دورية أكاديمية

Cost-effectiveness and benefits of perinatal health interventions in high-income settings: A protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Cost-effectiveness and benefits of perinatal health interventions in high-income settings: A protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluations.
المؤلفون: Haile TG; Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.; Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia., Tessema GA; Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.; enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.; School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia., Hertzog L; Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Newnham E; Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.; enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Dachew BA; Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.; enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Makate M; Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
المصدر: PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 Jul 02; Vol. 19 (7), pp. e0306557. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 02 (Print Publication: 2024).
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Cost-Benefit Analysis*/methods , Systematic Reviews as Topic*, Humans ; Pregnancy ; Female ; Perinatal Care/economics ; Developed Countries/economics
مستخلص: Background: Despite ongoing efforts, perinatal morbidity and mortality persist across all settings, imposing a dual burden of clinical and economic strain. Besides, the fragmented nature of economic evidence on perinatal health interventions hinders the formulation of effective health policies. Our review aims to comprehensively and critically assess the economic evidence for such interventions in high-income countries, where the balance of health outcomes and fiscal prudence is paramount.
Methods and Analysis: We will conduct a comprehensive search for studies using databases including EconLit (EBSCO), Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCO), Global Health (Ovid), and PubMed. Furthermore, we will broaden our search to include Google Scholar and conduct snowballing from the final articles included. The search terms will encompass economic evaluation, perinatal health interventions, morbidity and mortality, and high-income countries. We will include full economic evaluations focusing on cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost-utility, and cost-minimisation analyses. We will exclude partial economic evaluations, reports, qualitative studies, conference papers, editorials, and systematic reviews. Date restrictions will limit the review to studies published after 2010 and those in English during the study selection process. We will use the modified Drummond checklist to evaluate the quality of each included study. Our findings will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. A summary will include estimated costs, effectiveness, benefits, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We also plan to conduct a subgroup analysis. To aid comparability, we will standardise all costs to the United States Dollar, adjusting them to their 2022 value using country-specific consumer price index and purchasing power parity.
Ethics and Dissemination: This systematic review will not involve human participants and requires no ethical approval. We will publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal.
Trial Registration: We registered our record on PROSPERO (registration #: CRD42023432232).
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2024 Haile et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
References: Arch Dis Child. 2015 Feb;100 Suppl 1:S76-81. (PMID: 25613979)
BJOG. 2024 Aug;131(9):e31-e80. (PMID: 38740546)
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 11;9(7):e101112. (PMID: 25013954)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;216(3):B11-B13. (PMID: 28126367)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;216(2):121-128.e2. (PMID: 27810551)
Birth. 2020 Jun;47(2):183-190. (PMID: 31737924)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:217-224. (PMID: 28068594)
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Apr 05;14:93. (PMID: 24708755)
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;150(1):31-33. (PMID: 32524596)
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):604-616. (PMID: 26794073)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 01;15:188. (PMID: 26323522)
Am J Nurs. 2014 Apr;114(4):53-6. (PMID: 24681476)
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):7. (PMID: 31931747)
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. (PMID: 33789826)
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240702 Date Completed: 20240702 Latest Revision: 20240807
رمز التحديث: 20240808
مُعرف محوري في PubMed: PMC11218939
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306557
PMID: 38954703
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0306557