دورية أكاديمية

Expression of artefacts from different orthodontic brackets and wires in cone beam computed tomography scans-an in vitro study.

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
العنوان: Expression of artefacts from different orthodontic brackets and wires in cone beam computed tomography scans-an in vitro study.
المؤلفون: Troca BS; School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alfenas (Unifal-MG), Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil., Felizardo HMA; School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alfenas (Unifal-MG), Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil., Gaêta-Araujo H; School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alfenas (Unifal-MG), Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. hugogaeta@hotmail.com.; Department of Stomatology, Public Health, and Forensic Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (USP), Av. do Café, s/n, Campus da USP, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil. hugogaeta@hotmail.com.
المصدر: Clinical oral investigations [Clin Oral Investig] 2024 Jul 26; Vol. 28 (8), pp. 450. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 26.
نوع المنشور: Journal Article
اللغة: English
بيانات الدورية: Publisher: Springer-Verlag Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9707115 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1436-3771 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14326981 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Oral Investig Subsets: MEDLINE
أسماء مطبوعة: Publication: Berlin : Springer-Verlag
Original Publication: Berlin : Springer, c1997-
مواضيع طبية MeSH: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography* , Artifacts* , Orthodontic Brackets* , Orthodontic Wires*, Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Ceramics/chemistry
مستخلص: Objectives: To investigate artefacts produced by different orthodontic brackets and wires in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.
Materials and Methods: Two dental arches were made using extracted human teeth and plaster. Three pairs of acetate plates containing different brackets - metallic, ceramic, and self-ligating ceramic with NiTi clip - along with a control plate (i.e., without brackets) were prepared. Wire changes (NiTi and steel) were made during CBCT acquisitions, performed with a fixed exposure protocol. Axial slices were selected for mean gray values and standard deviation measurement in three regions of interest (buccal, lingual, and tooth). Noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated and compared among the different brackets and wires by ANOVA with a significance level of 5%.
Results: Overall, the buccal and tooth region were mostly affected by the metallic and self-ligating brackets, showing higher noise, and lower CNR (p < 0.05). On the other hand, less impact of ceramic brackets in the image quality was observed (p ≥ 0.05). The lingual region did not show expressive differences among the brackets and wire combinations (p ≥ 0.05). The presence of wire associated with the brackets did not worsen image quality (p ≥ 0.05).
Conclusions: In conclusion, metallic and self-ligating brackets have greater artefact expression than ceramic brackets. The wire did not influence image quality.
Clinical Relevance: One should pay attention to the type of brackets when requesting a CBCT scan during treatment, as metallic and self-ligating brackets may express greater artefacts than ceramic brackets.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
References: Scarfe WC, Azevedo B, Toghyani S, Farman AG (2017) Cone Beam Computed Tomographic imaging in orthodontics. Aust Dent J 62:33–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12479. (PMID: 10.1111/adj.1247928297089)
Schulze R, Heil U, Groß D et al (2011) Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 40:265–273. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30642039. (PMID: 10.1259/dmfr/30642039)
Hirschinger V, Hanke S, Hirschfelder U, Hofmann E (2015) Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. J Orofac Orthop / Fortschr Der Kieferorthopädie 76:152–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0278-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s00056-014-0278-9)
Gaêta-Araujo H, Nascimento EHL, Fontenele RC et al (2020) Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on conebeam computed tomography with varying tube current. Imaging Sci Dent 50:1–7. https://doi.org/10.5624/ISD.2020.50.1.1. (PMID: 10.5624/ISD.2020.50.1.1322066147078413)
Fontenele RC, Nascimento EH, Vasconcelos TV et al (2018) Magnitude of cone beam CT image artifacts related to zirconium and titanium implants: impact on image quality. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 47:20180021. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180021. (PMID: 10.1259/dmfr.20180021)
Mancini AXM, Santos MUC, Gaêta-Araujo H et al (2021) Artefacts at different distances from titanium and zirconia implants in cone-beam computed tomography: effect of tube current and metal artefact reduction. Clin Oral Investig 25:5087–5094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03821-y. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-021-03821-y33544197)
Sanders MA, Hoyjberg C, Chu CB et al (2007) Common orthodontic appliances cause artifacts that degrade the diagnostic quality of CBCT images. J Calif Dent Assoc 35:850–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2007.12221294. (PMID: 10.1080/19424396.2007.1222129418240748)
Abdelkarim A (2019) Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Dent J (Basel) 7:89. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030089. (PMID: 10.3390/dj703008931480667)
Garib DG, Calil LR, Leal CR, Janson G (2014) Is there a consensus for CBCT use in Orthodontics? Dent Press J Orthod 19:136–149. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.136-149.sar. (PMID: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.5.136-149.sar)
Isman O, Aktan AM, Ertas ET (2020) Evaluating the effects of orthodontic materials, field of view, and artifact reduction mode on accuracy of CBCT-based caries detection. Clin Oral Investig 24:2487–2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03112-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-019-03112-731811495)
ZHERMACK, Zetaplus (2021) Instruction Manual. In: https://www.zhermack.com/public/uploads/Zetaplus&#95;System&#95;booklet&#95;IFU.pdf.
Martins LAC, Brasil DM, Freitas DQ, Oliveira ML (2023) A novel method of objectively detecting tooth ankylosis using cone-beam computed tomography: a laboratory study. Imaging Sci Dent 53:61. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220186. (PMID: 10.5624/isd.202201863700678610060758)
Roth RH (1987) The straight-wire appliance 17 years later. J Clin Orthod 21:632–642. (PMID: 3482093)
Nascimento EHL, Fontenele RC, de Lopes P A, et al (2021) Development of a model of soft tissue simulation using ballistic gelatin for CBCT acquisitions related to dentomaxillofacial radiology research. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 50. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200191.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J et al (2012) 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001227706903466397)
Bechara B, McMahan C, Geha H, Noujeim M (2012) Evaluation of a cone beam CT artefact reduction algorithm. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 41:422–428. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/43691321. (PMID: 10.1259/dmfr/43691321)
Gurgel JdeA, Kerr S, Powers JM, LeCrone V (2001) Force-deflection properties of superelastic nickel-titanium archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 120:378–382. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.117200. (PMID: 10.1067/mod.2001.117200)
Min C-K, Kim K-A (2021) Reducing metal artifacts between implants in cone-beam CT by adjusting angular position of the subject. Oral Radiol 37:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-020-00458-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s11282-020-00458-732638201)
Wanderley VA, Leite AF, de Faria Vasconcelos K et al (2022) Impact of metal artefacts on subjective perception of image quality of 13 CBCT devices. Clin Oral Investig 26:4457–4466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04409-w. (PMID: 10.1007/s00784-022-04409-w35166942)
Almosa NA, Sibai BS, Rejjal O, Alqahtani N (2019) Enamel demineralization around metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent Volume 11:37–43. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S190893. (PMID: 10.2147/CCIDE.S190893)
Toz Ertop M, Cicek O, Erener H et al (2023) Evaluation of the Demineralization Development around different types of Orthodontic brackets. Materials 16:984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16030984. (PMID: 10.3390/ma16030984367699909917947)
Oliveira ML, Tosoni GM, Lindsey DH et al (2013) Influence of anatomical location on CT numbers in cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115:558–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.01.021. (PMID: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.01.02123522649)
Valizadeh S, Vasegh Z, Rezapanah S et al (2015) Effect of object position in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Field of View for detection of Root fractures in Teeth with Intra-canal posts. Iran J Radiol 12. https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.25272.
Machado AH, Fardim KAC, de Souza CF et al (2018) Effect of anatomical region on the formation of metal artefacts produced by dental implants in cone beam computed tomographic images. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 47:20170281. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170281. (PMID: 10.1259/dmfr.20170281)
معلومات مُعتمدة: 001 Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
فهرسة مساهمة: Keywords: Artefacts; Cone beam computed tomography; Fixed orthodontic appliances; Orthodontics
تواريخ الأحداث: Date Created: 20240726 Date Completed: 20240727 Latest Revision: 20240727
رمز التحديث: 20240729
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05840-x
PMID: 39060664
قاعدة البيانات: MEDLINE
الوصف
تدمد:1436-3771
DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-05840-x