دورية أكاديمية

Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.
المؤلفون: Gunduz ME; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Cologne, Germany., Matis GK, Ozduran E, Hanci V
المصدر: Turkish neurosurgery [Turk Neurosurg] 2024; Vol. 34 (4), pp. 588-599.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Turkish Neurosurgi[c]al Society Country of Publication: Turkey NLM ID: 9423821 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2651-5032 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10195149 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Turk Neurosurg Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Ankara, Turkey : Turkish Neurosurgi[c]al Society,
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Internet* , Patient Education as Topic*/standards , Patient Education as Topic*/methods , Comprehension* , Spinal Cord Stimulation*/methods , Spinal Cord Stimulation*/standards, Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Health Literacy/standards
مستخلص: Aim: To obtain health-related information internet usage is rapidly increasing. However, there are concerns about the comprehensibility and reliability of internet-accessed health-related information. The aim of this research was to investigate the reliability, quality, and readability of patient education materials (PEMs) about spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the internet.
Material and Methods: A total of 114 websites suitable for the study were identified after a search on Google for the term "spinal cord stimulation." Gunning Fog (GFOG), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) were used to determine the readability of sites. The credibility of the websites was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score. Quality was assessed using the global quality score (GQS), the DISCERN score, and the Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct (HONcode).
Results: Evaluating the text sections, the mean SMOG and FKGL were 10.92 ± 1.61 and 11.62 ± 2.11 years, respectively, and the mean FRES and GFOG were 45.32 ± 10.71 and 14.62 ± 2.24 (both very difficult), respectively. Of all the websites, 10.5% were found to be of high quality, 13.2% were found to be of high reliability, and only 6.1% had a HONcode. A significant difference was found between the typologies of the websites and the reliability and quality scores (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The internet-based PEMs about SCS were found to have a readability level that exceeded the Grade 6 level recommended by the National Health Institute. However, the materials demonstrated low reliability and poor quality. It is advisable that websites addressing Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), a specific neuromodulation technique among various interventional strategies for chronic pain management, maintain readability standards in line with established indexes and provide content that is reliable and tailored to the general public's educational level.
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240614 Date Completed: 20240707 Latest Revision: 20240707
رمز التحديث: 20240707
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.42973-22.3
PMID: 38874237
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:2651-5032
DOI:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.42973-22.3