دورية أكاديمية
Association between sex of the individual with untreated cleft lip and social judgement made by lay persons: A cross-sectional study.
| العنوان: | Association between sex of the individual with untreated cleft lip and social judgement made by lay persons: A cross-sectional study. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Maia ACDA; Department of Health I, School of Dentistry, Southwest Bahia State University, Jequié, Bahia, Brazil., Lima SOAS; Dental Surgeon Graduated from the Southwest Bahia State University, Jequié, Bahia, Brazil., Jural LA; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Moreira DC; Department of Health I, School of Dentistry, Southwest Bahia State University, Jequié, Bahia, Brazil., Maia LC; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil., Tanaka OM; Graduate Dentistry Program in Orthodontics, School of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil., Pithon MM; Department of Health I, School of Dentistry, Southwest Bahia State University, Jequié, Bahia, Brazil., Prado FO; Department of Health I, School of Dentistry, Southwest Bahia State University, Jequié, Bahia, Brazil. |
| المصدر: | Orthodontics & craniofacial research [Orthod Craniofac Res] 2024 Jun 10. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 10. |
| Publication Model: | Ahead of Print |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101144387 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1601-6343 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 16016335 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Orthod Craniofac Res Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Munksgaard, c2002- |
| مستخلص: | Objective: To assess whether there is an association between an individual's sex and social judgements made by lay persons regarding untreated cleft lip. Materials and Methods: Lay individuals over 18 years old were recruited through an application to respond online to two questionnaires: a sociodemographic survey and the Brazilian Version of Lay Persons' Social Judgements about Cleft-lip Scale (B-LSojCleft-S). B-LSojCleft-S comprises 14 items evaluating social judgements made by laypersons concerning different types of untreated cleft lips in teenagers. The 14 items are linked to 8 images featuring untreated cleft lips and 1 image without a cleft (control). Higher scores represented more favourable social judgements. Independent samples t-test, paired, and multiple linear regression were conducted (P < 0.05). The study assessed judgements of untreated cleft lips in male and female adolescents using the B-LSojCleft-S. Results: The mean age of the 217 participants was 37.78 ± 12.39 years, predominantly women (72.7%), married (47.7%), with a monthly income below three minimum wages (35.6%) in the majority of cases. Significantly higher social judgement scores were observed in the control group (no cleft) compared to any type of cleft (P < 0.001), with similar scores obtained for the same types of clefts with female or male images (P > 0.05). The participant's sex is associated with social judgement scores (F [1, 214] = 6.318, P = 0.013; adjusted R 2 = 0.024), with females making more favourable judgements than males (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Individuals with cleft lips receive more negative social judgement scores, regardless of their own sex. Women make better social judgements than men. (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.) |
| References: | Nasreddine G, El Hajj J, Ghassibe‐Sabbagh M. Orofacial clefts embryology, classification, epidemiology, and genetics. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2021;787:108373. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108373. Garib DG, Rosar JP, Sathler R, Ozawa TO. Dual embryonic origin of maxillary lateral incisors: clinical implications in patients with cleft lip and palate. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20(5):118‐125. doi:10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.118-125.sar. Mossey PA, Modell B. Epidemiology of oral clefts 2012: an international perspective. Front Oral Biol. 2012;16:1‐18. doi:10.1159/000337464. Angulo‐Castro E, Acosta‐Alfaro LF, Guadron‐Llanos AM, et al. Maternal risk factors associated with the development of cleft lip and cleft palate in Mexico: a case‐control study. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;29(93):189‐195. Candotto V, Oberti L, Gabrione F, et al. Current concepts on cleft lip and palate etiology. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019;33(3):145‐151. Dien VHA, McKinney CM, Pisek A, Pitiphat W. Maternal exposures and risk of oral clefts in South Vietnam. Birth Defects Res. 2018;110(6):527‐537. doi:10.1002/bdr2.1192. Aljohani M, Yates J, Ashley M, O'Malley L. Evaluation of quality of life in adult individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):505‐508. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007071. Kelly SN, Shearer J. Appearance and speech satisfaction and their associations with psychosocial difficulties among young people with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(8):1008‐1017. doi:10.1177/1055665620926083. Vyas T, Gupta P, Kumar S, Gupta R, Gupta T, Singh HP. Cleft of lip and palate: a review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(6):2621‐2625. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_472_20. Schwartz JP, Somensi DS, Yoshizaki P, et al. Prevalence of dental anomalies of number in different subphenotypes of isolated cleft palate. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014;19(1):55‐59. doi:10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.055-059.oar. Gkantidis N, Papamanou DA, Christou P, Topouzelis N. Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(7):e105‐e110. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.034. Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta‐analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(3):390‐423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390. Jamrozik A, Oraa Ali M, Sarwer DB, Chatterjee A. More than skin deep: judgments of individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts. 2019;13(1):117‐119. doi:10.1037/aca0000147. Zebrowitz LA, Hall JA, Murphy NA, Rhodes G. Looking smart and looking good: facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2002;28(2):238‐249. doi:10.1177/0146167202282009. Todorov A, Pakrashi M, Oosterhof NN. Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Soc Cogn. 2009;27(6):813‐833. doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813. Stewart LH, Ajina S, Getov S, Bahrami B, Todorov A, Rees G. Unconscious evaluation of faces on social dimensions. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012;141(4):715‐727. doi:10.1037/a0027950. Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, et al. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569‐624. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-X. Sousa GF, Roncalli AG. Orofacial clefts in Brazil and surgical rehabilitation under the Brazilian National Health System. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e23. doi:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.002327. Maia ACDA, Grimaldi DEDA, Jural LA, et al. Development and validation of the Brazilian version of lay persons' social judgements about cleft‐lip scale (B‐LSojCleft‐S). Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e086. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0086. Sutherland CA, Young AW, Mootz CA, Oldmeadow JA. Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: counter‐stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated. Br J Psychol. 2015;106(2):186‐208. doi:10.1111/bjop.12085. Tobiasen JM. Social judgments of facial deformity. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24(4):323‐327. Alighieri C, Haeghebaert Y, Bettens K, et al. Peer attitudes towards adolescents with speech disorders due to cleft lip and palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;165:111447. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111447. Sanders RA. Adolescent psychosocial, social, and cognitive development. Pediatr Rev. 2013;34(8):354‐359. doi:10.1542/pir.34-8-354. Gaete V. Desarrollo psicosocial del adolescente. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015;86(6):436‐443. doi:10.1016/j.rchipe.2015.07.005. Gifford‐Smith M, Dodge KA, Dishion TJ, McCord J. Peer influence in children and adolescents: crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2005;33(3):255‐265. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-3563-7. Quast A, Batschkus S, Brinkmann J, et al. Effect of cleft lip on adolescent evaluation of faces: an eye‐tracking study. Pediatr Dent. 2022;44(2):108‐113. Chung KY, Sorouri K, Wang L, Suryavanshi T, Fisher D. The impact of social stigma for children with cleft lip and/or palate in low‐resource areas: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(10):e2487. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002487. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806‐808. doi:10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. Herbert R, Jamtvedt G, Hagen KB, Mead J. Practical Evidence‐Based Physiotherapy—E‐Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011. Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ. Advanced statistics: bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with ‘difficult’ distributions. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(4):360‐365. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.018. Garrison LP Jr, Pauly MV, Willke RJ, Neumann PJ. An overview of value, perspective, and decision context‐a health economics approach: an ISPOR special task force report [2]. Value Health. 2018;21(2):124‐130. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.006. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473‐483. Sarwer DB, Siminoff LA, Gardiner HM, Spitzer JC. The psychosocial burden of visible disfigurement following traumatic injury. Front Psychol. 2022;13:979574. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.979574. Zhu S, Jayaraman J, Khambay B. Evaluation of facial appearance in patients with cleft lip and palate by laypeople and professionals: a systematic literature review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(2):187‐196. doi:10.1597/14-177. Wang TT, Wessels L, Hussain G, Merten S. Discriminative thresholds in facial asymmetry: a review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(4):375‐385. doi:10.1093/asj/sjw271. Hong S, Suk HW, Choi Y, Na J. Face‐based judgments: accuracy, validity, and a potential underlying mechanism. Psychol Sci. 2021;32(9):1452‐1462. doi:10.1177/09567976211000308. Willis J, Todorov A. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100‐ms exposure to a face. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(7):592‐598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x. Guimarães LK, Gasparello GG, Pithon MM, Bark MJ, Mota Júnior SL, Tanaka OM. Visual perception of repaired cleft lip scarring face associated with different malocclusions via eye‐tracking. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022;16(1):45‐52. doi:10.34172/joddd.2022.008. Al‐Chalabi MMM, Wan Sulaiman WA, Halim AS. Long‐term nasolabial appearance post‐unilateral cleft lip repair in a single center: a descriptive study. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e41683. doi:10.7759/cureus.41683. Bettens K, Alighieri C, Bruneel L, De Meulemeester L, Van Lierde K. Peer attitudes toward children with cleft (lip and) palate related to speech intelligibility, hypernasality and articulation. J Commun Disord. 2020;85:105991. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.105991. |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: adolescent; cleft lip; cross‐sectional studies; judgement; sex differences |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240611 Latest Revision: 20240611 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240611 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/ocr.12823 |
| PMID: | 38859693 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 1601-6343 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1111/ocr.12823 |