772)
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7. (PMID: 15034147)
Curr Genet. 2021 Dec;67(6):891-907. (PMID: 34195871)
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Feb 15;80(3):187-99. (PMID: 12423921)
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1998 May;73(4):331-71. (PMID: 9850420)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Hausa koko; Fermented millet; Lactic acid bacteria; Whole genome sequencing (WGS); Yeast
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240514 Date Completed: 20240515 Latest Revision: 20240518
رمز التحديث: 20240518
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11092135
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03317-1
PMID: 38745280
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1471-2180
DOI:10.1186/s12866-024-03317-1