دورية أكاديمية

Disentangling autonomy-supportive and psychologically controlling parenting: A meta-analysis of self-determination theory's dual process model across cultures.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Disentangling autonomy-supportive and psychologically controlling parenting: A meta-analysis of self-determination theory's dual process model across cultures.
المؤلفون: Bradshaw EL; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University., Duineveld JJ; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University., Conigrave JH; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University., Steward BA; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University., Ferber KA; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University., Joussemet M; Department of Psychology, Universite de Montreal., Parker PD; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University., Ryan RM; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.
المصدر: The American psychologist [Am Psychol] 2024 Jul 25. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 25.
Publication Model: Ahead of Print
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: American Psychological Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0370521 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1935-990X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0003066X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Am Psychol Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Original Publication: Washington, DC : American Psychological Association
مستخلص: Self-determination theory's (SDT) dual process model claims that parental autonomy support relates positively to child well-being, while psychologically controlling parenting is linked positively to child ill-being. We tested these claims using a combination of one-stage and univariate meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderation ( k = 238; n = 1,040, N = 126,423). In the univariate models, parental autonomy support was linked positively with child well-being, r = 0.30, 95% CI [0.26, 0.33], whereas parental psychological control was positively linked with child ill-being, r = 0.26, 95% CI [0.23, 0.28]. Consistent with SDT's dual process model, the one-stage model that controlled for the intercorrelations between predictors showed that parental autonomy support and psychological control had distinct links to child wellness outcomes. Parental autonomy support was linked positively with child well-being, even when accounting for psychological control, r = 0.26, 95% CI [0.20, 0.31], and parental psychological control was positively linked to child ill-being, controlling for autonomy support, r = 0.20, 95% CI [0.17, 0.23]. Crucially, the beneficial effects of parental autonomy support and the costs of psychological control applied across regions, degrees of national individualism and cultural hierarchy, as well as child developmental periods and sexes. These results help move the field beyond debates about whether autonomy is beneficial toward questions about manifestations of autonomy across groups and variations in its optimal support. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240725 Latest Revision: 20240725
رمز التحديث: 20240726
DOI: 10.1037/amp0001389
PMID: 39052356
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1935-990X
DOI:10.1037/amp0001389