دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

Alternatives to the P value: connotations of significance.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Alternatives to the P value: connotations of significance.
المؤلفون: In J; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea., Lee DK; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
المصدر: Korean journal of anesthesiology [Korean J Anesthesiol] 2024 Jun; Vol. 77 (3), pp. 316-325. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 29.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article; Review
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists Country of Publication: Korea (South) NLM ID: 101502451 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2005-7563 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20056419 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Korean J Anesthesiol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Seoul : Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Minimal Clinically Important Difference*, Humans ; Probability ; Research Design ; Clinical Trials as Topic/methods ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Confidence Intervals
مستخلص: The statistical significance of a clinical trial analysis result is determined by a mathematical calculation and probability based on null hypothesis significance testing. However, statistical significance does not always align with meaningful clinical effects; thus, assigning clinical relevance to statistical significance is unreasonable. A statistical result incorporating a clinically meaningful difference is a better approach to present statistical significance. Thus, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), which requires integrating minimum clinically relevant changes from the early stages of research design, has been introduced. As a follow-up to the previous statistical round article on P values, confidence intervals, and effect sizes, in this article, we present hands-on examples of MCID and various effect sizes and discuss the terms statistical significance and clinical relevance, including cautions regarding their use.
References: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jun;101(6):1090-1094. (PMID: 31953077)
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Sep 17;:942-948. (PMID: 30234667)
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15. (PMID: 2691207)
J Lipid Atheroscler. 2023 May;12(2):89-95. (PMID: 37265851)
Pain. 2000 Dec 1;88(3):287-294. (PMID: 11068116)
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1646-54. (PMID: 19369670)
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006 Mar;1(1):50-7. (PMID: 19114737)
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):379-84. (PMID: 16405133)
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):81-7. (PMID: 8283197)
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429. (PMID: 28186223)
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):29-33. (PMID: 15208174)
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S71-S75.e2. (PMID: 29567002)
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Sep;29(9):1428-1436. (PMID: 31149752)
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Apr;27(4):485-9. (PMID: 8604867)
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Dec;69(6):555-562. (PMID: 27924194)
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50. (PMID: 27209009)
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;22(10):781-91. (PMID: 25558501)
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;26(8):812-7. (PMID: 20848576)
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;45(12):1000-1005. (PMID: 32900985)
J Biopharm Stat. 2004 Feb;14(1):97-110. (PMID: 15027502)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Oct;50(10):2166-2176. (PMID: 29683920)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 May;60(5):448-55. (PMID: 17419955)
N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1839-54. (PMID: 12642637)
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;37(1):28-31. (PMID: 11145767)
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):610-618. (PMID: 33406353)
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Clinical relevance; Clinical significance; Confidence intervals; Effect size; Minimal clinically important difference; P value; Patient outcome assessment
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240605 Date Completed: 20240605 Latest Revision: 20240611
رمز التحديث: 20240611
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11150123
DOI: 10.4097/kja.23630
PMID: 38835136
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2005-7563
DOI:10.4097/kja.23630