دورية أكاديمية
Development of a quality of life measure for left ventricular assist device recipients using a mixed methods approach.
| العنوان: | Development of a quality of life measure for left ventricular assist device recipients using a mixed methods approach. |
|---|---|
| المؤلفون: | Slade AL; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., McMullan C; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.; National Institute for Health and Care Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.; National Institute for Health and Care Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., Haque MS; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., Griffith S; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK., Marley L; University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK., Quinn D; University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK., O'Hara ME; University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK., Horton M; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.; Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK., Calvert MJ; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.; National Institute for Health and Care Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.; National Institute for Health and Care Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Birmingham, UK., Lim HS; University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK., Lane DA; Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. |
| المصدر: | ESC heart failure [ESC Heart Fail] 2024 Jun 14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 14. |
| Publication Model: | Ahead of Print |
| نوع المنشور: | Journal Article |
| اللغة: | English |
| بيانات الدورية: | Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101669191 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2055-5822 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20555822 NLM ISO Abbreviation: ESC Heart Fail Subsets: MEDLINE |
| أسماء مطبوعة: | Original Publication: [Oxford] : John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology, [2014]- |
| مستخلص: | Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients report symptom improvement but find adjusting to life with the LVAD challenging. These challenges are unique, and existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) do not reflect their experiences. This study aimed to develop a culturally relevant quality of life PROM for use with LVAD recipients in future research, design evolutions and clinical practice. Methods: A three-stage mixed-methods approach was used to develop a PROM: stage 1 included group concept mapping (GCM); stage 2 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 LVAD recipients and 10 clinicians, and a questionnaire was developed using a conceptual framework; and stage 3 used exploratory psychometric analysis of the PROM data using Rasch measurement theory. This paper presents stages 2 and 3. Results: The conceptual framework consisted of four key concepts, including general health, life with the LVAD, equipment and clothing and emotional impact. Statements from interviews and GCM were used to create items for the LVAD quality of life (LVAD-QoL). Cognitive interviews tested face validity and participant comprehension. Forty-nine participants were recruited from three UK transplant centres. PROM data were collected and analysed using Rasch analysis. Four items displayed misfit; dependency between item sets was the biggest issue (57/485 pairwise differences). After restructuring and dealing with item misfit, the LVAD-QoL conformed to the Rasch model, supporting the psychometric properties and quality of the LVAD-QoL. Conclusions: Using a mixed-methods approach ensured the development of a robust and psychometrically sound tool for research, design evolution and clinical practice with LVAD recipients. (© 2024 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.) |
| References: | Savarese G, Luns LH. Global public health burden of heart failure. Card Fail Rev 2017;3:7‐11. doi:10.15420/cfr.2016:25:2. Calvert MJ, Freemantle N, Cleland JGF. The impact of chronic heart failure on health‐related quality of life data acquired in the baseline phase of the CARE‐HF study. Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:243‐251. den Exter PL, Beeres SLMA, Eikenboom J, Klok FA, Huisman MV. Anticoagulant treatment and bleeding complications in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2020;18:363‐372. doi:10.1080/14779072.2020.1773803. Brouwers C, Denollet J, de Jonge N, Caliskan K, Kealy J, Pedersen SS. Patient‐reported outcomes in left ventricular assist device therapy. A systematic review and recommendations for clinical research and practice. Circ Heart Fail 2011;4:714‐723. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.962472. Slade AL, O'Hara ME, Quinn D, Marley L, Griffith S, Calvert M, et al. Living with a left ventricular assist device: Capturing recipients experiences using group concept mapping software. PLoS ONE 2022;17:e0273108. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273108. Friedman JA. Experiences of left ventricular assist device‐destination therapy recipients: A systematic review and meta‐synthesis. Heart Lung 2020;49:463‐474. Itzhaki Ben Zadok O, Ben‐Avraham B, Jaarsma T, Shaul A, Hammer Y, Barac YD, et al. Health‐related quality of life in left ventricular assist device‐supported patients. ESC Heart Fail 2021;8:2036‐2044. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13282. Kornowski R. Patient‐reported outcome measures in cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021;9:119‐127. doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab051. Hjollund INH, Larsen PL, Biering K, Johnsen PS, Riiskjær E, Schougaard ML. Use of patient‐reported outcome (PRO) measures at group and patient levels: Experiences from the generic integrated PRO system, WestChronic. Interact J Med Res 2014;3:e5. doi:10.2196/ijmr.2885. Jensen RE, Rothrock NE, DeWitt EM, Spiegel B, Tucker CA, Crane HM, et al. The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient‐reported outcomes in clinical care. Med Care 2015;53:153‐159. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000289. FDA. In: Administration USDoHaHSFaD, ed. Use of Real‐World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision‐Making for Medical Devices, Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development (OCOD); 2017:24. Retzer A, Aiyegbusi OL, Rowe A, Newsome PN, Douglas‐Pugh J, Khan S, et al. The value of patient‐reported outcomes in early‐phase clinical trials. Nat Med 2022;28:18‐20. doi:10.1038/s41591‐021‐01648‐4. Rathod KS, Wragg A. Do patient‐reported outcome measures speak for all patient subgroups: Is everyone included? Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2018;4:79‐80. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, et al. Content validity—Establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 1—Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health 2011;14:967‐977. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014. Sandau K, Lee C, Faulkner KM, Pozehl B, Eckman P, Garberich R, et al. Health‐related quality of life in patients with a left ventricular assist device (QOLVAD) questionnaire: Initial psychometrics of a new instrument. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2021;36:172‐184. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000774. Sandau K, Hoglund B, Weaver C. A conceptual definition of quality of life with a left ventricular assist device: Results from a qualitative study. Heart Lung: J Acute Crit Care 2014;43:32‐40. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.09.004. Groupwisdom™. Group Wisdom. Itacha, NY: Concept Systems Inc.; 2019. Available from: https://groupwisdom.com/. Accessed 11 August 2023. Trochim WM, McLinden D. Introduction to a special issue on concept mapping. Eval Program Plann 2017;60:166‐175. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.006. Rosas SR, Ridings JW. The use of concept mapping in measurement development and evaluation: Application and future directions. Eval Program Plann 2017;60:265‐276. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.016. Velozo CA, Seel RT, Magasi S, Heinemann AW, Romero S. Improving measurement methods in rehabilitation: Core concepts and recommendations for scale development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:S154‐S163. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.001. LUMIVERO. NVivo 14. Denver: LUMIVERO; 2023. Available from: https://lumivero.com/products/nvivo/. Accessed 14 May 2024. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, et al. Content validity—Establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2—Assessing respondent understanding. Value Health 2011;14:978‐988. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377‐381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Andrich D. Rasch Models for Measurement. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications; 1988. Rasch G. In: Danish Institute for Educational Research TUoCP, ed. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen, Chicago: Danish Institute for Educational Research, The University of Chicago Press; 1960/1980. Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care Res 2007;57:1358‐1362. Sheridan B, Andrich D. RUMM2030. Perth, Australia: RUMMLAB Pty Ltd; 2023. Available from: https://www.rummlab.com.au/. Accessed 11 August 2023. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ 1997;314:572. Barrett L, Elliott E, Voorhaar M, Ingelgård A, Griebsch I, Wong B, et al. A mixed‐methods study to better measure patient‐reported pain and fatigue in soft tissue sarcoma. Oncol Ther 2023;11:129‐143. doi:10.1007/s40487‐022‐00219‐y. Linacre MJ. Sample size and item calibration (or person measure) stability: Rasch measurement transaction. 1994. Available from: https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt74m.htm. Accessed 14 May 2024. Christensen KB, Makransky G, Horton M. Critical values for Yen's Q(3): Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Appl Psychol Measur 2017;41:178‐194. doi:10.1177/0146621616677520. Tennant A, Kucukdeveci AA. Application of the Rasch measurement model in rehabilitation research and practice: Early developments, current practice and future challenges. Front Rehabil Sci 2023;4:4. Aditya AJ, Lerman JB, Sajja AP, Dahiya G, Gokhale AV, Dey AK, et al. Sex‐based differences in left ventricular assist device utilization: Insights from the nationwide inpatient sample 2004 to 2016. Circ: Heart Fail 2019;12:e006082. doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006082. |
| معلومات مُعتمدة: | PG/18/58/33944 United Kingdom BHF_ British Heart Foundation |
| فهرسة مساهمة: | Keywords: Rasch analysis; health‐related quality of life; heart failure; left ventricular assist device; patient‐reported outcomes |
| تواريخ الأحداث: | Date Created: 20240614 Latest Revision: 20240614 |
| رمز التحديث: | 20240614 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/ehf2.14850 |
| PMID: | 38873750 |
| قاعدة البيانات: | MEDLINE |
Full Text Finder | تدمد: | 2055-5822 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1002/ehf2.14850 |