دورية أكاديمية
أعرض في EDS

What does 'co-production' look like for food system transformation? Mapping the evidence across Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) projects.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: What does 'co-production' look like for food system transformation? Mapping the evidence across Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) projects.
المؤلفون: Shaw N; School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK., Hardman CA; Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK., Boyle NB; School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK., Craven J; Independent Consultant, Exeter, UK., Dooley J; School of Agricultural Sciences and Practice, Royal Agricultural University, Cirencester, UK., Mead BR; Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK., Morgans L; School of Agricultural Sciences and Practice, Royal Agricultural University, Cirencester, UK., Mumby H; Independent Consultant, Exeter, UK., Pettinger C; School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
المصدر: Nutrition bulletin [Nutr Bull] 2024 Sep; Vol. 49 (3), pp. 345-359. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 13.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Published on behalf of the British Nutrition Foundation by Blackwell Publishing Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9315625 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1467-3010 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14673010 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Nutr Bull Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Oxford, UK : Published on behalf of the British Nutrition Foundation by Blackwell Publishing
Original Publication: London : British Nutrition Foundation
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Food Supply*/methods, United Kingdom ; Humans ; Stakeholder Participation ; Food Industry ; Nutrition Policy ; Research
مستخلص: Co-production is a collaborative way of working which emphasises the exchange of diverse forms of knowledge in an equal partnership for equal benefits. Co-produced research is a key strategic aim of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Transforming UK Food Systems (TUKFS) Strategic Priorities Fund; this research programme brings together researchers, policymakers, industry and communities to create positive change in the way food is produced, accessed and consumed. However, more generally, there are diverse understandings of co-production and a lack of consensus on what 'good practice' looks like. Therefore, this study aimed to identify and map examples of co-production methods employed across the TUKFS programme. Two creative workshops (n = 15 participants), conversations with TUKFS researchers and stakeholders (n = 15), and systematic analysis of project documents were used to critically explore co-production activities within six TUKFS projects. A range of co-production activities were identified. Findings highlighted areas of 'messiness' and complexity, challenges associated with applying co-production approaches and practical solutions. Four key shared principles for co-production were identified: (1) Relationships: developing and maintaining reciprocity-based partnerships; (2) Knowledge: recognising the contribution of diverse forms of expertise; (3) Power: considering power dynamics and addressing imbalances; and (4) Inclusivity: ensuring research is accessible to all who wish to participate. Opportunities for reflection and reflexivity were considered crucial across all these areas. Findings contribute important insights towards a shared conceptual understanding of co-production for food system transformation research. This paper makes recommendations for researchers, practitioners, academic institutions and funders working in this area of research and practice.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Nutrition Bulletin published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Nutrition Foundation.)
References: Andress, L., Hall, T., Davis, S., Levine, J., Cripps, K. & Guinn, D. (2020) Addressing power dynamics in community‐engaged research partnerships. Journal of Patient‐Reported Outcomes, 4, 24.
Arnold, D., Glässel, A., Böttger, T., Sarma, N., Bethmann, A. & Narimani, P. (2022) “What do you need? What are you experiencing?” relationship building and power dynamics in participatory research projects: critical self‐reflections of researchers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 9336.
Baungaard, C., Kok, K.P.W., Boer, A.C.L., Brierley, C., Meij, M.G., Gjefsen, M.D. et al. (2021) FIT4FOOD2030: future‐proofing Europe's FOOD systems with tools for transformation and a sustainable food systems network. Nutrition Bulletin, 46, 172–184.
Bhunnoo, R. & Poppy, G.M. (2020) A national approach for transformation of the UK food system. Nature Food, 1, 6–8.
Bogomolova, S., Carins, J., Dietrich, T., Bogomolov, T. & Dollman, J. (2021) Encouraging healthier choices in supermarkets: a co‐design approach. European Journal of Marketing, 55, 2439–2463.
Brooks, S., Leaver, A., Spence, M., Elliott, C.T. & Dean, M. (2017) Pragmatic engagement in a low trust supply chain: beef farmers' perceptions of power, trust and agency. Competition and Change, 21, 114–131.
Cachelin, A., Ivkovich, L., Jensen, P. & Neild, M. (2019) Leveraging foodways for health and justice. Local Environment, 24, 417–427.
Calla, S., Lécuyer, L., Skrimizea, E., Balian, E. & Young, J.C. (2022) Advancing food system transformation and addressing conflicts through transdisciplinary methodologies: strengths and limitations of the community voice method, T‐labs, film‐making and the miracle question. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 835203.
Caraher, M., Coveney, J. & Chopra, M. (Eds.). (2023) Handbook of food security and society. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Caraher, M., Furey, S. & Wells, R. (2023) Food policy in the United Kingdom: an introduction, Earthscan. London, UK: Routledge.
Carriedo, A., Walls, H. & Brown, K.A. (2022) Acknowledge the elephant in the room: the role of power dynamics in transforming food systems comment on “what opportunities exist for making the food supply nutrition friendly? A policy space analysis in Mexico”. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11, 3137–3140.
Chambers, J.M., Wyborn, C., Ryan, M.E., Reid, R.S., Riechers, M., Serban, A. et al. (2021) Six modes of co‐production for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4, 983–996.
Clark, T., Foster, L., Sloan, L. & Bryman, A. (2021) Bryman's social research methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Colistra, C., Bixler, R. & Schmalz, D. (2019) Exploring factors that contribute to relationship building in a community center. Journal of Leisure Research, 50, 1–17.
Co‐Production Collective. (2021) What is co‐production? Our approach. Available from: https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what‐is‐co‐production/our‐approach [Accessed 1 November 2023].
Co‐Production Collective. (2023) What does co‐production mean to us? Available from: https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what‐is‐co‐production/our‐approach [Accessed 17 November 2023].
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti‐Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. & Leip, A. (2021) Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food, 2, 198–209.
den Boer, A.C.L., Broerse, J.E.W. & Regeer, B.J. (2021) The need for capacity building to accelerate food system transformation. Current Opinion in Food Science, 42, 119–126.
den Boer, A.C.L., Kok, K.P.W., Gill, M., Breda, J., Cahill, J., Callenius, C. et al. (2021) Research and innovation as a catalyst for food system transformation. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 107, 150–156.
Dimbleby, H. (2022) National Food Strategy. Independent Review. The plan. Available from: https://www.nationalfoodstrategy.org/ [Accessed 19 April 2023].
Durose, C., Perry, B., Richardson, L. & Dean, R. (2023) Leadership and the hidden politics of co‐produced research: a Q‐methodology study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26, 1–21.
Facer, K. & Enright, B. (2016) Creating living knowledge. The Connected Communities Programme, community‐university relationships and the participatory turn in the production of knowledge. Available from: https://connected‐communities.org/wp‐content/uploads/2016/04/Creating‐Living‐Knowledge.Final_.pdf [Accessed 1 February 2024].
Farr, M., Davies, P., Andrews, H., Bagnall, D., Brangan, E. & Davies, R. (2021) Co‐producing knowledge in health and social care research: reflections on the challenges and ways to enable more equal relationships. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 105.
Fazey, I. & Colvin, J. (2023) Transformation: An introductory guide to fundamental change for researchers and change makers in a world of crises. Available from: https://ukfoodsystems.ukri.org/wp‐content/uploads/2023/08/Transformation.‐An‐introductory‐guide‐to‐fundamental‐change.pdf [Accessed 1 February 2024].
Fazey, I., Moug, P., Allen, S., Beckmann, K., Blackwood, D., Bonaventura, M. et al. (2018) Transformation in a changing climate: a research agenda. Climate and Development, 10, 197–217.
Flint, P., Pettinger, C., Schoen, V., Segal, R., Taylor, R., Wheeler, B. et al. (2017) Using the arts for food research and dialogue. Available from: https://foodresearch.org.uk/wp‐content/uploads/sites/8/2017/03/Using‐the‐Arts‐for‐Food‐Research‐and‐Dialogue‐FINAL‐.pdf [Accessed 19 December 2023].
Garcia‐Gonzalez, J. & Eakin, H. (2019) What can be: stakeholder perspectives for a sustainable food system. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 8, 61–82.
Gardiner, H. & Mantravadi, S. (2023) When worlds collide: Exploring tensions in co‐producing food system transformations with communities and industry. Available from: https://www.tabledebates.org/blog/when‐worlds‐collide [Accessed 5 February 2024].
Hasnain, S., Ingram, J. & Zurek, M. (2020) Mapping the UK Food System – a report for the UKRI Transforming UK Food Systems Programme. Available from: https://www.foodsecurity.ac.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2009/10/Mapping‐the‐UK‐food‐system‐digital.pdf [Accessed 1 February 2024].
House of Commons Library. (2022) Research Briefing. The effect of the war in Ukraine on UK farming and food production. Available from: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research‐briefings/cdp‐2022‐0147/ [Accessed 9 January 2024].
Howarth, C. & Monasterolo, I. (2017) Opportunities for knowledge co‐production across the energy‐food‐water nexus: making interdisciplinary approaches work for better climate decision making. Environmental Science & Policy, 75, 103–110.
Hunt, L., Pettinger, C. & Wagstaff, C. (2023) A critical exploration of the diets of UK disadvantaged communities to inform food systems transformation: a scoping review of qualitative literature using a social practice theory lens. BMC Public Health, 23, 1970.
IDeA. (2010) A glass half‐full: how an asset approach can improve community health and well‐being. Available from: https://www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/glass‐half‐full‐how‐asset‐3db.pdf.
Ingram, J. & Zurek, M. (2018) Chapter 16. Food systems approaches for the future. In: Serraj, R. & Pingali, P. (Eds.) Agriculture and food systems to 2050: global trends, challenges and opportunities. Singapore: World Scientific.
INVOLVE. (2019) Guidance on co‐producing a research project. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2019/04/Copro_Guidance_Feb19.pdf [Accessed 1 February 2024].
Jackson, P., Cameron, D., Rolfe, S., Dicks, L.V., Leake, J., Caton, S. et al. (2021) Healthy soil, healthy food, healthy people: an outline of the H3 project. Nutrition Bulletin, 46, 497–505.
Jones, A., Bridle, S., Denby, K., Bhunnoo, R., Morton, D., Stanbrough, L. et al. (2023) Scoping potential routes to UK civil unrest via the food system: results of a structured expert elicitation. Sustainability, 15, 14783.
Jones, P. (2022) Unncessary research bureaucracy is killing academic productivity, but it IS fixable. Available from: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/12/05/unnecessary‐research‐bureaucracy‐is‐killing‐academic‐productivity‐but‐it‐is‐fixable/ [Accessed 5 February 2022].
Kok, K.P.W., Gjefsen, M.D., Regeer, B.J. & Broerse, J.E.W. (2021) Unraveling the politics of ‘doing inclusion’ in transdisciplinarity for sustainable transformation. Sustainability Science, 16, 1811–1826.
Kreiling, L. & Paunov, C. (2021) Knowledge co‐creation in the 21st century: A cross‐country experience‐based policy report. Available from: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oec:stiaac:115‐en [Accessed 5 March 2024].
Largent, E.A. & Fernandez Lynch, H. (2017) Paying research participants: regulatory uncertainty, conceptual confusion, and a path forward. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 17, 61–141.
Leask, C.F., Sandlund, M., Skelton, D.A., Altenburg, T.M., Cardon, G., Chinapaw, M.J.M. et al. (2019) Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co‐creation and evaluation of public health interventions. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5, 2.
Liaison 2020. (2022) D3.4 Typology of interactive innovation project approaches. Available from: https://liaison2020.eu/wp‐content/uploads/2022/02/LIAISON‐Deliverable‐3.4‐Typology‐of‐interactive‐innovation‐project‐approaches.pdf [Accessed 1 February 2024].
Locock, L. & Boaz, A. (2019) Drawing straight lines along blurred boundaries: qualitative research, patient and public involvement in medical research, co‐production and co‐design. Evidence & Policy, 15, 409–421.
Lonnie, M., Hunter, E., Stone, R.A., Dineva, M., Aggreh, M., Greatwood, H. et al. (2023) Food insecurity in people living with obesity: improving sustainable and healthier food choices in the retail food environment‐the FIO food project. Nutrition Bulletin, 48, 390–399.
Marmot, M., Allen, J., Boyce, T., Goldblatt, P. & Morrison, J. (2020) Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/publications/reports/the‐marmot‐review‐10‐years‐on [Accessed 2 January 2024].
Masterson, D., Areskoug Josefsson, K., Robert, G., Nylander, E. & Kjellström, S. (2022) Mapping definitions of co‐production and co‐design in health and social care: a systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future. Health Expectations, 25, 902–913.
Maughan, C. & Anderson, C.R. (2023) “A shared human endeavor”: farmer participation and knowledge co‐production in agroecological research. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1162658.
McGill, B., Corbett, L., Grunseit, A.C., Irving, M. & O'Hara, B.J. (2022) Co‐produce, co‐design, co‐create, or co‐construct‐who does it and how is it done in chronic disease prevention? A Scoping Review. Healthcare, 10, 647.
Midgley, G. (2016) Co‐creation without systems thinking can be dangerous. Available from: https://i2insights.org/2016/07/07/co‐creation‐and‐systems‐thinking/ [Accessed 1 February 2024].
Minna, K., Jacobi, J., Korhonen‐Kurki, K., Lukkarinen, J.P., Ott, A., Peltomaa, J. et al. (2023) Reflexive use of methods: a framework for navigating different types of knowledge and power in transformative research. Sustainability Science, 19, 507–521.
Miro. (2024) Miro online whiteboard. Available from: https://miro.com/about/ [Accessed 16 January 2024].
Moore, K. & Swisher, M.E. (2015) The food movement: growing white privilege, diversity, or empowerment? Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 5, 115–119.
Morse, J.M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K. & Spiers, J. (2002) Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, 13–22.
Mumby, H. (2022) Co‐production oracle deck launch presentation. Available from: https://www.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/globalsystemsinstitute/documents/Co‐Production_Oracle_Card_Deck_Launch_Presentation_PDF.pdf [Accessed 17 November 2023].
N8 Research Partnership. (2016) Knowledge that matters: Realising the potential of co‐production. Available from: https://www.n8research.org.uk/research‐focus/legacy‐programmes/co‐production/ [Accessed 1 February 2024].
Nicholson, C. & Young, B. (2012) The relationship between supermarkets and suppliers: What are the implications for consumers? Available from: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/the_relationship_between_supermarkets_and_suppliers.pdf [Accessed 5 March 2024].
NIHR. (2019) Co‐production in action 2. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2019/11/Co‐production‐in‐action‐No2.pdf [Accessed 5 February 2024].
Norström, A.V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M.F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P. et al. (2020) Principles for knowledge co‐production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, 3, 182–190.
Ogutu, S.O., Ochieng, D.O. & Qaim, M. (2020) Supermarket contracts and smallholder farmers: implications for income and multidimensional poverty. Food Policy, 95, 101940.
OHID. (2023) Obesity Profile: short statistical commentary May 2023. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/obesity‐profile‐update‐may‐2023/obesity‐profile‐short‐statistical‐commentary‐may‐2023 [Accessed 2 January 2024].
Oliver, K., Kothari, A. & Mays, N. (2019) The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 33.
Parsons, K., Hawkes, C. & Wells, R. (2019) Brief 2: Understanding the food system: Why it matters for food policy. Available from: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/22795/ [Accessed 2 January 2024].
Pettinger, C., Hunt, L., Gardiner, H., Garg, P., Howard, L. & Wagstaff, C. (2023) Engaging with ‘less affluent’ communities for food system transformation: a community food researcher model (FoodSEqual project). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 1–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665123004913.
Pettinger, C., Letherby, G., Parsons, J.M., Withers, L., Cunningham, M., Whiteford, A. et al. (2018) Employing participatory methods to engage an under‐researched group: opportunities and challenges. Methodological Innovations, 11, 1–13.
Pettinger, C., Parsons, J.M., Letherby, G., Cunningham, M., Withers, L. & Whiteford, A. (2019) Participatory food events as collaborative public engagement opportunities. Methodological Innovations, 12, 1–14.
PHE. (2017) Health matters: obesity and the food environment. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health‐matters‐obesity‐and‐the‐food‐environment/health‐matters‐obesity‐and‐the‐food‐environment‐‐2#scale‐of‐the‐obesity‐problem [Accessed 2 January 2024].
Pope, H., de Frece, A., Wells, R., Borrelli, R., Ajates, R., Arnall, A. et al. (2021) Developing a functional food systems literacy for interdisciplinary dynamic learning networks. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 747627.
Richardson, L. (2014) Engaging the public in policy research: are community researchers the answer? Politics and Governance, 2, 13–44.
Rockström, J., Edenhofer, O., Gaertner, J. & DeClerck, F. (2020) Planet‐proofing the global food system. Nature Food, 1, 3–5.
Roe, E. & Buser, M. (2016) Becoming ecological citizens: connecting people through performance art, food matter and practices. Cultural Geographies, 23, 581–598.
Sanderson Bellamy, A., Furness, E., Nicol, P., Pitt, H. & Taherzadeh, A. (2021) Shaping more resilient and just food systems: lessons from the COVID‐19 pandemic. Ambio, 50, 782–793.
Schwarz, G., Vanni, F. & Miller, D. (2021) The role of transdisciplinary research in the transformation of food systems. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9, 35.
Sharp, E.L. (2019) Editorial: the role of reflexivity in care‐full food systems transformations. Policy Futures in Education, 17, 761–769.
Smith, B., Williams, O., Bone, L. & The Moving Social Work Co‐production Collective. (2023) Co‐production: a resource to guide co‐producing research in the sport, exercise, and health sciences. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15, 159–187.
Surmiak, A. (2020) Ethical concerns of paying cash to vulnerable participants: the qualitative researchers' view. The Qualitative Report, 25, 4461–4481.
Swain, J. & King, B. (2022) Using informal conversations in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221085056.
Thomas‐Hughes, H. (2018a) Critical conversations with community researchers: Making co‐production happen? Available from: https://research‐information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/critical‐conversations‐with‐community‐researchers‐making‐co‐produ [Accessed 8 February 2024].
Thomas‐Hughes, H. (2018b) Ethical ‘mess’ in co‐produced research: reflections from a U.K.‐based case study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21, 231–242.
Topi, C. (2022) Chapter 10. Stakeholder driven co‐creation of sustainable resilient climate smart solutions to minimise impacts and maximise benefits of the agrifood value chain. In: Waste to food: returning nutrients to the food chain. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 218–219.
TUKFS. (2023a) FIO‐FOOD, Food Insecurity In People Living With Obesity. Available from: https://ukfoodsystems.ukri.org/research‐projects‐training‐reports/fio‐food/ [Accessed 24 January 2024].
TUKFS. (2023b) FoodSEqual. Available from: https://ukfoodsystems.ukri.org/research‐projects‐training‐reports/food‐systems‐equality/ [Accessed 1 February 2024].
TUKFS. (2023c) Healthy Soil, Healthy Food, Healthy People (H3). Available from: https://ukfoodsystems.ukri.org/research‐projects‐training‐reports/h3/ [Accessed 24 January 2024].
TUKFS. (2023d) Is cultured meat a threat or opportunity for UK farmers? Available from: https://ukfoodsystems.ukri.org/research‐projects‐training‐reports/cultured‐meat/ [Accessed 1 February 2024].
TUKFS. (2023e) Thinking beyond the can: Mainstreaming UK‐grown beans in healthy meals (BeanMeals). Available from: https://ukfoodsystems.ukri.org/research‐projects‐training‐reports/thinking‐beyond‐the‐can/ [Accessed 24 January 2024].
TUKFS. (2023f) Transforming UK Food Systems Strategic Priorities Fund. About the programme. Available from: https://ukfoodsystems.ukri.org/about‐us/ [accessed 17 November 2023].
Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N. & Louder, E. (2020) The politics of co‐production: participation, power, and transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 15–21.
Utter, A., White, A., Méndez, V.E. & Morris, K. (2021) Co‐creation of knowledge in agroecology. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9, 1–26.
van Dijk, L., Buller, H.J., Blokhuis, H.J., van Niekerk, T., Voslarova, E., Manteca, X. et al. (2019) Hennovation: learnings from promoting practice‐led multi‐actor innovation networks to address complex animal welfare challenges within the laying hen industry. Animals, 9, 24.
Wheeler, B. (2018) Non‐prescribed spaces, creativity and narrative formation: a systems‐based examination of a community art group exploring food poverty. Ethnography and Education, 13, 359–376.
Williams, O., Sarre, S., Papoulias, S.C., Knowles, S., Robert, G., Beresford, P. et al. (2020) Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co‐production. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18, 43.
معلومات مُعتمدة: Synergy grant
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Co‐production; creative methods; food system transformation; participatory research; stakeholder participation
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240614 Date Completed: 20240813 Latest Revision: 20240813
رمز التحديث: 20240813
DOI: 10.1111/nbu.12690
PMID: 38872404
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1467-3010
DOI:10.1111/nbu.12690