An app promoting weight gain prevention via healthy behaviours amongst young women with a family history of breast cancer: Acceptability and usability assessment.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان:	An app promoting weight gain prevention via healthy behaviours amongst young women with a family history of breast cancer: Acceptability and usability assessment.
المؤلفون:	Pegington M; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK., Hawkes RE; Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Davies A; Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Mueller J; MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK., Howell A; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.; Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Gareth Evans D; The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.; Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK., Howell SJ; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.; Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK., French DP; Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Harvie M; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.; Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
المصدر:	Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association [J Hum Nutr Diet] 2024 Jul 14. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 14.
Publication Model:	Ahead of Print
نوع المنشور:	Journal Article
اللغة:	English
بيانات الدورية:	Publisher: Wiley on behalf of The British Dietetic Association Ltd., [c1988- Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8904840 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1365-277X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09523871 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Hum Nutr Diet Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة:	Original Publication: [Oxford] : Wiley on behalf of The British Dietetic Association Ltd., [c1988-
مستخلص:	Background: Breast cancer is the most frequent female malignancy in the UK. Around 20% of cases are linked to weight gain, excess weight and health behaviours. We designed a weight gain prevention, health behaviour intervention for young women at increased risk. Methods: The study comprised a single arm observational study over 2 months testing acceptability and usability of the intervention: online group welcome event, app and private Facebook group. Females aged 18-35 years at moderate or high risk of breast cancer (>17% lifetime risk) were recruited via invite letters and social media posts. The app included behaviour change techniques and education content. Online questionnaires were completed at baseline, as well as at 1 and 2 months. We also assessed feasibility of study procedures. Results: Both recruitment methods were successful. Thirty-five women were recruited, 26% via social media posts. Median age was 33 (interquartile range = 28.2-34.5) years, the majority (94.1%) were of White ethnicity. Thirty-four participants were included in the analyses, of which 94% downloaded the app. Median self-monitoring logs per participant during the study period was 10.0 (interquartile range = 4.8-28.8). App quality mean (SD) score was 3.7 (0.6) at 1 and 2 months (scale: 1-5). Eighty-nine per cent rated the app at average or above at 1 month and 75.0% at 2 months. Nineteen women (55.9%) joined the Facebook group and there were 61 comments and 83 reactions and votes from participants during the study period. Conclusions: This first iteration of the app and intervention was well received and is suitable to progress to the next stage of refining and further testing. (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Dietetic Association.)
References:	Cancer Research UK. Breast cancer incidence (invasive) statistics. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 7]. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer/incidence-invasive. Maddams J, Utley M, Møller H. Projections of cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom, 2010‐2040. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(7):1195–1202. Brown KF, Rumgay H, Dunlop C, Ryan M, Quartly F, Cox A, et al. The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015. Br J Cancer. 2018;118(8):1130–1141. World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and breast cancer. 2018. Park HA, Neumeyer S, Michailidou K, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Dennis J, et al. Mendelian randomisation study of smoking exposure in relation to breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 2021;125(8):1135–1145. Gramling R, Lash TL, Rothman KJ, Cabral HJ, Silliman R, Roberts M, et al. Family history of later‐onset breast cancer, breast healthy behavior and invasive breast cancer among postmenopausal women: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(5):R82. Hopper JL, Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Liao Y, Zeinomar N, Knight JA, et al. Age‐specific breast cancer risk by body mass index and familial risk: prospective family study cohort (ProF‐SC). Breast Cancer Res. 2018;20(1):132. Kehm RD, Genkinger JM, MacInnis RJ, John EM, Phillips KA, Dite GS, et al. Recreational physical activity is associated with reduced breast cancer risk in adult women at high risk for breast cancer: a cohort study of women selected for familial and genetic risk. Cancer Res. 2020;80(1):116–125. Petimar J, Park Y‐MM, Smith‐Warner SA, Fung TT, Sandler DP. Dietary index scores and invasive breast cancer risk among women with a family history of breast cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(5):1393–1401. Brentnall AR, van Veen EM, Harkness EF, Rafiq S, Byers H, Astley SM, et al. A case‐control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic density. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(8):2122–2129. Evans DGR, Van Veen EM, Harkness EF, Brentnall AR, Astley SM, Byers H, et al. Breast cancer risk stratification in women of screening age: incremental effects of adding mammographic density, polygenic risk, and a gene panel. Genet Med. 2022;24(7):1485–1494. Pegington M, Evans DG, Howell A, Donnelly LS, Wiseman J, Cuzick JM, et al. Lifestyle behaviours and health measures of women at increased risk of breast cancer taking chemoprevention. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2019;28(6):500–506. NICE. Clinical guideline CG164. Familial breast cancer classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. NICE; 2013. Pegington M, French DP, Harvie MN. Why young women gain weight: a narrative review of influencing factors and possible solutions. Obes Rev. 2020;21(5):e13002. Busetto L, Bettini S, Makaronidis J, Roberts CA, Halford JCG, Batterham RL. Mechanisms of weight regain. Eur J Intern Med. 2021;93:3–7. Pegington M, Davies A, Mueller J, Cholerton R, Howell A, Evans DG, et al. Evaluating the acceptance and usability of an app promoting weight gain prevention and healthy behaviors among young women with a family history of breast cancer: protocol for an observational study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022;11(12):e41246. Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57(4):660–680. Yardley L, Ainsworth B, Arden‐Close E, Muller I. The person‐based approach to enhancing the acceptability and feasibility of interventions. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1:37. Yardley L, Morrison L, Bradbury K, Muller I. The person‐based approach to intervention development: application to digital health‐related behavior change interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e30. Hewitt RM, Pegington M, Harvie M, French DP. How acceptable is a weight maintenance programme for healthy weight young women who are at increased risk of breast cancer? Psychol Health. 2020;35(7):854–871. Harvey N, Holmes CA. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(2):188–194. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. Evidence standards framework for digital health technologies (updated 2021). National Institute of Health and Care Excellence; 2018. Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. doi:10.1136/bmjn2061. Evans DG, Astley S, Stavrinos P, Harkness E, Donnelly LS, Dawe S, et al. Improvement in risk prediction, early detection and prevention of breast cancer in the NHS Breast Screening Programme and family history clinics: a dual cohort study. Programme Grants Appl Res. 2016;4(11). https://doi.org/10.3310/pgfar04110. Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med. 2004;23(7):1111–1130. Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. IBIS online Tyrer‐Cuzick model brest cancer risk evaluation tool. [Version 8 B on line calculator]. Available from: https://ibis.ikonopedia.com/. Brentnall AR, Cuzick J. Risk models for breast cancer and their validation. Stat Sci. 2020;35(1):14–30. Ashton LM, Sharkey T, Whatnall MC, Haslam RL, Bezzina A, Aguiar EJ, et al. Which behaviour change techniques within interventions to prevent weight gain and/or initiate weight loss improve adiposity outcomes in young adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2020;21(6):e13009. Hebden L, Chey T, Allman‐Farinelli M. Lifestyle intervention for preventing weight gain in young adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of RCTs. Obes Rev. 2012;13(8):692–710. Laska MN, Pelletier JE, Larson NI, Story M. Interventions for weight gain prevention during the transition to young adulthood: a review of the literature. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(4):324–333. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta‐regression. Health Psychol. 2009;28(6):690–701. Epton T, Currie S, Armitage CJ. Unique effects of setting goals on behavior change: systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017;85(12):1182–1198. Villinger K, Wahl DR, Boeing H, Schupp HT, Renner B. The effectiveness of app‐based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviours and nutrition‐related health outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obes Rev. 2019;20(10):1465–1484. Carlo AD, Hosseini Ghomi R, Renn BN, Strong MA, Areán PA. Assessment of real‐world use of behavioral health mobile applications by a novel stickiness metric. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2011978. Williams SL, French DP. What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self‐efficacy and physical activity behaviour—and are they the same? Health Educ Res. 2011;26(2):308–322. Kennedy M, Kumar R, Ryan NM, Bennett J, La Hera Fuentes G, Gould GS. Codeveloping a multibehavioural mobile phone app to enhance social and emotional well‐being and reduce health risks among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women during preconception and pregnancy: a three‐phased mixed‐methods study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):e052545. Office for National Statistics. England and Wales 2011 Census. 2018 [cited 2022 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census. Martínez‐González MA, Fernández‐Jarne E, Serrano‐Martínez M, Wright M, Gomez‐Gracia E. Development of a short dietary intake questionnaire for the quantitative estimation of adherence to a cardioprotective Mediterranean diet. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58(11):1550–1552. Office for National Statistics. Postcode Directories: UK data service census support. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 17]. Available from: https://geoconvert.ukdataservice.ac.uk/. World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. [WHO technical report series: 854]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995. NHS Digital. Health survey for England 2019. 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 17]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2019. Begum P, Richardson CE, Carmichael AR. Obesity in post menopausal women with a family history of breast cancer: prevalence and risk awareness. Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2009;6:1. Anderson AS, Caswell S, Macleod M, Steele RJ, Berg J, Dunlop J, et al. Health behaviors and their relationship with disease control in people attending genetic clinics with a family history of breast or colorectal cancer. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(1):40–51. Lambrecht A, Vuillerme N, Raab C, Simon D, Messner EM, Hagen M, et al. Quality of a supporting mobile app for rheumatic patients: patient‐based assessment using the user version of the mobile application scale (uMARS). Front Med. 2021;8:715345. Welch WA, Solk P, Auster‐Gussman L, Gavin KL, Whitaker M, Cullather E, et al. User‐centered development of a smartphone application (Fit2Thrive) to promote physical activity in breast cancer survivors. Transl Behav Med. 2022;12(2):203–213. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350(6):h1258. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016;355:i5239. Lancaster GA, Thabane L. Guidelines for reporting non‐randomised pilot and feasibility studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5(1):114.
معلومات مُعتمدة:	Medical Research Centre; National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
فهرسة مساهمة:	Keywords: BMI; acceptability; app; breast cancer; feasibility; health behaviour
تواريخ الأحداث:	Date Created: 20240715 Latest Revision: 20240715
رمز التحديث:	20240715
DOI:	10.1111/jhn.13347
PMID:	39004937
قاعدة البيانات:	MEDLINE

View record at Wiley

Full Text Finder

الوصف
تدمد:	1365-277X
DOI:	10.1111/jhn.13347