دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

The value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the fetal body: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the fetal body: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
المؤلفون: Wilson L; School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Level 4, Jessop Wing, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield, S10 2SF, UK. Louise.wilson@sheffield.ac.uk., Whitby EH; School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Level 4, Jessop Wing, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield, S10 2SF, UK.; Medical Imaging and Medical Physics, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.
المصدر: BMC medical imaging [BMC Med Imaging] 2024 May 16; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 111. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 16.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis; Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968553 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2342 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712342 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Med Imaging Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Magnetic Resonance Imaging*/methods , Prenatal Diagnosis*/methods, Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Congenital Abnormalities/diagnostic imaging ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Reproducibility of Results ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods
مستخلص: Objectives: To undertake a systematic review to assess the accuracy of fetal MRI in diagnosis of non-CNS congenital anomalies of the fetal body in comparison with antenatal ultrasound when correlated to postnatal diagnosis.
Methods: Searches were conducted from electronic databases, key journals and reference lists for eligible papers. Inclusion criteria was original research studies comparing the diagnostic results of antenatal ultrasound, fetal MRI and final postnatal diagnosis via imaging, surgery or post-mortem testing. Studies of CNS anomalies were excluded. Studies were assessed for risk of bias by two reviewers working independently and data was then extracted by a single reviewer.
Results: 12 studies were included with a total of 361 eligible patients who underwent USS and MRI and had a postnatal diagnosis. USS alone had a diagnostic accuracy of 60.6% whereas MRI had an improved diagnostic accuracy of 86.4%. The overall odds ratio was 0.86 (CI 0.202-1.519 and p-value < 0.01).
Conclusion: Fetal MRI makes a significant contribution to accurate diagnosis of congenital abnormalities of the fetal body; especially in genito-urinary anomalies. More research is needed to improve the evidence base for the role of fetal MRI in diagnosis of congenital anomalies in other body systems.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
References: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F372-F377. (PMID: 30049725)
Eur Radiol. 2003 Jul;13(7):1538-48. (PMID: 12695920)
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Mar;182(3):689-95. (PMID: 14975971)
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Jun;50(3):237-41. (PMID: 20618240)
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Nov;108:128-132. (PMID: 30396644)
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e860-6. (PMID: 24119429)
Radiol Res Pract. 2020 Sep 29;2020:4085349. (PMID: 33062332)
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Jun;5(6):447-458. (PMID: 33721554)
J Pediatr Urol. 2008 Feb;4(1):32-9. (PMID: 18631889)
Rofo. 2022 Aug;194(8):841-851. (PMID: 35905903)
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun;27(6):2367-2380. (PMID: 27655301)
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Sep;181(9):3243-3257. (PMID: 35794403)
Prenat Diagn. 2017 Nov;37(11):1138-1145. (PMID: 28921932)
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2017 Sep-Oct;20(5):403-410. (PMID: 28812458)
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. (PMID: 33782057)
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 06;6(1):245. (PMID: 29208034)
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Aug;51(9):1626-1636. (PMID: 33891148)
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36. (PMID: 22007046)
Front Pediatr. 2019 Jun 13;7:239. (PMID: 31249823)
Prenat Diagn. 2015 Jul;35(7):669-74. (PMID: 25754771)
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Nov;76(2):258-64. (PMID: 19643559)
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):538-546. (PMID: 27988140)
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Dec;111(3):209-12. (PMID: 20870231)
J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Nov;27(11):1563-9. (PMID: 18946095)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Congenital anomaly; Fetal; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prenatal diagnosis; Ultrasound
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240516 Date Completed: 20240516 Latest Revision: 20240519
رمز التحديث: 20240519
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11097489
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01286-5
PMID: 38755547
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1471-2342
DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01286-5