دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: singleton vs. multiple distractors.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: singleton vs. multiple distractors.
المؤلفون: Smith ES; Centre for Ageing Research, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YF, England., Crawford TJ; Centre for Ageing Research, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YF, England. t.crawford@lancaster.ac.uk.
المصدر: Experimental brain research [Exp Brain Res] 2024 Jul; Vol. 242 (7), pp. 1745-1759. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 31.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer Verlag Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 0043312 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-1106 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00144819 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Exp Brain Res Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Berlin : Springer Verlag
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Attention*/physiology , Inhibition, Psychological*, Humans ; Male ; Young Adult ; Female ; Adult ; Reaction Time/physiology ; Photic Stimulation/methods ; Eye Movements/physiology ; Adolescent ; Visual Perception/physiology
مستخلص: In the complex interplay between sensory and cognitive processes, the brain must sift through a flood of sensory data to pinpoint relevant signals. This selective mechanism is crucial for the effective control of behaviour, by allowing organisms to focus on important tasks and blocking out distractions. The Inhibition of a Recent Distractor (IRD) Task examines this selection process by exploring how inhibiting distractors influences subsequent eye movements towards an object in the visual environment. In a series of experiments, research by Crawford et al. (2005a) demonstrated a delayed response to a target appearing at the location that was previously occupied by a distractor, demonstrating a legacy inhibition exerted by the distractor on the spatial location of the upcoming target. This study aimed to replicate this effect and to investigate any potential constraints when multiple distractors are presented. Exploring whether the effect is observed in more ecologically relevant scenarios with multiple distractors is crucial for assessing the extent to which it can be applied to a broader range of environments. Experiment 1 successfully replicated the effect, showing a significant IRD effect only with a single distractor. Experiments 2-5 explored a number of possible explanations for this phenomenon.
(© 2024. Crown.)
References: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct;28(5):1039-54. (PMID: 12421054)
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Oct;48(10):1420-1447. (PMID: 34516206)
Arch Neurol. 2012 Apr;69(4):509-17. (PMID: 22491196)
Vision Res. 2005 Dec;45(27):3365-78. (PMID: 16171841)
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Sep;152(9):2504-2519. (PMID: 37126051)
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 May;15(2):315-30. (PMID: 2525601)
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Aug;78(2):1108-19. (PMID: 9307138)
Vision (Basel). 2019 May 07;3(2):. (PMID: 31735818)
J Vis. 2022 Aug 1;22(9):3. (PMID: 35921089)
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. (PMID: 19897823)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 29;113(13):3693-8. (PMID: 26903654)
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20204. (PMID: 31882919)
J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 31;31(35):12501-12. (PMID: 21880912)
Vision Res. 2012 May 1;60:61-72. (PMID: 22469779)
J Neurophysiol. 2003 May;89(5):2577-90. (PMID: 12611995)
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0275738. (PMID: 36206239)
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Nov;85(8):2553-2566. (PMID: 36977905)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Mar 31;34(5):787-805. (PMID: 35104346)
Brain Behav. 2012 Jan;2(1):15-21. (PMID: 22574270)
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 May 1;57(9):1052-60. (PMID: 15860346)
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222. (PMID: 7605061)
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):81-9. (PMID: 21075358)
Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 Jan 08;12:66. (PMID: 30687026)
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Oct;191(1):117-22. (PMID: 18784920)
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Feb;208(3):385-97. (PMID: 21107543)
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Dec;232(12):3699-705. (PMID: 25106758)
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Nov 04;4:186. (PMID: 21119777)
Brain Behav Evol. 1989;33(2-3):90-4. (PMID: 2758308)
Vision Res. 2008 Dec;48(28):2805-16. (PMID: 18831984)
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):661-74; discussion 674-721. (PMID: 11301526)
Neuropsychol Rev. 2021 Dec;31(4):628-642. (PMID: 33742354)
Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58. (PMID: 2756067)
J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Feb 15;13(2):256-71. (PMID: 11244550)
J Vis. 2012 Nov 26;12(12):14. (PMID: 23184233)
Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):657-72. (PMID: 7808275)
Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):599-606. (PMID: 1620571)
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;97(1):229-37. (PMID: 16971677)
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1420-4. (PMID: 16624996)
Vision Res. 1978;18(10):1279-96. (PMID: 726270)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):129-35. (PMID: 22209601)
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:135-147. (PMID: 30856512)
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(1):1-12. (PMID: 25182738)
Exp Psychol. 2008;55(5):334-41. (PMID: 25116301)
Neurology. 2013 Oct 1;81(14):1235-43. (PMID: 23986300)
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(4):483-94. (PMID: 22936100)
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Jun 25;298(1089):187-98. (PMID: 6125970)
J Vis. 2003 Dec 29;3(11):877-92. (PMID: 14765969)
Brain Res. 2009 Nov 17;1298:92-8. (PMID: 19733156)
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Jun;32(2):193-227. (PMID: 33959887)
Psychophysiology. 2013 Feb;50(2):149-57. (PMID: 23241225)
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 24;8(1):15709. (PMID: 30356170)
J Vis. 2015;15(6):15. (PMID: 26024462)
Nature. 2003 Jan 23;421(6921):370-3. (PMID: 12540901)
Cortex. 2021 Sep;142:169-185. (PMID: 34271261)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Attention; Distractor; Inhibition; Inhibition of a recent distractor; Saccadic eye movement
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240531 Date Completed: 20240626 Latest Revision: 20240629
رمز التحديث: 20240629
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11208228
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06846-3
PMID: 38819649
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1432-1106
DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06846-3