دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Crosswalk between the PROMIS physical function CAT and PROMIS upper extremity CAT v1.2 in a hand surgery population.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Crosswalk between the PROMIS physical function CAT and PROMIS upper extremity CAT v1.2 in a hand surgery population.
المؤلفون: Rogers MJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA., Daryoush JR; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA., Zhang C; Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA., Cizik A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA., Presson AP; Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA., Kazmers NH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. nkazmers@gmail.com.
المصدر: Journal of patient-reported outcomes [J Patient Rep Outcomes] 2024 May 30; Vol. 8 (1), pp. 53. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 30.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer International Publishing Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 101722688 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2509-8020 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 25098020 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Patient Rep Outcomes Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: [Heidelberg] : Springer International Publishing, [2017]-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Patient Reported Outcome Measures* , Hand*/surgery, Humans ; Female ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Adult ; Upper Extremity/surgery ; Aged
مستخلص: Background: There is no gold standard patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in hand surgery. As a result, a diverse array of PROM instruments have been utilized across centers over time. Lack of score interchangeability limits the ability to compare or conglomerate scores when new instruments are introduced. Our aim was to develop a linkage for the PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS PF CAT scores and develop crosswalk tables for interconversion between these PROMs.
Methods: Retrospective review was conducted to identify adult (≥ 18y) patients seen by orthopaedic hand surgeons at a single academic tertiary care hospital who had completed PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and PROMIS PF CAT score at the same visit. For those with multiple visits, only one randomly selected visit was included in the analyses. Pearson's correlation was calculated to determine the linear relationship between the scores. Linkage from PF to UE was performed utilizing several commonly utilized equating models (identity, mean, linear, equipercentile and circle-arc methods). The performance of the models was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC) between observed PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 and estimated PROMIS UE CAT v1.2 scores generated using the model as well as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The model chosen as the 'best' was further assessed for population invariance using root expected mean squared difference (REMSD) where < 0.08 were considered good.
Results: Of 10,081 included patients, mean age was 48.3 (SD = 17.0), and 54% were female (5,477/10,081). Mean UE CAT v1.2 and PF CAT scores were 37 (SD = 9.8) and 46 (SD = 10.0), respectively. There was a strong correlation between the scores (Pearson correlation r = 0.70). All methods performed acceptably (ICC ≥ 0.66 and RMSE < = 7.52 for all). The equipercentile method had the highest ICC (ICC = 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.71)) while the mean and circle arc methods had the lowest RMSE. The circle arc method is the most reliable with the smallest standard error and has satisfactory population invariance across age group (REMSD 0.065) and sex (REMSD 0.036).
Conclusions: Crosswalk tables to be used for bidirectional conversion between scores were created.
Level of Evidence: III.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
References: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Dec 1;479(12):2653-2664. (PMID: 34114974)
N Engl J Med. 1988 Nov 3;319(18):1220-2. (PMID: 3173460)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):311-7. (PMID: 25099262)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):549-551. (PMID: 27873097)
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. (PMID: 27330520)
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Dec;24(12):1961-7. (PMID: 26321484)
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):6-9. (PMID: 28679102)
Instr Course Lect. 2019;68:675-680. (PMID: 32032076)
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Jun;29(6):257-63. (PMID: 26001348)
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Apr;30(4):570-577. (PMID: 35081452)
J Hand Ther. 2017 Oct - Dec;30(4):485-490. (PMID: 27919565)
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):449-453. (PMID: 28146398)
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Oct;31(8):1373-9. (PMID: 17027802)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 6;103(1):84-91. (PMID: 33079895)
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Aug 17;9(8):e3768. (PMID: 34422532)
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Oct;42(10):781-787. (PMID: 28890332)
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Nov;42(11):867-874. (PMID: 28709794)
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Jul;40(5):361-362. (PMID: 29881059)
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Apr;44(4):267-273. (PMID: 30819409)
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R147. (PMID: 21914216)
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Sep;42(9):705-710. (PMID: 28709796)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Apr 20;104(8):723-731. (PMID: 35192570)
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Oct;44(10):829-839. (PMID: 31477406)
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Oct;44(10):901.e1-901.e7. (PMID: 30733095)
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Nov/Dec;46(6):273-278. (PMID: 29309444)
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Nov 26;3(1):69. (PMID: 31773413)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jun 3;102(11):983-990. (PMID: 32187121)
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Jun;39(6):1160-5. (PMID: 24799143)
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S3-S11. (PMID: 17443116)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 May 1;480(5):996-1007. (PMID: 34855330)
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1(1):12. (PMID: 29757302)
Clin Plast Surg. 2008 Apr;35(2):239-50. (PMID: 18298996)
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Mar;44(3):186-191.e1. (PMID: 30577995)
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Oct;39(10):2047-2051.e4. (PMID: 25135249)
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2019 Sep;24(3):329-341. (PMID: 31438799)
Psychometrika. 2021 Sep;86(3):717-746. (PMID: 34173935)
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Dec;46(12):1049-1056. (PMID: 34645584)
معلومات مُعتمدة: UL1 TR002538 United States TR NCATS NIH HHS; UL1TR002538 Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Computer adaptive testing; Crosswalk study; PROM; PROMIS-PF; PROMIS-UE CAT; Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system; Physical function; Upper extremity
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240530 Date Completed: 20240530 Latest Revision: 20240603
رمز التحديث: 20240603
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11139816
DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00736-6
PMID: 38816587
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2509-8020
DOI:10.1186/s41687-024-00736-6